Skip to main content

Fat Tails and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

  • Chapter
Book cover Advances in Quantitative Asset Management

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Finance ((SICF,volume 1))

Abstract

Much of the theory of modern finance is based on the assumption that returns follow a multivariate normal distribution. It continues to be widely used mainly for its convenience and tractability despite the growing body of research that suggests that returns on financial assets have distributions with fat tails. Since 1982, there have been many papers which model fat tails using versions and/or developments of the ARCH family of models. More recently, several empirical studies have provided support for the idea that returns on a financial asset follow a Student’s t distribution. However, to date the majority, although not all, of this work has been univariate in nature.

In this paper, we propose the multivariate Student t distribution as a model for asset returns. In addition to its motivation as an empirical model, the paper uses the fact that the multivariate Student distribution arises as a consequence of a Bayesian approach applied to the standard multivariate normal model. The paper describes the general model and its key properties, including some of the implications for portfolio selection. Also described is a model which is the Student form of the market model. This model is similar in structure to the familiar market model, but possesses the property that stock specific volatility is time varying. The Student market model is fitted to monthly data on returns on S&P500 stocks. The paper shows that, for the time period considered, the estimated degrees of freedom in the multivariate Student model is approximately 25 and that there is a substantial effect on estimates of beta and stock specific volatility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adcock, C. J. and K. Shutes (1998), ‘Bayesian Portfolio Selection’, Paper presented at Northern Finance Association Conference, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aparicio, F. and J. Estrada (1997), ‘An Empirical Study of Probability Distributions for European Stock Returns’, Proceedings of the BNP-Imperial College Conference on Forecasting Financial Markets, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo, J. M. and A. F. M. Smith (1994), Bayesian Theory, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blattberg, R. and N. Gonedes (1974), ‘A Comparison of the Stable and Student Distributions as Statistical Models for Stock Prices’, Journal of Business, 47, 244–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, T. (1986), ‘Generalised Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity’, Journal of Econometrics, 21, 307–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, G. (1983), ‘A Characterisation of the Distributions that Imply Mean-Variance Utility Functions’, Journal of Economic Theory, 29, 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. (1982), ‘Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of U.K. Inflation’, Econometrica, 50, 987–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. L. and S. Kotz (1972), Distributions in Statistics, Continuous Multivariate Distributions-2, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallberg, J. G. and W. T. Ziemba (1983), ‘Comparison of Alternative Functions in Portfolio Selection Problems’, Management Science, 11, 1257–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, H. and H. M. Markowitz (1979), ‘Approximating Expected Utility by a Function of Mean and Variance’, American Economic Review, 69, 308–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauleon, I. and J. Perote (1997), ‘Testing Densities with Financial Data: An Empirical Comparison of the Edgeworth-Sargan Density to the Student’s t’, Proceedings of the BNP-Imperial College Conference on Forecasting Financial Markets, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettengill, G. N., S. Sundaram and I. Mathur (1995), ‘The Conditional Relation Between Beta and Returns’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 30, 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Praetz, P. (1972), ‘The Distribution of Share Price Changes’, Journal of Business, 45, 49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. W. (1964) ‘Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large’, Econometrica, 32, 122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Adcock, C.J., Shutes, K. (2000). Fat Tails and the Capital Asset Pricing Model. In: Dunis, C.L. (eds) Advances in Quantitative Asset Management. Studies in Computational Finance, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4389-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4389-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6974-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4389-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics