Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series ((TREP,volume 6))

Abstract

Although proposals for price caps are numerous and varied, all subscribe to the common purpose of strengthening incentives for cost efficiencies. Indeed, at this level of generality, few question the potential for price caps to improve upon conventional rate of return regulation. Major complexities—and disagreements—arise in the process of moving price caps from the economic drawing board to actual practice. This paper will discuss one of the central implementation issues of most price-cap plans, namely, the need to adjust prices for increases in firm productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Productivity Center. Various years. Multiple Input Productivity Indexes. Houston, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • AT&T 1979. Bell System Productivity Study 1947–78 (November).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor and Statistics. 1987. Multifactor Productivity Measures, 1986 (October 13).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell Communications Research. 1988. “The Impact of the FCC Proposed Price Cap Plan on Interstate Consumers.” (August 18).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell Communications Research. 1988. “The Impact of the FCC Proposed Price Cap Plan on Interstate Consumers—Regional Disaggragation.” (September 8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussing, I. 1936. Public Utility Regulation and the So-Called Sliding Scale. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D., L. Christensen, and M. Trethway. 1981. “U.S. Trunk Carriers, 1972–77: A Multilateral Comparison of Total Factor Productivity.” In Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries, edited by T. Cowing and R. Stevenson. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L. 1981. “Testimony.” U.S. v. AT&T(C.A. 74–1698).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowing, T., J. Small, and R. Stevenson. 1981. “Comparative Measures of Total Factor Pruductivity in the Regulated Sector.” In Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries, edited by T. Cowing and R. Stevenson. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, E. 1962. “The Sources of Economic Growth in the United States.” New York: Committee for Economic Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denny, M., M. Fuss, and L. Waverman. 1981. “The Measurement and Interpretation of Total Factor Productivity in Regulated Industries, with an Application to Canadian Telecommunications.”In Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries, edited by T. Cowing and R. Stevenson. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denny, M., A. de Fontenay, and M. Werner. 1983. “Comparing the Efficiency of Firms.” In Economic Analysis of Telecommunications, edited by L. Courville, A. de Fontenay, and R. Dobell. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewart, W.E. 1976. “Exact and Superlative Index Numbers.” Journal of Econometrics 4(May):115–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diewart, W.E. 1978. “Superlative Index Numbers and Consistency in Aggregation.” Econometrica 46:889–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Communications Commission. 1987. “Policy and Rules Concerning Rates for Dominant Carriers.” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (August).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Comminications Commission. 1988. Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (May).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Communications Commission. 1989. Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (March).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Communications Commission. 1989. Final Oder (April).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollup, F., and M. Roberts. 1981. “The Sources of Economic Growth in the U.S. Electric Power Industry.” In Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries, edited by T. Cowing and R. Stevenson. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, John W. 1961. Productivity Trends in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, John W. 1984. Improving Company Productivity. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, Ferenc. 1983. “Productivity Gains in Bell Canada.” In Economic Analysis ofTelecommunications, edited by L. Courville, A. de Fontenay, and R. Dobell. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, Ferenc. 1989. “Constant and Variable Productivity Adjustments in Price Cap Regulation.” Bell Communications Reasearch, Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwoka, John E., Jr. 1988. “Design Criteria for Incentive Regulation.” In proceedings from District of Columbia Public Services Commission Symposium on “Competition and Technological Change in State Telephone Markets.” Washington, DC (October).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande, J., and P. Wynns (1987). “Primer and Sourcebook on Telephone Price Indexes and Rate Levels.” FCC (April).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadiri, M. Ishaq, and Mark Schankerman. 1981. “The Structure of Production, Technological Change, and the Rate of Growth of Total Productivity in the U.S. Bell System.” In Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries, edited by T. Cowing and R. Stevenson. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, Richard. 1979. The Control of Natural Monopolies. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kwoka, J.E. (1991). Productivity and Price Caps in Telecommunications. In: Einhorn, M.A. (eds) Price Caps and Incentive Regulation in Telecommunications. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series, vol 6. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3976-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3976-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6776-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-3976-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics