Abstract
Battle command as conceived of by the United States Army consists of leadership and decision making. This chapter deals with the thinking that contributes to the decision-making function. The chapter’s aim is to indicate how the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences (ARI) has investigated battle command thinking and what ARI has found out about thinking that can improve an officer’s command performance. The research depicts the complexities of instrumental processes and emphasizes the importance of situational factors, individual experience, beliefs, and attitudes. In the past, instructional materials for commanders have been based on formal models of thinking; however, the research descnbed here conforms to less formal assumptions. The informal approach comes from areas referred to aseveryday thinkingandnaturalistic decision making.This area of study has started to delineate important understandings about cognitive processes in battle command. Efforts that have been taken to improve thinking for battle command are summarized here, and broad research issues are identified.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cohen, M S, Freeman, J T., & Thompson, B B (1997) Training the naturalistic decision maker In C E Zsambok & G Klein (Eds)Naturalistic decision makingMahwah, NJ Erlbaum
Fallesen, J J (1993)Overview of Army tactical planning performance research(Technical Report 984) Alexandna, VA U S Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences
Fallesen, J J (1996) Understanding and improving tactical problem solving InU S. Army Research Institute Principal Scientist Colloquium Special Report 26Alexandria, VA U S Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences
Fallesen, J. J, Lussier, J W, & Michel, R R (1992)Tactical command and control process(Research Product 92–06) Alexandria, VA U S Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences
Fallesen, J. J, Michel, R R., Lussier, J W, & Pounds, J (1996)Practical thinking. Innovation in battle command instruction(Technical Report 1037) Alexandna, VA. U.S Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences
Fallesen, J J, & Pounds, J (1998, May)Identifying and testing a naturalistic approach for.cognitive skill trainingPaper presented at the Fourth Conference on Naturalistic Decision Making, Warrenton, VA
Galotti, K M (1989) Approaches to studying formal and everyday reasoningPsychological Bulletin 105,331–351.
Klein, G A (1993) A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making In G A Klein, J Orasanu, R Calderwood, & C E Zsambok (Eds)Decision making in action Models and methods(pp 138–147) Norwood, NJ Ablex
Lussier, J W (1992).Early decisions and concurrent option comparison in problem solving groups(Research Report 1618) Alexandria, VA U S Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences
Montgomery, H. (1993) The search for a dominance structure in decision making Examining the evidence. In G A Klein, J Orasanu, R. Calderwood, and C E Zsambok (Eds)Decision making in action Models and methods(pp. 182–187) Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Paul, R (1993)Critical thinking- How to prepare students for a rapidly changing worldSanta Rosa, CA Foundation for Cntical Thinking
Pounds, J., & Fallesen, J J (1994)Understanding problem solving strategies(Technical Report 1020) Alexandna, VA U S Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences
Pounds, J, & Fallesen, J J (1997)Problem solving of mid-career Army officers Identification of general and specific strategies(Research Note 97–21) Alexandna, VA U S Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences
Pounds, J, & Fallesen, J. J (in press)Problem solving of mid-career Army officers Identifying natural reasoning(Technical Report) Alexandna, VA: U S Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences
Schmitt, J F (1994)Mastering tactics A tactical decision game workbookQuantico, VA: Manne Corps Association
United States (1984).Staff organization and operations(Field Manual 101–5) Washington, DC: Department of the Army
Walton, D. N (1990)Practical reasoning Goal-driven knowledge-based action-guiding argumentation Savage, MD Rowman and Littlefield
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fallesen, J.J. (2000). Developing Practical Thinking for Battle Command. In: McCann, C., Pigeau, R. (eds) The Human in Command. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4229-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4229-2_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6899-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4229-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive