Abstract
Decision making is a central aspect of command and control, yet it has received very little systematic study. One reason for this neglect may be the lack of a conceptual framework with which to guide research. This chapter presents an initial attempt to develop such a framework, one that has been inspired by a frequently cited quotation from the elder Moltke, a well-known 19th-century military commander (Hughes, 1993). Simpkin (1985) provides what I believe is the best interpretation of Moltke’s viewpoint:
Moltke maintained that the operational plan should seek to insure that the first contact between the main bodies occurred under the most favourable circumstances possible, and that “no plan survive[s] contact ” After this, it was a matter of responsiveness and opportunism (p 14)
The quote suggests two different kinds of military decision making. The first one, planning, is clear enough. But what happens once the plan is put in place, and contact is initiated with the enemy? I propose that at this point, the form of control changes. Specifically, it changes from feedforward control (by means of the plan) to feedback control—where the military must respond to the enemy’s response to its actions. The decision task now becomes dynamic. Viewing command and control from this new perspective—that is, as dynamic decision making—might give us some insights.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ashby, W R (1956) An introduction to cybernetics New York Wiley
Augustine, Saint (1983) Fran Bekannelser (Bok XI) [From Confessiones (Book XI)] (H. Lyttkens, Trans) In K Marc-Wogau, (Ed), Filosofin genom uderna [The development of philosophy] (pp 322–338) Stockholm Bonniers (Original work published 397)
Axelrod, R (1976) Results In R Axelrod (Ed), The structure of decision The cognitive maps of political elites (pp. 221–248) Pnnceton, NJ Princeton University Press
Bainbridge, L (1981) Mathematical equations or processing routines? In J. Rasmussen & W B Rouse (Eds), Human detection and diagnosis of systems failures (pp 259–286) New York Plenum Press
Brehmer, B (1992) Dynamic decision making Human control of complex systems Acta Psychologica, 81,211–241
Brehmer, B (1995a) Feedback delays in complex dynamic tasks In P A Frensch & J Funke (Eds), Complex problem solving The European perspective (pp 103–130) Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum
Brehmer, B (1995b). Mansklig styrning av komplexa system [Human control of complex systems] (MDA Report) Stockholm Arbetsmillofonden
Brehmer, B (1998) Mentala modeller Operatorers kunskap om dynamiska, komplexa och ogenomskinliga system [Mental models Operators’ knowledge about dynamic, complex and in-transparent systems] Unpublished manuscnpt, Swedish National Defence College, Stockholm.
Brehmer, B, & Allard, R. (1991) Real time, dynamic decision making: The effects of complexity and feedback delays In J. Rasmussen, B Brehmer, & J Leplat (Eds), Distributed decision making Cognitive models of cooperative work (pp 319–334) New York Wiley.
Clausewitz, K von (1976) On war (P Paret and M Howard, Trans) Princeton, NJ. Princeton University Press (Onginal work published 1833)
Coakley, T. P (1991). Command and control for war and peace Washington, DC National Defense University Press
Dixon, N F (1976) On the psychology of military incompetence. London, U.K. Futura
Domer, D (1996) The logic of failure New York Metropolitan Books.
Domer, D., Kreuzig, H. W, Reither, F, & Staudel, T. (Eds.) (1983) Lohhausen Vom Umgang mit Unbestimmtheit and Komplexitat [Lohhausen On dealing with uncertainty and complexity]. Bern, Switzerland Huber
Forrester, J W (1971). Counterintuitive behavior of social systems Technology Review, 73, 52–68
Frensch, P A, & Funke, J (Eds) (1995). Complex problem solving The European perspective Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum
Hughes, D J (Ed) (1993) Moltke on the art of war. Novato, CA: Presidio Press
Jansson, A (1995). Strategies in dynamic decision making Does teaching heunstic strategies by instruction affect performance? In J-P Cavern’, M Bar-Hillel, F H Barron, & H. Jungermann (Eds), Contributions to decision making I (pp 213–232) Amsterdam Elsevier
Keegan, J (1987) The mask of command New York Viking
Klein, G A, Orasanu, J, Calderwood, R, & Zsambok, C E (Eds) (1993) Decision making in action Models and methods Norwood, NJ Ablex
Rigas, G (1998) Decision making processes in a simulated ecological system Manuscript submitted for publication, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
Rogers, Y, Rutherford, A, & Bibby, P A (Eds) (1992) Models in the mind Theory, perspective, and application London, U K Academic Press
Schaub, H, & Strohschneider, S (1989) Die Rolle heuristischen Wissens beim Umgang mit einem komplexen Problem oder Konnen Manager wirklich besser managen’ [The role of heunstic knowledge when interacting with a complex problem—or Are managers really able to manage9] (Memorandum 71). Bamberg, Germany Lehstuhl Psychologie II
Senge, P, & Sterman, J D (1992) Systems thinking and organizational learning Acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future European Journal of Operational Research, 59,137–150
Simon, H A (1956) Rational choice and the structure of the environment Psychological Review, 63,129–138.
Simpkin, R E (1985) Race to the swift Thoughts on twenty-first century warfare London: Brassey’s Defence Publishers
Sperandio, J (1978) The regulation of working methods as a function of work-load among air traffic controllers Ergonomics, 21, 195–202
Svensson, S (1998) Solving tactical problems using control engineering Systems identification and modeling (Report 10 17) Lund, Sweden Lund University, Department of Fire Safety Engineering
Tisdale, T (1992) Self-reflection and its part in action regulation In B Brehmer & J Leplat (Eds), Simulations, evaluation and models Proceedings of the Fourth MOHAWC [Modeling of Human Action in Work Contexts] Workshop (pp 78–89) Roskilde, Denmark Riso National Laboratory.
Toates, F (1975) Control theory in biology and experimental psychology London, U K Hutchinson.
Tversky, A, & Kahneman, D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty Heuristics and biases Science, 185,1124–1131
Watts, B D (1996) Clausewitzian friction and future war (McNair Paper 52) Washington, DC National Defense University, Institute for National Strategic Studies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brehmer, B. (2000). Dynamic Decision Making in Command and Control. In: McCann, C., Pigeau, R. (eds) The Human in Command. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4229-2_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4229-2_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6899-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4229-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive