Skip to main content

Statistical Interpretation

  • Chapter
  • 265 Accesses

Abstract

Here we discuss some aspects of the so called statistical interpretation of quantum theory (SIQT), which rejects the idea that the wave function describes one individual quantum system. The main claim of the SIQT, which originated from some of Einstein’s ideas1, is that a quantum state, which may be pure and then described by a state vectorΨ) or mixed and in this case described by a density matrix p, represents an ensemble of identically prepared systems. We shall denote the ensemble by ε) or ε| p depending on the case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Jammer, The Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Theory (J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. E. Ballentine, The statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 42(4), 358–381 (1970).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. A. D. Alexandrov, On the meaning of the wave function (in Russian), Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 85, 292–294 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. J. Mjakishev, What is the cause of the statistical character of quantum mechanics (in Russian), Voprossy Filosofii 6, 146–159 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Monroe et al, A “Schrödinger cat” superposition state of an atom, Science 272, 1131–1136 (1996).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Brune, E. Hagley, J. Dreyer, X. Maître, A. Maali, C. Wunderlich, S. Haroche and J. P. Raymond, Observing the progressive decoherence of the “meter” in a quantum measurement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77(24), 4887–4890 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. D. T. Gillespie, Untenability of simple ensemble interpretations of quantum measurements probabilities, Am. J. Phys. 54(10), 889–894 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Bitbol, An analysis of the Einstein-Podolski-Rosen correlations in terms of events, Phys. Lett. A 96(2), 66–70 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grib, A.A., Rodrigues, W.A. (1999). Statistical Interpretation. In: Nonlocality in Quantum Physics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4687-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4687-0_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7122-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4687-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics