Abstract
Whereas scientists formulate laws and theories to account for observations, inventors create new technology to accomplish practical goals. Scientific discovery and technological innovation are among the most important accomplishments of the creative human mind. The aim of this paper is to compare how scientists produce discoveries with how inventors produce new technology. After briefly reviewing an account of the recent discovery of the bacterial theory of ulcers, we show that a similar account applies to the discovery that dinosaurs became extinct because of an asteroid collision. Both these discoveries involved a combination of serendipity, questioning and search. We then describe how these three processes also contributed to a very important recent technological innovation, the development of the programming language Java. The paper concludes with a more general assessment of the similarities and differences between cognitive processes involved in discovery and invention.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alvarez, W., 1998, T. Rex and the Crater of Doom, Vintage, New York.
Bank, D., 1995, The Java saga, Wired 3(12).
Dasgupta, S., 1996, Technology and Creativity, Oxford University Press, New York.
Gorman, M.E., 1992, Simulating Science, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.
Gosling, J., 1995, Oak intermediate bytecodes, available at http://www.javasoft.com
Gosling, J., n.d., A brief history of the green project, available at http://www.javasoft.com/people/jag/green/iridex.html.
Holyoak, K.J., and Thagard, P., 1995, Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought, MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA.
Israel, P., 1998, Edison: A Life of Invention. Wiley, New York.
Roberts, R.M., 1989, Serendipity: Accidental Discoveries in Science,Wiley, New York.
Shelley, C.P., 1996, Visual abductive reasoning in archaeology, Philosophy of Science 63:278–301.
Thagard, P., 1991, The dinosaur debate: explanatory coherence and the problem of competing hypotheses, in: Philosophy and AI: Essays at the Interface, J. Pollock and R. Cummins, eds., MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA, pp. 279–300.
Thagard, P., 1997, Collaborative knowledge, Noûs 31:242–261.
Thagard, P., 1999, How Scientists Explain Disease, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thagard, P., Croft, D. (1999). Scientific Discovery and Technological Innovation: Ulcers, Dinosaur Extinction, and the Programming Language Java. In: Magnani, L., Nersessian, N.J., Thagard, P. (eds) Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4813-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4813-3_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7181-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4813-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive