Skip to main content

Dissemination of Innovation as Social Change

  • Chapter
Handbook of Community Psychology

Abstract

For community psychology, the phrase “dissemination of innovation” implies the use of new social programs or social policies. As such, it also implies the potential for broad-scale change. It typically addresses how individuals and organizations can improve their approach to particular problems. Hence, for community psychologists interested in promoting human welfare, this paradigm offers an approach to the study and creation of social change (e.g., Rappaport, 1977; Fairweather & Davidson, 1986). If solution of a social problem is the goal of an innovation, then dissemination and implementation of that innovation on a wide scale may mean that important steps have been accomplished (Fairweather & Tornatzky, 1977)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aiken, M., & Hage, J. (1971). The organic organization and innovation. Sociology, 5, 563–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ascione, F. J., Kirking, D. M., Wenzloff, N. J., Foley, T. A., & Kwok, D. K. (1987). Effect of innovation characteristics on pharmacists’ use of written patient medication information. Patient Education & Counseling, 9, 53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backer, T. E., & Rogers, E. M. (1998). Diffusion of innovations theory and work-site AIDS programs. Journal of Health Communication, 3, 17–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baldridge, J. V., & Burnham, R. A. (1975). Organizational innovation: individual, organizational and environmental impacts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20,165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, H. G. (1953). Innovation: The basis of cultural change New York: McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, L. K., Parcel, G. S., & Kok, G. (1998). Intervention mapping: A process for developing theory and evidence based health education programs. Behavior, 25, 545–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Basch, C. E., Eveland, J. D., & Portnoy, B. (1986). Diffusion systems for education and learning about health. Family and Community Health, 9, 1–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, L. J., Stein, R. E., & Ireys, H. T. (1991). Reinventing fidelity: The transfer of social technology among settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 619–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, P. (1978). The study of macro-and micro-implementation. Public Policy, 26,157–184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, P. (1980). Thinking about programmed and adaptive implementation: Matching strategies to situations. In D. Mann and H. Ingram (Eds.), Why policies succeed or fail (pp. 205–227). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational change: Implementing and sustaining innovations Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation. R-1589/8-HEW

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, J. M., & Trice, H. M. (1978). Implementing change: Alcoholism policies in work organizations New York: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakely, C. H., Mayer, J. P., Gottschalk, R. G., Schmitt, N., Davidson, W. S., Roitman, D. B., & Emshoff, J. G. (1987). The fidelity-adaptation debate: Implications for the implementation of public sector social programs. American Journal of Community Psychology,15, 253–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boruch, R. F., & Gomez, H. (1977). Sensitivity, bias and theory in impact evaluations. Professional Psychology, 8, 411–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brink, S. G., Levenson-Gingiss, P., & Gottlieb, N. H. (1991). An evaluation of the effectiveness of a planned diffusion process: The Smoke-Free Class of 2000 Project in Texas. Health Education Research, 6, 353–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brink, S. G., Basen-Engquist, K. M., O’Hara-Tompkins, N. M., Parcel, G. S., Gottlieb, N. H., & Lovato, C. Y. (1995). Diffusion of an effective tobacco prevention program: Part 1: Evaluation of the dissemination phase. Health Education Research, 10, 283–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brunk, S. E., & Goeppinger, J. (1990). Assessing reinvention of community-based interventions. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 13,186–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation London: Tavistock

    Google Scholar 

  • Calsyn, R., Tornatzky, L. G., & Dittmar, S. (1977). Incomplete adoption of an innovation: The case of goal attainment scaling. Evaluation, 4,128–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabati, A. K. (1974). The role of champion in project innovation. California Management Review, 17, 58–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapko, M. K. (1991). Time to adoption of an innovation by dentists in private practice: Sealant utilization. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 5, 144–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charters, W. W., & Jones, J. E. (1973). On the risk of appraising non-events in program evaluation. Educational Researcher, 12, 5–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Charters, W. W., & Pellegrin, R. J. (1973). Barriers to the innovation process: Four case studies of differential staffing. Educational Administration Quarterly,17, 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Coch, L., & French, J. R. (1948). Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations, 15, 512–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockerill, R., & Barnsley, J. (1997). Innovation theory and its applicability to our understanding of the diffusion of new management practices in health care organizations. Healthcare Management Forum, 10, 35–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage-can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17,1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, J. A., Silversin, J. B., & Drolefte, M. E. (1980). Policy research related to the diffusion of medical; technologies. Journal of Dental Education, 44, 520–525

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, K. M., Jaen, C. R., & Funch, D. P. (1984). Family physicians’ beliefs about screening for colorectal; cancer using the stool guaiac slide test. Public Health Reports, 99, 307–312

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta, L. E. (1981). Damn the experts and full speed ahead. Evaluation Review, 55, 5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, W. S., Redner, R., & Saul, J. (1983). Research modes in social and community change. In E. Seidman (Ed.), Handbook of social intervention (pp. 99–118). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing, J. W., Meyer, G., & Rogers, E. M. (1994). Diffusion theory and HIV risk behavior change. In R. J. DiClemente, & J. L. Peterson (Eds.), Preventing AIDS: Theories and methods of behavioral interventions (pp. 79–93). New York: Plenum

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, M., de Vries, H., & Parcel, G. S. (1993). The linkage approach applied to a school-based smoking prevention program in The Netherlands. Journal of School Health, 63, 339–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, G. W. (1978). Complexity and innovation research. In M. Radnor, I. Feller, and E. M. Rogers (Eds.), The diffusion of innovations: An assessment (pp. 1–21). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, G. W., & Mohr, L. B. (1976). Conceptual issues in the study of innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 700–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, G. W., & Mohr, L. B. (1979). Toward a theory of innovation. Administration and Society, 10, 329–408. Ellickson, P., & Petersilia, J. (1983). Implementing new ideas in criminal justice Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation

    Google Scholar 

  • Emrick, J. A. (1977). Evaluation of the national diffusion network Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Research Institute. Ettlie, J. E. (1980). Adequacy of stage models for decisions on adoption of innovation. Psychological Reports, 46,991–995

    Google Scholar 

  • Eveland, J. D. (1979). Issues in using the concept of adoption of innovations. Journal of Technology Transfer,4, 1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eveland, J. D., Rogers, E. M., & Klepper, C. M. (1977). The innovation process in public organizations: Some elements of a preliminary model Ann Arbor: University of Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, G. W. (1972). Social change: The challenge to survival. Secaucus, NJ: General Learning Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, G. W., & Davidson, W. S. (1986). An introduction to community experimentation: Theory methods and practice New York: McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, G. W., Sanders, D. H., & Tornatzky, L. G. (1974). Creating change in mental health New York: Pergamon

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, G. W., & Tornatzky, L. G. (1977). Experimental methods for social policy research New York: Pergamon

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, L., & Hackman, J. R. (1975). A failure of job enrichment: The case of the change that wasn’t. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 11, 413–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M., & Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on curriculum instruction and implementation. Review of Educational Research, 47,335–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, T., & Backer, T. (1977). Innovation redefined: Durability and local adaptation. Evaluation, 4, 131–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, T., & Backer, T. (1980). Durability of innovations: How goal Attainment scaling programs fared over time. Community Mental Health Journal, 16, 130–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R. M., Tenney, M., Smith, D. & Steckler, A. (1992). The adoption process for health curriculum innovation in schools: A case study. Journal of Health Education,23, 215–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R. M., & Steckler, A. (1989). A framework for assessing program institutionalization. Knowledge,2, 57–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R. M., & Steckler, A. (1989). A model for the institutionalization of health promotion programs. Family and Community Health, 11, 63–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R. M., McLeRoy, K. R., Steckler, A., & Hoyle, R. H. (1993). Development of Level of Institutionalization Scales for health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly, 20,161–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. W. (1989). Is institutionalization the proper goal of grantmaking? American Journal of Health Promotion, 3,43–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. W., Johnson, J. L. (1996). Dissemination and utilization of health promotion and disease prevention knowledge: Theory, research and experience. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 87, (Supp12), S11–S17

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. W., & McAlister, A. L. (1984). Macro intervention to support health behavior: Some theoretical perspectives and practical reflections. Health Education Quarterly, 11, 323–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, A. L. (1977). Advances in the study of diffusion of innovation in health care organizations. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly,55, 505–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, N. G., Gianquinta, J. B., & Bernstein, M. (1971). Implementing organizational innovations New York: Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. (1968). Diffusion of innovations. Educational Leadership, 25,292–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Hage, J. (1980). Theories of organization New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1970). Social change in complex organizations New York: Random House

    Google Scholar 

  • Hage, J., & Dewar, R. (1973). Elite values versus organizational structure in predicting innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18,27–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hage, G. E., & Loucks, S. E (1978). Innovation configurations: Analyzing the adaptation of innovations Presented at the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Harveyberino, J., Ewing, J. F., Flynn, B., & Wick, J. R. (1998). Statewide dissemination of a nutrition program: Showthe-Way to 5-A-Day. Journal of Nutrition Education,30, 29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havelock, R. G. (1973). Planning for innovation through dissemination and utilization of knowledge Ann Arbor: Center for Research on Utilization of Scientific Knowledge, University of Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, S., Steigelbauer, S., Hall, G. E., & Loucks, S. F. (1981). Measuring innovation configurations: Procedures and applications Austin: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollisfield, J. H., & Slavin, R. E. (1983). Disseminating student team learning through federally funded programs. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization,4, 576–589

    Google Scholar 

  • House, E. R., Kerins, T., & Steele, J. M. (1972). A test of the research and development model of change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 8, 1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howze, E. H., & Redman, L. J. (1992). The uses of theory in health advocacy: Policies and programs. Health Education Quarterly, 19,368–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. (1982). Evaluation of curriculum innovations: A product validation approach. In R. Lehming, & M. Kane (Eds.), Improving schools: Using what we know (pp. 79–99). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd Ed.) New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivlin, J. E., & Fliegel, E C. (1967). Differential perceptions of innovations and rate of adoption. Rural Sociology, 32, 78–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Laflin, M., Edmundson, E. W., & Moore-Hirsh, S. (1995). Enhancing adoption of an alcohol prevention program: An application of diffusion theory. Journal of Primary Prevention,16, 75–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaPiere, R. T. (1965). Social change New York: McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, J. K., & Agarwala-Rogers, R. (1977). Reinvention of innovative ideas. Evaluation,4, 136–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P. R., Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 1–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. A., & Montgomery, D. J. (1980). Evaluating program implementation. Evaluation Review, 4,193–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, W. H., & Lowery, L. E (1979). Was there really an experiment? Educational Researcher, 8, 4–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindbladh, E., Lyttkens C. H., Hanson, B. S., & Ostergren, P. O. (1997). The diffusion model and the socialhierarchical process of change. Health Promotion International, 12,323–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19,79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litwak, E. (1961). Models of bureaucracy which permit conflict. American Journal of Sociology, 67, 177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks, S. F., Newlove, B., & Hall, G. E. (1975). Measuring levels of use of an innovation: A manual Austin: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J. P., & Blakely, C. H. (1984). Implementation and outcome in criminal justice innovation Presented at the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J. P., Blakel, C. H., & Davidson, W. S. (1986). Social program innovation and dissemination: A study of organizational processes. Policy Studies Review, 6, 273–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAlister, A. L. (1991). Population behavior change, A theory-based approach. Journal of Public Health Policy, 12(3), 345–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, L. K., Steckler, A. B., & McLeroy, K. R. (1995). Diffusion of innovations in schools: A study of adoption and implementation of school-based tobacco prevention curricula. American Journal of Health Promotion, 9, 210–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, H. (1960). Innovation, integration and marginality: A survey of physicians. American Sociological Review, 25, 704–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. L., & Eckholdt, H. M. (1998). HIV prevention with male prostitutes and patrons of hustler bars: Replication of an HIV preventive intervention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26,97–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mirvis, E, & Berg, D. (1977). Failure in organizational development and change New York: Wiley Interscience

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L. B. (1969). Determinants of innovation in organizations. American Political Science Review, 63, 111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L. S. (1982). Explaining organizational behavior San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

    Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, J. L., & Scheirer, M. A. (1988). The role of linking agents in the diffusion of promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly, 15, 417–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., & Yates, D. (1978). Innovation and implementation in public organizations Lexington, MA: Lexington Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldenburg, B., Hardcastle, D. M., & Kok, G. (1997). Diffusion of innovations. In K. Glanz, F. M. Lewis, & B. Rimer (Eds.), Health behavior and health education 2nd ed. (pp. 270–286). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, H. M., (1998). Patterns in the diffusion of strategies across organization: Insights from the innovation diffusion literature. Academy of Management Review,23, 98–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, T. R., & Haenn, J. F. (1979). Assessing the degree of implementation of experience-based career education programs Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine-Andrews, A., Vincent, M. L., Fawcett, S. B., & Campuzano, M. K. (1996). Replication of a community initiative for preventing adolescent pregnancy. Family and Community Health, 19,14–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palumbo, D. J., Maynard-Moody, S., & Wright, P. (1984). Measuring degrees of successful implementation: Achieving policy versus statutory goals. Evaluation Review, 8, 45–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parcel, G. S., O’Harra-Tompkins, N. M., Harrist, R. B., Basen-Engquist, K. M., McCormick, L. K., Gottlieb, N. H., & Eriksen, M. P. (1995). Diffusion off an effective tobacco prevention program: Part II: Evaluation of the adoption phase. Health Education Research, 10, 297–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parcel, G. S., Perry, C. L., & Taylor, W. C. (1990). Beyond demonstration: Diffusion of health promotion innovations. In N. Bracht (Ed.), Health promotion at the community level,(pp. 229–251). Newbury Park, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Parcel, G. S., Taylor, W. C., Brink, S. G., & Gottlieb, N. (1989). Translating theory into practice: Intervention strategies for the diffusion of a health promotion innovation. Family and Community Health, 12,1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. L., & Kraemer, K. L. (1980). Chief executive support and innovation adoption. Administration and Society, 12, 158–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portnoy, B., Anderson, D. M., & Ericksen, M. P. (1989). Application of diffusion theory to health promotion research. Family and Community Health, 12,63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, J. L., & Wildaysky, A. B. (1973). Implementation Berkeley: University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Radnor, M., Feller, J., & Rogers, E. M. (1978). The diffusion of innovations: An assessment Evanston, IL: Northwestern University

    Google Scholar 

  • Raizen, S. A. (1979). Dissemination programs at the National Institute of Education. Knowledge, 1,259–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1977). Community psychology: Values, research and action. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, R. E., & Rogers, E. M. (1980). Reinvention in the innovation process. Knowledge, 1, 499–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations, 3rd ed. New York: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1993). Diffusion and reinvention of project D.A.R.E. In T. E. Backer, E. M. Rogers (Eds.), Organizational aspects of health communication campaigns: What works? (pp. 139–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. E (1971). Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach New York: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Roitman, D., Gottschalk, R, Mayer, J. P., & Blakely, C. H. (1983). Implementation of social program innovations in public sector organizations. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2, 68–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Roitman, D., & Mayer, J. P. (1982). Fidelity and reinvention in the implementation of innovations Paper presented at the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, J. (1974). Planning and organizing for social change: Action principles from social science research New York: Columbia University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, B., & Gross, N. C. (1943). The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociology, 8,15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheirer, M. A. (1982). Program implementation: The organizational context. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheirer, M. A., & Rezmovic, E. (1983). Measuring the implementation of innovations. Evaluation Review, 7, 599–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheirer, M. A. (1990). The life cycle of an innovation: Adoption versus discontinuation of the fluoride mouth rinse program schools. Journal of Health and Social Behavior,31, 203–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sechrest, L., & Redner, R. (1978). Strength and integrity of treatments. In Review of Criminal Evaluation Results (pp. 19–62). Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of Justice

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, H. A. (1967). Innovation resisting and innovation producing organizations. Journal of Business, 40,470–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. W., Zhang, J. J., & Colwell, B. (1996). Pro-innovation bias: The case of the Giant Texas Smoke Screen. Journal of School Health, 66, 210–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steckler, A., & Goodman, R. M. (1989). How to institutionalize health promotion programs. American Journal of Health Promotion, 3,34–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steckler, A., Goodman, R. M., McLeroy, K. R., Davis, S., & Koch, G. (1992). Measuring the diffusion of innovative health promotion programs. American Journal of Health Promotion, 6,214–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, W. F., & Tornatzky, L. G. (1979). The dissemination of evaluation: An experiment. Evaluation Review, 4,339–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. B., Leite, B., & Duncan, T. (1998). Breaking the cycle of violence among youth living in metropolitan Atlanta: A case history of kids alive and loved. Health Education and Behavior,25, 160–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action New York: McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornatzky, L. G., Eveland, J. D., Boylan, M. G., Hetzner, W. A., Johnson, E. C., Roitman, D., & Schneider, J. (1983). The process of technological innovation: Reviewing the literature. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornatzky, L. G. (1982). Research on implementation: Implications for evaluation practice and evaluation policy Presented at Evaluation Research Society, Austin, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornatzky, L. G., Fergus, E. O., Avellar, J. W., Fairweather, G. W., & Fleischer, M. (1980). Innovation and social process New York: Pergamon

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,29, 28–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. (1975). Implementation analysis and assessment. Policy Analysis, 3, 531–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, K. (1993). Managerial style and health promotion programs. Social Science and Medicine,36, 227–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. R. (1978). Changing urban bureaucracies: How new practices become routinized. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1977). Production efficiency versus bureaucratic self-interest: Two innovative processes? Policy Sciences, 8, 381–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., & Holbek, J. (1973). Innovations and organizations New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mayer, J.P., Davidson, W.S. (2000). Dissemination of Innovation as Social Change. In: Rappaport, J., Seidman, E. (eds) Handbook of Community Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6881-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4193-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics