Abstract
Much of the theory of modern finance is based on the assumption that returns follow a multivariate normal distribution. It continues to be widely used mainly for its convenience and tractability despite the growing body of research that suggests that returns on financial assets have distributions with fat tails. Since 1982, there have been many papers which model fat tails using versions and/or developments of the ARCH family of models. More recently, several empirical studies have provided support for the idea that returns on a financial asset follow a Student’s t distribution. However, to date the majority, although not all, of this work has been univariate in nature.
In this paper, we propose the multivariate Student t distribution as a model for asset returns. In addition to its motivation as an empirical model, the paper uses the fact that the multivariate Student distribution arises as a consequence of a Bayesian approach applied to the standard multivariate normal model. The paper describes the general model and its key properties, including some of the implications for portfolio selection. Also described is a model which is the Student form of the market model. This model is similar in structure to the familiar market model, but possesses the property that stock specific volatility is time varying. The Student market model is fitted to monthly data on returns on S&P500 stocks. The paper shows that, for the time period considered, the estimated degrees of freedom in the multivariate Student model is approximately 25 and that there is a substantial effect on estimates of beta and stock specific volatility.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adcock, C. J. and K. Shutes (1998), ‘Bayesian Portfolio Selection’, Paper presented at Northern Finance Association Conference, Toronto.
Aparicio, F. and J. Estrada (1997), ‘An Empirical Study of Probability Distributions for European Stock Returns’, Proceedings of the BNP-Imperial College Conference on Forecasting Financial Markets, London.
Bernardo, J. M. and A. F. M. Smith (1994), Bayesian Theory, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
Blattberg, R. and N. Gonedes (1974), ‘A Comparison of the Stable and Student Distributions as Statistical Models for Stock Prices’, Journal of Business, 47, 244–280.
Bollerslev, T. (1986), ‘Generalised Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity’, Journal of Econometrics, 21, 307–328.
Chamberlain, G. (1983), ‘A Characterisation of the Distributions that Imply Mean-Variance Utility Functions’, Journal of Economic Theory, 29, 185–201.
Engle, R. (1982), ‘Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of U.K. Inflation’, Econometrica, 50, 987–1007.
Johnson, N. L. and S. Kotz (1972), Distributions in Statistics, Continuous Multivariate Distributions-2, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
Kallberg, J. G. and W. T. Ziemba (1983), ‘Comparison of Alternative Functions in Portfolio Selection Problems’, Management Science, 11, 1257–1276.
Levy, H. and H. M. Markowitz (1979), ‘Approximating Expected Utility by a Function of Mean and Variance’, American Economic Review, 69, 308–317.
Mauleon, I. and J. Perote (1997), ‘Testing Densities with Financial Data: An Empirical Comparison of the Edgeworth-Sargan Density to the Student’s t’, Proceedings of the BNP-Imperial College Conference on Forecasting Financial Markets, London.
Pettengill, G. N., S. Sundaram and I. Mathur (1995), ‘The Conditional Relation Between Beta and Returns’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 30, 101–116.
Praetz, P. (1972), ‘The Distribution of Share Price Changes’, Journal of Business, 45, 49–55.
Pratt, J. W. (1964) ‘Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large’, Econometrica, 32, 122–136.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Adcock, C.J., Shutes, K. (2000). Fat Tails and the Capital Asset Pricing Model. In: Dunis, C.L. (eds) Advances in Quantitative Asset Management. Studies in Computational Finance, vol 1. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4389-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4389-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6974-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4389-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive