Abstract
The paper accepts Hans Vaihinger’s suggestion that “as if’ conditionals contain a counterfactual element and aims to developing a formal analysis of them by using conditionals expressing a consequential connection between the clauses. The key idea is that ”as if’ counterfactuals are explicit counterfactuals with true consequents, whose rendering is unproblematic at the propositional level. The most interesting problems however arise when the “as if’ concerns not a comparison between facts but a comparison between gradable predicates. The solution proposed here relies on Seuren’s theory of comparison and make an essential use of existential quantification over extents, while existential quantification over predicates allows to render the notion of similarity which appears to be involved in many ordinary uses of “as if”. It is stressed that the proposed analysis gives a solution also to the problem of so-called counter-comparatives, which has been treated by David Lewis in the framework of counterpart theory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams, E., 1993, On the rightness of certain counterfactuals, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 74:1–10.
Anderson, A.R., 1951, A note on subjunctive and counterfactual conditionals, Analysis 12:35–38.
Goodman, N., 1947, The problem of counterfactual conditionals, Journal of Philosophy 44:113–128.
Grund, C., 1982, Metaphors, counterfactuals and music, in: Intensional Logics: Theory and Applications, I. Niiniluoto and E. Saarinen, eds., North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 28–53.
Lewis, D., 1973, Counterfactuals, Blackwell, Oxford.
McCawley, J.D., 1981, Everything that Linguists always Wanted to Know about Logic but were Ashamed to Ask, Blackwell, Oxford.
Pizzi, C., 1981, “Since”, “even if’, ”as if’, in: Italian Studies in the Philosophy of Science, M. Dalla Chiara, ed., Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 73–87.
Pizzi, C., 1990, Stalnaker-Lewis conditionals: three grades of holistic involvement, Logique et Analyse 131/132:311–329.
Pizzi, C., 1991, Decision procedures for logics of consequential implication, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 32:618–636.
Plantinga, A.,1974, The Nature of Necessity, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Ross, J.R., 1968, A proposed rule of tree pruning, in: Modern Studies in English, D.A. Reibel and S.A. Schane, eds., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., pp. 288–299.
Seuren, P., 1973, The comparative, in: Generative Grammar in Europe, F. Kiefer and N. Ruwet, eds, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 528–564.
Shuford, H.R., 1964, The logical connector “as if’, Journal of Philosophy 61:697–698.
Tormey, A.,1983, Metaphors and counterfactuals, in: Essays on Aesthetics: Perspectives on the Work of Monroe C. Beardsley, J. Fisher, ed., Temple University Press, Philadelphia, pp. 528–564.
Vaihinger, H., 1911, Die Philosophie des “Als Ob”, Reuther und Reichard, Berlin (translated by R. Ogden, Paul Trench and Trubner, London, 1924).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pizzi, C. (1999). Fictionalism and the Logic of “As If” Conditionals. In: Magnani, L., Nersessian, N.J., Thagard, P. (eds) Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4813-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4813-3_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7181-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4813-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive