Abstract
Genetic testing for cancer susceptibility is new and therefore deserves the careful attention of physicians in order to assure that the tests are performed and interpreted in an appropriate fashion. On occasion, genetic testing for cancer susceptibility will present ethical dilemmas with which many clinicians will not be familiar. A brief case presentation will frame these issues for subsequent discussion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Geller G, Botkin J, Green M, Press N, Biesecker B, et al: Genetic testing for susceptibility to adult-onset cancer: the process and content of informed consent. JAMA 277:1467–1474, 1997
MacMahon S, Peto R, Cutler J, et al: Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease: Part 1, prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias. Lancet 335:765–774, 1990
Anon: Classification, Prevalence, Detection, and Evaluation. Circulation 89:1344–1356, 1994
Lerman C, Narod S, Schulman K, Hughs C, et al: BRCA1 testing in families with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. JAMA 275:1885–1892, 1996
Burke W, Daly M, Garber J, Botkin J, et al: Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with inherited predisposition to cancer: BRCA1 and BRCA2. JAMA 277:997–1003, 1997
Burke W, Petersen G, Lynch P, Botkin J, Daly M, et al: Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with inherited predisposition to cancer: hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. JAMA 277:915–919, 1997
Murray T: Genetic exceptionalism, and “future diaries”: Is genetic information different from other medical information? in Rothstein M (Ed) Genetic Secrets: Protecting Privacy and Confidentiality in the Genetic Era. Yale University Press, New Haven, 60–73, 1997
Strohman RC: The coming Kuhnian revolution in biology. Nature Biotechnology 15:194–200, 1997
National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research. Statement on use of DNA testing for presymptomatic identification of cancer risk. JAMA 271:785, 1994
Collins FS: BRCA1—Lots of mutations, lots of dilemmas. N Engl J Med 334:186–188, 1996
American Society of Human Genetics. Statement of the American Society of Human Genetics on Genetic Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Predisposition. Am J Hum Genet 55:i–iv, 1994
Visco F: Commentary on the ASCO statement on genetic testing for cancer susceptibility [press release] Washington, DC, National Breast Cancer Coalition
Statement of the American Society of Clinical Oncology: Genetic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility. J Clin Oncology 14:1730–1736, 1996
Mark Skolnick, Ph.D., Myriad Genetics, 1996
Task Force on Genetic Testing. Promoting Safe and Effective Genetic Testing in the United States:Final Report of the Task Force on Genetic Testing. Holtzman NA, Watson MS (Eds) available at http://www.nhgri.nih.gov/ELSI/TFGT_final/
Croyle R, Smith K, Botkin J, Baty B, Nash J: Psychological responses to BRCA1 mutation testing:preliminary findings. Health Psychology 16:63–72, 1997
Giardiello FM, Brensinger JD, Petersen GM, et al: The use and interpretation of commercial APC gene testing for familial adenomatous polyposis. New Engl J Med 336:823–827, 1997
Allen A: Genetic privacy: emerging concepts and values. In Rothstein M (Ed) Genetic Secrets: Protecting Privacy and Confidentiality in the Genetic Era. Yale University Press, New Haven, 31–59, 1997
Annas GJ, Glantz L, Roche PA: The Genetic Privacy Act. 1995, Boston: Boston University School of Public Health
The American Society of Human Genetics Social Issues Subcommittee on Familial Disclosure. Professional Disclosure of Familial Genetic Information. Am J Hum Genet 62:474–483, 1998
Tarasoff V: Regents of University of California 551 P.2d 334
Pate V: Threkel, 661 So. 2d 278 (1995)
Safer V: Estate of Pack 677 A. 2d 1188
Wertz D, Fletcher J. An international survey of attitudes of medical geneticists toward mass screening and access to results. 1989 Publ Health Reports 104:35–44
Fost N: Genetic diagnosis and treatment: Ethical considerations. AJDC 147:1190–1195, 1993
Botkin J, Croyle RT, Smith KR, Baty B, Lerman C, Goldgar D, Ward J, Flick B, Nash J: A model protocol for evaluating the behavioral and psychosocial effects of BRCA1 testing. JNCI 88:872–882, 1996
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Botkin, J.R. (1999). Ethical and Legal Issues in Genetic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility. In: Shaw, G.L. (eds) Cancer Genetics for the Clinician. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4699-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4699-3_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7128-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4699-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive