Abstract
How do scientists think, reason, and generate new models and theories? Over the past decade, I have been addressing these questions by investigating scientists in their own labs, reasoning about their research “live’ and by conducting experiments on scientific thinking and model building. The labs are molecular biology and immunology laboratories in the U.S., Canada, and Italy. I have found that one place where much reasoning and new discoveries are made is at weekly lab meetings. We have performed extensive cognitive analyses of these meetings and have identified some of the key components of contemporary scientific thinking that are important in generating new models, modifying old models and solving difficult problems. In this paper I will outline four important activities that are important in model building: analogical reasoning, attention to unexpected findings, experimental design, and distributed reasoning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baker, L.M., and Dunbar, K., 1996, Constraints on the experimental design process in real-world science, in: Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, G.W. Cottrell, ed., Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 154–159.
Baker, L.M., and Dunbar, K., 1999, Experiment design heuristics: the use of known controls and baselines, manuscript submitted for publication
Dama, M., and Dunbar, K., 1996, Distributed reasoning. When social and cognitive worlds fuse, in: Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 166–170.
Dama, M., and Dunbar, K., 1999, Distributed reasoning and representational change in real-world science laboratories, manuscript submitted for publication
Dunbar, K., 1999, Beyond the myth of the unexpected: are scientists the victims of chance?, manuscript submitted for publication
Dunbar, K., 1997, How scientists think: online creativity and conceptual change in science, in: Conceptual Structures and Processes: Emergence, Discovery and Change, T.B. Ward, S.M. Smith, and S. Vaid, eds., APA Press, Washington DC.
Dunbar, K., 1995, How scientists really reason: scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories, in: The Nature of Insight, R.J. Sternberg and J. E. Davidson, eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 365–395.
Dunbar, K., 1993, In Vivo cognition: knowledge representation and change in real-world scientific laboratories, paper presented at the “Society for Research in Child Development”, New Orleans, LA, March 26.
Forbus, K., Gentner, D., and Law, K., 1995, MAC/FAC: a model of similarity-based retrieval, Cognitive Science 19:141–205.
Friedland, P.E., and Iwasaki, Y., 1985, The concept and implementation of skeletal plans, Journal of Automated Reasoning 1:161–208.
Galison, P., 1987, How Experiments End, Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL.
Gentner, D., and Jeziorski, M., 1993, The shift from metaphor to analogy in western science, in: Metaphor and Thought, A. Ortony, ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hacking, I., 1983, Representing and Intervening, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Holyoak, K.J., and Thagard, P., 1995, Mental Leaps, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Holyoak, K.J., and Thagard, P., 1997, The analogical mind, American Psychologist 52:35–44.
Klahr, D., and Dunbar, K., 1988, Dual space search during scientific reasoning, Cognitive Science 12:1–48.
Kulkarni, D., and Simon, H.A., 1988, The processes of scientific discovery: the strategy of experimentation, Cognitive Science 12:139–175.
Thagard, P., 1997, Collaborative knowledge, Noûs 31:242–261.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dunbar, K. (1999). How Scientists Build Models In Vivo Science as a Window on the Scientific Mind. In: Magnani, L., Nersessian, N.J., Thagard, P. (eds) Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4813-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4813-3_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7181-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4813-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive