Skip to main content

Apoptosis by Anthracyclines at Therapeutic Concentrations in MDR1+ Human Leukemic Cells

  • Chapter
Book cover Drug Resistance in Leukemia and Lymphoma III

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 457))

Abstract

Induction of apoptosis by daunorubicin (DNR) and idarubicin (IDA) was evaluated cytofluorometrically in CEM and CEM-MDR1+ leukemic cells exposed to drug concentrations similar to peak plasma levels obtainable in vivo (DNR 200–400 ng/ml, IDA 50–100 ng/ml, 30′ incubation), and differentiating apoptosis from necrosis (FITC-annexin V+/propidium iodide- and + cells, respectively). Firstly, to set experimental conditions, apoptosis was evaluated in CEM cells at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours from end of drug incubation, the maximal increase being noted at 24–48 hours. Net apoptosis rates were determined after subtraction of the spontaneous activity observed in untreated cells. The apoptotic effect from varying drug type and concentration was compared at 24 hours in CEM-MDR1+ cells, with and without co-incubation with MDR1 functional downregulator cyclosporin A (CSA) used at therapeutic concentration (1500 ng/ml). The results indicated that, at drug concentrations likely to be approached in vivo as a short-lasting peak level (IDA 100–200 ng/ml) with increased-dose IDA (>12–15 mg/m2), pro-apoptotic effects by IDA+CSA in CEM-MDR1+ cells were significantly greater than by DNR+CSA, and corresponded to the levels observed with IDA 50 ng/ml without CSA in control CEM cells. This in vitro study demonstrates that it is possible to determine in the same sample cell fluorescence related to anthracyclines, apoptotic cells (FITC-annexin V positive), and necrotic cells (propidium iodide positive), and confirms that cytofluorimetric evaluation of apoptosis can reliably predict the effects of anthracycines in function of drug type, concentration and, in MDR1+ cells, concurrent MDR1 inhibition. Extension of this assay to the clinical ground may be warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hannun YA. Apoptosis and the dilemma of cancer chemotherapy. Blood 89:1845–1853, 1997.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Speth PAJ, Minderman H, Haanen C: Idarubicin v daunorubicin: preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetic studies. Semin Oncol 16:2–9, 1989 (suppl 2).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ames MA, Spreafico F: Selected pharmacologic characteristics of idarubicin and idarubicinol. Leukemia 6:70–75, 1992 (suppl 1).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wheatley K: Meta-analysis of randomized trials of idarubicin (IDAR) or mitozantrone (MITO) versus daunorubicin (DNR) as induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Blood 86: 434a, 1995 (suppl 1, abstr).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bassan R, Barbui T: Remission induction therapy for adults with acute myelogenous leukemia: towards the ICE age?. Haematologica 80:82–90, 1995.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ross D, Tong Y, Cornblatt B: Idarubicin (IDA) is less vulnerable to transport-mediated multidrug resistance (MDR) than its metabolite idarubicinol (IDAol) or daunorubicin (DNR). Blood 82: 257a, 1993 (suppl 1, abstr 1015).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berman E, McBride M: Comparative cellular pharmacology of daunorubicin and idarubicin in human multidrug-resistant leukemia cells. Blood 79:3267–3273, 1992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chiodini B, Bassan R, Borleri G, Lerede T, Barbui T. Idarubicin activity against multidrug resistant (mdr-1+) cells is increased by cyclosporin A. In: Hiddemann W et al (eds.) Acute Leukemias VII. Springer, Berlin 1998, pp. 475–482.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Leith CP, Chen I-M, Kopecky KJ, et al: Correlation of multidrug resistance (MDR1) protein expression with functional dye/drug efflux in acute myeloid leukemia by multiparameter flow cytometry: identification of discordant MDR-/efflux+ and MDR+/efflux- cases. Blood 86:2329–2342, 1995.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Reid JM, Pendergrass TW, Krailo MD, Hammond GD, Ames MM: Plasma pharmacokinetics and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of idarubicin and idarubicinol in pediatric leukemia patients. A Childrens Cancer Study Group report. Cancer Res 50:6525–6528, 1990.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. List AF, Speier C, Greer J, et al: Phase I/II trial of cyclosporine as a chemotherapy-resistance modifier in acute leukemia. J Clin Oncol 11:1652–1660, 1993.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Koopman G, Reutelingsperger CPM, Kuijten GAM, et al: Annexin V for flow cytometric detection of phosphatidylserine expression on B cells undergoing apoptosis. Blood 84:1415–1420, 1994.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kokenberg E, Sonneveld P, Delwel R, et al: In vivo uptake of daunorubicin by acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells measured by flow cytometry. Leukemia 2:511–517, 1988.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. List AF: The role of multidrug resistance and its pharmacological modulation in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 10: S46–S51, 1996 (suppl 2).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Solary E, Caillot D, Chauffert B, et al: Feasibility of using quinine, a potential multidrug resistance-reversing agent, in combination with mitoxantrone and cytarabine for the treatment of acute leukemia. J Clin Oncol 10:1730–1736, 1992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kornblau SM, Estey E, Madden T, et al: Phase I study of mitoxantrone plus etoposide with multidrug blockade by SDZ PSC-833 in relapsed or refractory acute myelogenous leukemia. J Clin Oncol 15:1796–1802, 1997.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ito C, Ribeiro RC, Behm FG, Raimondi SC, Pui C-H, Campana C. Cyclosporin A induces apoptosis in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Blood 91:1001–1007, 1998.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ross DD, Wooten PJ, Tong Y, et al: Synergistic reversal of multidrug-resistance phenotype in acute myeloid leukemia by cyclosporin A and cremophor EL. Blood 83:1337–1347, 1994.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Weiss M, Maslak P, Megherian L, Scheinberg D. A phase I trial of a single high dose of idarubicin combined with high dose cytarabine (ARA-C) as induction therapy in relapsed and refractory adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Blood 86: 786a, 1995 (suppl 1, abstr 3131).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chiodini, B., Bassan, R., Barbui, T. (1999). Apoptosis by Anthracyclines at Therapeutic Concentrations in MDR1+ Human Leukemic Cells. In: Kaspers, G.J.L., Pieters, R., Veerman, A.J.P. (eds) Drug Resistance in Leukemia and Lymphoma III. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 457. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4811-9_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4811-9_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7180-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4811-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics