Skip to main content

How Scientists Build Models In Vivo Science as a Window on the Scientific Mind

  • Chapter
Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery

Abstract

How do scientists think, reason, and generate new models and theories? Over the past decade, I have been addressing these questions by investigating scientists in their own labs, reasoning about their research “live’ and by conducting experiments on scientific thinking and model building. The labs are molecular biology and immunology laboratories in the U.S., Canada, and Italy. I have found that one place where much reasoning and new discoveries are made is at weekly lab meetings. We have performed extensive cognitive analyses of these meetings and have identified some of the key components of contemporary scientific thinking that are important in generating new models, modifying old models and solving difficult problems. In this paper I will outline four important activities that are important in model building: analogical reasoning, attention to unexpected findings, experimental design, and distributed reasoning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baker, L.M., and Dunbar, K., 1996, Constraints on the experimental design process in real-world science, in: Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, G.W. Cottrell, ed., Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 154–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, L.M., and Dunbar, K., 1999, Experiment design heuristics: the use of known controls and baselines, manuscript submitted for publication

    Google Scholar 

  • Dama, M., and Dunbar, K., 1996, Distributed reasoning. When social and cognitive worlds fuse, in: Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 166–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dama, M., and Dunbar, K., 1999, Distributed reasoning and representational change in real-world science laboratories, manuscript submitted for publication

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, K., 1999, Beyond the myth of the unexpected: are scientists the victims of chance?, manuscript submitted for publication

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, K., 1997, How scientists think: online creativity and conceptual change in science, in: Conceptual Structures and Processes: Emergence, Discovery and Change, T.B. Ward, S.M. Smith, and S. Vaid, eds., APA Press, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, K., 1995, How scientists really reason: scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories, in: The Nature of Insight, R.J. Sternberg and J. E. Davidson, eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 365–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, K., 1993, In Vivo cognition: knowledge representation and change in real-world scientific laboratories, paper presented at the “Society for Research in Child Development”, New Orleans, LA, March 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbus, K., Gentner, D., and Law, K., 1995, MAC/FAC: a model of similarity-based retrieval, Cognitive Science 19:141–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, P.E., and Iwasaki, Y., 1985, The concept and implementation of skeletal plans, Journal of Automated Reasoning 1:161–208.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Galison, P., 1987, How Experiments End, Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D., and Jeziorski, M., 1993, The shift from metaphor to analogy in western science, in: Metaphor and Thought, A. Ortony, ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I., 1983, Representing and Intervening, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak, K.J., and Thagard, P., 1995, Mental Leaps, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak, K.J., and Thagard, P., 1997, The analogical mind, American Psychologist 52:35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klahr, D., and Dunbar, K., 1988, Dual space search during scientific reasoning, Cognitive Science 12:1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni, D., and Simon, H.A., 1988, The processes of scientific discovery: the strategy of experimentation, Cognitive Science 12:139–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P., 1997, Collaborative knowledge, Noûs 31:242–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dunbar, K. (1999). How Scientists Build Models In Vivo Science as a Window on the Scientific Mind. In: Magnani, L., Nersessian, N.J., Thagard, P. (eds) Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4813-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4813-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7181-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4813-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics