Skip to main content

The Pitfalls in Fitting Garch(1,1) Processes

  • Chapter
Advances in Quantitative Asset Management

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Finance ((SICF,volume 1))

Abstract

Optimization of GARCH(1,1) processes by maximum likelihood has been documented to be numerically difficult and prone to error. In this paper, we show that this difficulty is related to a one dimensional manifold in the parameter space where the likelihood function is large and almost constant. This manifold is revealed by introducing other natural parameterizations for the process, namely other coordinates in the parameter space. In order to avoid spurious fits, we suggest to fix the volatility of the process by a moment estimate and to estimate the remaining parameters with a maximum likelihood procedure. Moreover, the convergence properties of the maximization algorithm are vastly improved by working with one of the new coordinates system. We also investigate the finite sample distribution of the estimated parameters computed with a maximum likelihood. The results indicate that the intercept parameter α0 is strongly biased, whereas the volatility and several of the new coordinates have small bias. The aggregation properties of GARCH(1,1), from 10 minutes to 3.5 days are investigated. The results indicate that the theoretical aggregation relations for this process are not consistent with the FX data. Finally, the process is optimized to deliver the best volatility forecast for the next month.

*

The author would like to thank Tim Bollerslev and Ramazan Gencay for their many suggestions, the members of the research group at Olsen & Associates for their comments, and Ralph Baenziger for the implementation of the optimization programs

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bera, A. K. and M. L. Higgins (1993), ‘ARCH Models: Properties, Estimation and Testing’, Journal of Economic Surveys, 7(4), 305–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, T. (1986), ‘Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity’, Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, T., R. Y. Chou and K. F. Kroner (1992), ‘ARCH Modeling in Finance’, Journal of Econometrics, 52, 5–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dacorogna, M. M., C. L. Gauvreau, U. A. Müller, R. B. Olsen and O. V. Pictet (1996), ‘Changing Time Scale for Short-term Forecasting in Financial Markets’, Journal of Forecasting, 15(3), 203–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. and J. G. MacKinnon (1993), Estimation and Inference in Econometrics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drost, F. and T. Nijman (1993), ‘Temporal Aggregation of GARCH Processes’, Econometrica, 61, 909–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F. (1982), ‘Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of U. K. Inflation’, Econometrica, 50, 987–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F. and T. Bollerslev (1986), ‘Modelling the Persistence of Conditional Variances’, Econometric Reviews, 5, 1–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. and J. Y. Park (1988), ‘On the Formulation of Wald Tests of Nonlinear Restrictions’, Econometrica, 56(5), 1065–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Press, W. H., S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling and B. P Flannery (1992), Numerical Recipes in C. The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zumbach, G. (2000). The Pitfalls in Fitting Garch(1,1) Processes. In: Dunis, C.L. (eds) Advances in Quantitative Asset Management. Studies in Computational Finance, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4389-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4389-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6974-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4389-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics