Abstract
Military command and control (C2), air traffic control, and nuclear power plant control rooms are examples of distributed supervisory control systems. Distributed supervisory control systems are hierarchical and cooperative. They involve remote supervisors who work through intelligent local actors to control some process. A remote supervisor typically provides plans and procedures to multiple local actors. However, these plans and procedures are often inadequate to cope with the unanticipated variability of local situations (Woods & Roth, 1988). As a result, local actors must adapt the plans and procedures to the situation based on their understanding of the remote supervisor’s intent. The research reported here investigated how remote supervisors (senior commanders) who are separated by both time and space from local actors (subordinate commanders) impart their presence by communicating intent to permit coordination and adaptation of underspecified plans and procedures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ashby, W R (1956) An introduction to cybernetics New York Wiley.
Fischoff, B, & Johnson, S (1990) The possibility of distributed decision making In Committee on Human Factors, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, & National Research Council (Eds), Distributed decision making Report of a workshop (pp 25–58) Washington, DC National Academy Press
Klein, G A (1993) Characteristics of commander’s intent statements In Proceedings of the 1993 Symposium on Command and Control Research (pp 62–69) McLean, VA Science Applications International.
Reason, J. (1990) Human error New York Cambridge University Press
Rich, E, & Knight, K (1991) Artificial intelligence New York McGraw-Hill
Roth, E. M, Bennett, K B, & Woods, D D (1987) Human interaction with an “intelligent” machine International Journal of Man—Machine Studies, 27,479–525.
Suchman, L. (1987) Plans and situated actions The problem of human—machine communication Cambndge, U K Cambndge University Press
United States (1993) Operations (Field Manual 100–5) Washington, DC Department of the Army.
Van Creveld, M (1985) Command in war Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press
Woods, D D (1994) Observations from studying cognitive systems in context In A Ram & K Eiselt (Eds), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (Part II, Section A Keynote Address) Mahwah, NJ Erlbaum
Woods, D D, O’Brien, J. F, Hanes, L F (1987) Human factors challenges in process control. The case of nuclear power plants In G Salvendy (Ed), Handbook of Human Factors (pp 1724–1770) New York Wiley
Woods, D D, & Roth, E M. (1988) Cognitive systems engineering In M Helander (Ed), Handbook of human—computer interaction (pp 3–43) Amsterdam Elsevier
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shattuck, L.G., Woods, D.D. (2000). Communication of Intent in Military Command and Control Systems. In: McCann, C., Pigeau, R. (eds) The Human in Command. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4229-2_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4229-2_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6899-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4229-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive