Abstract
About half the time the American Psychological Association submits an amicus brief to the Supreme Court, the Court’s eventual decision is consistent—or at least partly consistent—with the APA’s position. This chapter examines in detail some cases that reflect, for want of a better term, “success” on the APA’s part. That is not to say that in all of these cases the APA’s position was directly reflected in the wording of the decision; the brief may have achieved some success by causing the Court to think about new issues, even if the process is not clearly discernible in the eventual published opinion. The examples that follow reflect such qualifications.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wrightsman, L.S. (1999). The APA’s Amicus Attempts to Influence the Supreme Court. In: Judicial Decision Making. Perspectives in Law & Psychology, vol 11. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4807-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4807-2_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7178-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4807-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive