Abstract
While psychologists have known for some time that people use categories with blurred edges and gradations of membership, the field has been slow to take up ideas from fuzzy set theory and fuzzy logic. Despite critiques and controversies, by the late 80’s fuzzy sets achieved a degree of legitimacy in psychology. This chapter reviews recent developments and the current state of fuzzy set theory and applications in psychology. Beginning with the gradient thesis, it surveys the uses of fuzzy sets in the operationalization and measurement of psychological concepts. The focus then shifts to modeling and data analytic techniques, and ends with a review of psychological theories and frameworks that use fuzzy sets. Because of space limitations, many topics and important works have had to be treated with more brevity than we would have wished, but we have striven for a balanced account of this diverse and still rapidly growing literature.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alliger, G.M., Feinzig, S.L., & Janak, E.A. (1993). Fuzzy sets and personnel selection: Discussion and an application. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 163–169.
Anderson, N.H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.
Anderson, N.H. (1982). Methods of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.
Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika 43, 561–573.
Bar-Hillel, M. (1973). On the subjective probability of compound events. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9, 396–406.
Bass, B.M., Cascio, W.F., and O’Connor, E.J. (1974). Magnitude estimation of expression of frequency and amount. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 313–320.
Beach, C. M. (1991). The interpretation of prosodic patterns at points of syntactic structure ambiguity: Evidence for cue trading relations. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 644–663.
Beyth-Marom, R. (1981). The subjective probability of conjunctions (rep. no. 81–12). Eugene, OR: Decision Research.
Broughton, R. (1990). The prototype concept in personality assessment. Canadian-Psychology, 31, 26–37.
Budescu, D.V. & Wallsten, T.S. (1985). Consistency in interpretation of probabilistic phrases. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 391–405.
Budescu, D.V., Zwick, R., Wallsten, T. S., & Erev, I. (1990). Integration of linguistic probabilities. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 33, 657–676.
Burisch, M. (1993). In search of theory: Some ruminations on the nature and etiology of burnout. In Wilmar B. Schaufeli, Christina Maslach, & Tadeusz Marek (Eds.), Professional burnout: recent developments in theory and research. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis, 75–93.
Capozza, D. & Nanni, R. (1986). Differentiation processes for social stimuli with different degrees of category representativeness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 399–412.
Cohen, B. & Murphy, G. L. (1984). Models of concepts. Cognitive Science, 8, 27–58.
Cohen, J. and Hansel, C.E.M. (1959). Preferences for different combinations of chance and skill in gambling. Nature (London), 183, 841–842.
Collins, A. M. & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240–247.
Dubois, D. & Prade, H. (1980). Fuzzy sets and systems: theory and applications. New York: Academic Press.
Dubois, D. & Prade, H. (1985). A review of fuzzy set aggregation connectives. Information Sciences, 36, 85–121.
Fehr, B. & Russell, J.A. (1991). The concept of love viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Personality and Social-Psychology, 60, 425–438.
Fisher, P. F. & Orf, T. M. (1991). An investigation of the meaning of near and close on a university campus. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 15, 23–35.
Foddy, M. & Smithson, M. (1989). Fuzzy sets and double standards: Modeling the process of ability inference. In: J. Berger, M. Zelditch, & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress: New formulations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Foddy, M. & Smithson, M. (1996). “Relative ability, paths of relevance, and influence in task-oriented groups.” Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 140–153.
French, S. (1987). Fuzzy sets: the unanswered questions. Report of the Statistical Laboratory, Department of Mathematics, University of Manchester.
Goldsmith, R.W. (1978). Assessing probabilities of compound events in a judicial context. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 19, 103–110.
Hampton, J. A. (1988a). Disjunction of natural concepts. Memory & Cognition, 16, 579–591.
Hampton, J. A. (1988b). Overextension of conjunctive concepts: Evidence for a unitary model of concept typicality and class inclusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 12–32.
Hersh, H. M. & Caramazza, A. (1976). A fuzzy set approach to modifiers and vagueness in natural language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 105, 254–276.
Hesketh, B., Elmslie, S., & Kaldor, W. (1990). Career compromise: An alternative account to Gottfredson’s theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 49–56.
Hesketh, B. & Gardner, D. (1993). Person-environment fit models: A reconceptualization and empirical test. Journal-of-Vocational-Behavior; 42, 315–332.
Hesketh, B., McLachlan, K. & Gardner, D. (1992). Work adjustment theory: An empirical test using a fuzzy rating scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 318–337.
Hesketh, B., Pryor, R.G., Gleitzman, M., & Hesketh, T. (1988). Practical applications and psychometric evaluation of a computerised fuzzy graphic rating scale. In T. Zetenyi (Ed.) Fuzzy sets in psychology. Advances in psychology, 56. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 425–454.
Holyoak, K.J. & Glass, A.L. (1978) Recognition confusions among quantifiers. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 17, 249–264.
Horowitz, L.M., & Malle, B.F. (1993). Fuzzy concepts in psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy Research, 3, 131–148.
Huttenlocher, J. & Hedges, L.V. (1994). Combining graded categories: Membership and typicality. Psychological Review, 101, 157–165.
Kay, P. & McDaniel, C. (1975). Color categories as fuzzy sets (Working Paper No. 44). Berkeley: University of California, Language Behavior Research Laboratory.
Kempton, W. (1978). Category grading and taxonomic relations: A mug is a sort of a cup. American Ethnologist, 5, 44–65.
Kochen, M. (1975). Applications of fuzzy sets in psychology. In L. A. Zadeh, K. S. Fu, K. Tanaka, & M. Shimura (Eds.), Fuzzy sets and their applications to cognitive and decision processes. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Labov, W. (1973). The boundaries of words and their meanings. In C.-J. N. Bailey & R. W. Shuy (Eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in English. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1973). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2, 458–508.
Lichtenstein, S. & Newman, J.R. (1967). Empirical scaling of common verbal phrases associated with numerical probabilities. Psychonomic Sciences, 9, 563–564.
Lopes, L. L. (1987). Between hope and fear: The psychology of risk. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 255–295.
Lopes, L. L. (1990). Re-modeling risk aversion. In G. M. von Furstenberg (Ed.), Acting Under Uncertainty: Multidisciplinary Conceptions (pp. 267–299). Boston: Kluwer.
Macvicar-Whelen, P. J. (1978). Fuzzy sets, the concept of height, and the hedge “very”. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-8, 507–511.
Massaro, D. W. (1987). Speech perception by eye and by ear: a paradigm for psychological inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Massaro, D. W. (1989). Testing between the TRACE model and the fuzzy logical model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 398–421.
Massaro, D. W. & Hary (1986). Addressing issues in letter recognition. Psychological Research, 48, 123–132.
Massaro, D. W. & Sanocki, T. (1993). Visual information processing in reading. In D. M. Willows, R. S. Kruk, & E. Corcos (Eds.) Visual processes in reading and reading disabilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Massaro, D.W., Weldon, M.S., & Kitzis, S.N. (1991). Integration of orthographic and semantic information in memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 277–287.
Manton, K.G., Woodbury, M.A., & Tolley, D.H. (1994). Statistical applications using fuzzy sets. New York, N.Y.: John Wiley & Sons.
McClelland, J. L. (1991). Stochastic interactive processes and the effect of context on perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 1–44.
McClelland, J. L. & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1–86.
McCloskey, M. E. & Glucksberg, S. (1978). Natural categories: well defined or fuzzy sets? Memory & Cognition, 6, 462–472.
McDowell, B. D. & Oden, G. C. (1995). Categorical decisions, rating judgments, and information preservation. Unpublished manuscript.
Moore, C. F., Dixon, J.A.., & Haines, B.A. (1991). Components of understanding in proportional reasoning: A fuzzy set representation of developmental progressions. Child-Development, 62, 441–459.
Moyer, R. S. (1973). Comparing objects in memory: evidence suggesting an internal psychophysics. Perception & Psychophysics, 13, 180–184.
Newstead, S.E. (1988) Quantifiers as fuzzy concepts. In T. Zetenyi (Ed.) Fuzzy sets in psychology. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 51–72.
Newstead, S.E. & Collins, J. (1987). Context and the interpretation of quantifiers of frequency. Ergonomics, 24, 35–49.
Oden, G. C. (1977a). Fuzziness in semantic memory: Choosing exemplars of subjective categories. Memory & Cognition, 5, 198–204.
Oden, G. C. (1977b). Integration of fuzzy logical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 565–575.
Oden, G. C. (1978). Semantic constraints and judged preference for interpretations of ambiguous sentences. Memory & Cognition, 6, 26–37.
Oden, G. C. (1979). A fuzzy logical model of letter identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 336–352.
Oden, G. C. (1981). A fuzzy propositional model of concept structure and use: A case study in object identification. In G. E. Lasker (Ed.) Applied systems research and cybernetics. Vol VI. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
Oden, G. C. (1983). On the use of semantic constraints in guiding syntactic analysis. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 19, 335–357.
Oden, G. C. (1984a). Everything is a good example of something, and other endorsements of the adequacy of a fuzzy theory of concepts. WHIPP 21, Wisconsin Human Information Processing Program Technical Report.
Oden, G. C. (1984b). Dependence, independence, and emergence of word features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 394–405.
Oden, G. C. (1988). FuzzyProp: A symbolic superstrate for connectionist models. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Vol. I, 293–300.
Oden, G. C, & Ekberg, K. (1981). Influence of continuous semantic constraints on the resolution of ambiguous sentences. American Journal of Psychology, 94, 431–442.
Oden, G. C., & Lopes, L. L. (1982). On the internal structure of fuzzy subjective categories. In R. R. Yager (Ed.) Recent developments in fuzzy set and possibility theory. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
Oden, G. C. & Lopes, L. L. (1994). Risky choice with fuzzy criteria. Paper presented at the Symposium on Qualitative Aspects of Decision Making, Universitat Regensburg.
Oden, G. C., & Massaro, D. W. (1978). Integration of featural information in speech perception. Psychological Review, 85, 172–191.
Oden, G. C. & Rueckl, J. G. (1986). Taking language by the hand: Reading handwritten words. Paper presented at the Twenty-seventh Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans, LA.
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Osherson, D. W. & Smith, E. E. (1981). On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts. Cognition, 9, 35–58.
Pepper, S. (1981). Problems in the quantification of frequency expressions. In D. Fiske (ed.) New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Sciences: Problems with Language Imprecision. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Pepper, S. & Prytulak, L.S. (1974). Sometimes frequently means seldom: Context effects in the interpretations of quantitative expressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 95–101.
Pipino, L.L., van Gigch, J.P., & Tom, G. (1981). Experiments in the representation and manipulation of labels of fuzzy sets. Behavioral Science, 26, 216–228.
Pisoni, D. B. & Lazarus, J. H. (1974). Categorical and noncategorical modes of speech perception along the voicing continuum. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55, 328–333.
Pryor, R.G., Hesketh, B., & Gleitzman, M. (1989). Making things clearer by making them fuzzy: Counseling illustrations of a fuzzy graphic rating scale. Career Development Quarterly, 38, 136–147.
Rapoport, A. Wallsten, T.S., & Cox, J.A. (1987). Direct and indirect scaling of membership functions of probability phrases. Mathematical Modeling, 9, 397–411.
Reagan, R.T., Mosteller, F., Youtz, C. (1989). Quantitative meanings of verbal probability expressions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 433–442.
Rosch, E. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192–233.
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rubin, D. C. (1979). On measuring fuzziness: A comment on ‘A fuzzy set approach to modifiers and vagueness in natural languages.’ Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 486–489.
Rueckl, J. G., & Oden, G. C. (1986). The integration of contextual and featural information during word identification. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 445–460.
Rumelhart, D. E., Lindsay, P. H., & Norman, D. A. (1972). A process model for long-term memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization and memory. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Russell, J. A. & Bullock, M. (1986). Fuzzy concepts and the perception of emotion in facial expressions. Social-Cognition, 4, 309–341.
Scherl, L. & Smithson, M. (1987). A new dimension to content analysis: Exploring relationships among thematic categories. Quality and Quantity, 21, 199–208.
Serban, G., Conte, H.R., & Plutchik, R. (1987). Borderline and schizotypal personality disorders: Mutually exclusive or overlapping? Journal of Personality Assessment, 51, 15–22.
Shiina, K. (1988). A fiizzy-set-theoretic feature model and its application to asymmetric similarity data analysis. Japanese Psychological Research, 30, 95–104.
Simpson, R.H. (1944). The specific meanings of certain tenus indicating differing degrees of frequency. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 30, 328–330.
Smithson, M. (1984). Multivariate analysis using ‘and’ and ‘or’. Mathematical Social Sciences, 7, 231–251.
Smithson, M. (1987). Fuzzy Set Analysis for Behavioral and Social Sciences. New York, N.Y.: Springer-Verlag.
Smithson, M. (1988). Possibility theory, fuzzy logic, and psychological explanation. In T. Zetenyi (ed.) Fuzzy Sets in Psychology. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Smithson, M. (1989). Measures of freedom based on possibility. Journal of Mathematical Social Sciences, 18, 81–98.
Smithson, M. (1993). A class of fuzzy featural models of similarity judgments. In R. Lowen & M. Roubens (Eds.) Fuzzy logic: state of the art. Amsterdam: Kluwer, 377–384.
Smithson, M. (1995). A new approach to analysing ordinal data. Australian Journal of Social Research, 1,119–131.
Smithson, M., Amato, P.R., & Pearce, P.L. (1983). Dimensions of helping behaviour. International Series in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 6), (Ed.) Michael Argyle, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Smithson, M.J. and Hesketh, B. (1998). “Using fuzzy sets to extend Holland’s theory of occupational interests.” in L.Reznik, V.Dimitrov and J.Kacprzyk (Eds.) Fuzzy System Design: Social and Engineering Applications. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Vol.17, Berlin: Physica-Verlag: pp. 132–152.
Smithson, M. & Knibb, K. (1986). New measures of association for numerical variables. Journal of Mathematical Social Sciences, 11, 161–182.
Spies, M. (1989). Syllogistic inference under uncertainty. Munich: Psychologie Verlags Union.
Steenkamp, J.B.E., & Wedel, M. (1991). A clusterwise regression method for simultaneous fuzzy market structuring and benefit segmentation. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 385–396.
Steenkamp, J.B.E., & Wedel, M. (1993). Fuzzy clusterwise regression in benefit segmentation: Application and investigation into its validity. Journal of Business Research, 26, 237–249.
Thole, U., Zimmermann, H.-J., & Zysno, P. (1979). On the suitability of minimum and product operators for the intersection of fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2, 167–180.
Thompson & Massaro (1994). Children’s integration of speech and pointing gestures in comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 327–354.
Turksen, I.B. (1991). Measurement of membership functions and their acquisition. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 40, 5–38.
Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327–352.
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1982). Judgments of and by representativeness. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky (eds.) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90, 293–315.
Wallsten, T.S., Budescu, D., Rappoport, A., Zwick, R., and Forsyth, B. (1986). Measuring the vague meanings of probability terms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 348–365.
Wallsten, T.S., Fillenbaum, S. and Cox, J.A. (1986). Base-rate effects on the interpretation of probability and frequency expressions. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 571–581.
Waterhouse,L., Wing, L, & Fein, D. (1989). Re-evaluating the syndrome of autism in the light of empirical research. In Géraldine Dawson (Ed.) Autism: Nature, Diagnosis, and Treatment. New York: Guilford Press, 263–281.
Wyer, R.S., Jr. 1970 “Quantitative prediction of belief and opinion change: A further test of a subjective probability model.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16: 559–570.
Yamashita, T. & Yamashita, K. (1988). Fuzzy theory approach to concepts and logical judgment. Japanese Psychological Review, 31, 208–228.
Yamashita, T. & Yamashita, K. (1992). Exemplifying and comparing fuzzy ratings and magnitude estimations. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 35, 240–248.
Zadeh, L. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.
Zadeh, L. A. (1972). A fuzzy-set-theoretic interpretation of linguistic hedges. Journal of Cybernetics, 2, 4–34.
Zetenyi, T. (Ed.) (1988). Fuzzy sets in psychology. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Zimmermann, H.-J. & Zysno, P. (1980). Latent connectives in human decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 4: 37–51.
Zwick, R. (1987). A note on random sets and the Thurstonian scaling methods. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 21, 351–356.
Zwick, R., Budescus, D.V., & Wallsten, T.S. (1988). An empirical study of the integration of linguistic probabilities. In T. Zetenyi (Ed.) Fuzzy sets in psychology. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 91–126.
Zwick, R. & Wallsten, T.S. (1989). Combining stochastic uncertainty and linguistic inexactness: Theory and experimental evaluation of four fuzzy probability models. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 30, 69–111.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smithson, M., Oden, G.C. (1999). Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications in Psychology. In: Zimmermann, HJ. (eds) Practical Applications of Fuzzy Technologies. The Handbooks of Fuzzy Sets Series, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4601-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4601-6_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7079-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4601-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive