Abstract
We examined the effects of a moving background on the receptive field profiles of neurons in visual cortex of anesthetized macaque monkeys. An oscillating background pattern was presented entirely outside the classical receptive fieldtand the spatial sensitivity of the cell was mapped with small target stimuli flashed at different locations in the classical receptive field and at different phases relative to the background motion. Our results indicate that the receptive field profiles of many cells in area VI are modulated to a significant degree by background motion. In most of these cells, the motion-induced modulation is more complex than a simple change in gain or a translation in space.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adelson, E. H. and Bergen, J. R., Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 2 (1985), 284–299.
Allman, J.M., Miezin, F.M., McGuinness, E.R., Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field, Ann. Rev. Neurosci., 8 (1985) 407–430.
Allmann, J.M., Miezin, F.M., McGuiness, E.R., Effects of background motion on the responses of neurons in the first and second cortical visual areas. In Signal and Sense, Neuroscience Research Program Symposium, Alan R. Liss, New York, 1990.
Alloway, K.D., Rosenthal, P., Burton, H. Quantitative measurements of receptive-field changes during anatagonism of gabaergic transmission in primary somatosenory cortex of cats, Exp. Brain Res., 78 (1989), 514–532.
Anderson, C.H. and Van Essen, D.C., Shifter circuits: A computational strategy for dynamic aspects of visual processing, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 84 (1987), 6297–6301.
Dinse, H.R.O., Krüger, K., Best, J., A temporal structure of cortical information processing, Concepts in Neuroscience (1991) in press.
Clark, S.A., Allard, T., Jenkins, W.M. and Merzenich, M.M., Receptive fields in the body-surface map in adult cortex defined by temporally correlated inputs, Nature, 332 (1988), 444–445.
Emerson, R.C., Citron, M.C., Vaughn, W.J. and Klein, S.A., Nonlinear directionally selective subunits in complex cells of cat striate cortex, J. Neurophysiol, 58 (1987), 33–65.
Krüger, J., The shift-effect in the lateral geniculate body of the rhesus monkey, Exp. Brain Res., 18 (1977), 387–392.
McLean, J. and Palmer, L.A., Contribution of linear spatiotemporal receptive field structure to velocity selectivity of simple cells in area 17 of the cat, Vision Res., 29 (1989), 675–679.
Marrocco, R.T., McClurkin, J.W. and Young, R.A., Spatial summation and conduction latency classification of cells of the lateral geniculate nucleus of macaques, J. Neurosci., 2 (1982), 1275–1291.
Mcllwain, J.T., Receptive fields of optic tract axons and lateral geniculate cells: peripheral extent and barbiturate sensitivity, J. Neurophysiol., 27 (1964), 1154–1173.
Merzenich, M.M., Kaas, J.H., Wall, J.T., Nelson, RJ., Sur, M. and Felleman, D.J., Topographic reorganizaation of somatosensory cortical areas 3b and 1 in adult monkeys following restricted deafferentation, Neurosci., 8 (1983), 3–55.
Van Essen, D.C. and Anderson, C.H., Reference frames and dynamic remapping processes in vision. In: Computational Neuroscience, E. Schwartz (Ed.), MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1990.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fox, J.M., Van Essen, D.C., Delbrück, T., Gallant, J., Anderson, C.H. (1992). Dynamic aspects of receptive field organization in area VI of the macaque monkey. In: Eeckman, F.H. (eds) Analysis and Modeling of Neural Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4010-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4010-6_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6793-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4010-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive