Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to report the panel discussion on symbolism and connectionism paradigms. In particular, the following hot point are analysed:
-
what cognitive phenomena are most difficult for connectionists to explain?
-
what cognitive phenomena are most naturally explained in connectionist terms?
-
is symbolic deduction a central kind of human thinking? How do people make deductions?
-
is nondeductive reasoning done in accord with the laws of probability?
-
what areas of knowledge do you have that are easily described in terms of symbolic rules?
-
concepts reduced to rules, concepts reduced to networks;
-
symbolic and connectionist mechanisms of analogy;
-
planning, decision, explanation, learning, language, in front of the symbolic/connectionist dichotomy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
P. Thagard, Mind. Introduction to Cognitive Science, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1996).
M. Genesereth and N. Nilsson, Logical Foundations of Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA (1987).
J. Pearl, Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA (1988).
M. Minsky, A framework for representing knowledge, in: The Psychology of Computer Vision, P. Winston ed., McGraw-Hill, New York (1975).
R.C. Schank and R.P. Abelson, Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding, An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1977).
A. Newell, C. Shaw, and H. Simon, Elements of a theory of human problem solving, Psychological Review 65, 151–166 (1958).
A. Newell and H. Simon, Human Problem Solving, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1972).
A. Newell, Unified Theories of Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1990).
J.R. Anderson, Cognitive Science and its Implications, Freeman, New York (1980).
J.R. Anderson, Rules of the Mind, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1993).
K. Holyoak and P. Thagard, Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1995).
S.M. Kosslyn, Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1994).
S.M. Kosslyn and O. Koenig, Wet Mind The New Cognitive Neuroscience, Free Press, New York (1992).
J.I. Glasgow and D. Papadias, Computational imagery, Cognitive Science 16, 355–394 (1992).
D. Mari and T. Poggio, Cooperative computation of stereo disparity, Science 194, 283–287 (1976).
J. Feldman, A connectionist model of visual memory, in: Parallel Models of Associative Memory, G. E. Hinton and J. A. Anderson eds., Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1981).
J.L. McClelland and D.E. Rumelhart, An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. Part I, An account of basic findings, Psychological Review 88, 375–407 (1981).
P.M. Churchland, The Engine of Reason, the Seat of the Soul, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1995).
P. Thagard and E. Millgram, Inference to the best plan: a coherence theory of decision, in: Goal-Driven Learning, A. Ram and D. B. Leake eds., The MIT Press, Camdridge, MA (1995).
S.M. Mannes and W. Kintsch, Routine computing tasks: planning as understanding, Cognitive Science 15, 305–342 (1991).
D. Touretzky and G. Hinton, A distributed production system, Cognitive Science 12, 423–466 (1988).
G. Nelson, P. Thagard, and S. Hardy, Integrating analogies with rules and explanations, in: Advances in Connectionism vol. II, K. Holyoak and J. Barnden eds., Ablex, Norwood, NJ (1994).
P.M. Churchland, A Neurocomputational Perspective, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1989).
P. Thagard, Explanatory coherence, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, 435–467 (1989).
P. Thagard, Conceptual Revolutions, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1992).
D.E. Rumelhart, J.L. McClelland, and PDP Research Group, Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1986).
D.E. Rumelhart and J.L. McClelland., An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. Part 2, The contextual enhancement effect and some tests extensions of the model, Psychological Review 89, 60–94 (1982).
W. Kintsch, The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model, Psychological Review 95, 163–182 (1988).
M.S. Seidenberg and J.L. McClelland, A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming, Psychological Review 96, 523–568 (1989).
A. Prince and P. Smolenski, Optimality: from neural networks to universal grammar, Science, 275 1604–1610 (1997).
M.G. Dyer, Symbolic neuroengineering for natural language processing: a multilev approach, in: Advances in Connectionist and Neural Computation Theory vol I, J.A. Barnden and J.B. Pollack eds., Ablex, Norwood, NJ (1991).
L.R. Medsker, Hybrid Neural Networks and Expert Systems, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1994).
E. Burattini, M. De Gregorio, and G. Tamburrini, Hybrid expert systems. An approach combinig neural computation and rule-based reasoning, in: Expert Systems Techniques and Applications, C. D. Leontes ed., Gordon and Breach, London (1998).
A. Chella, M. Frixione, and S. Gaglio, A cognitive architecture for artificial vision, Artificial Intelligence 89, 73–111 (1997).
A. Chella, M. Frixione, and S. Gaglio, An architecture for autonomous agents exploiting conceptual representations, Robotics and Autonomous Systems 25(3–4), 231–240 (1998).
M. Brady and H. Hu, The mind of a robot, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 349:15–28 (1994).
P. Gärdenfors, Conceptual Space, Lund University Cognitive Science (1998).
D. Marr and L. Vaina, Representation and recognition of the movements of shapes, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 214, 501–524 (1982).
C.R. Gallistel, The Organization of Action: A New Syntesis, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ (1980).
J.F. Allen, Towards a general theory of action and time, Artificial Intelligence 23(2), 123–154 (1984).
R.J. Brachman and J.C. Schmoltze, An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system, Cognitive Science, 9(2), 171–216 (1985).
D.H. Ballard, Cortical connections and parallel processing: structure and function, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, 67–120 (1986).
J.J. Hopfield, Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 79, 2554–2558 (1982).
D. Kleinfeld, Sequential state generation by model neural networks, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 9469–9473 (1986).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Magnani, L., Chella, A., da Fontoura Costa, L. (1999). Panel Summary: Symbolism and Connectionism Paradigms. In: Cantoni, V., Di Gesù, V., Setti, A., Tegolo, D. (eds) Human and Machine Perception 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4809-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4809-6_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7179-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4809-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive