Abstract
A 18: It should be remembered that all packaging involves compromises. Since there are many aspects to the selection of a package—it is almost impossible to achieve a perfect combination of properties. Our answer will be restricted to protection, display, and utility.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Additional Reading
Anon. 1988. Comment: combating the anti-packaging lobby. Packaging Technology and Science 1 (1): 1–3.
Anon. 1977. Safety in eating due to packaging. Good Packaging 38 (9): 55.
Anon. 1977. Packaging—preserving and presenting new foods. Food Processing 38 (11): 46–50.
Anon. 1977. What users think of flexible packaging. Packaging Digest 14 (4): 20–21.
Anon. 1976. Flexibles: high barriers for fresh foods. Modern Packaging 49 (7): 21–24.
Anon. 1976. International conference on the protection of perishable goods through packaging. Neue Verpackung 29 (8): 798–801.
Irgel, L. 1977. Marketing: well packaged is half sold. Verpackungs Rundschau 28 (7): 932–934.
Pintauro, N. D. and Simah, A. H. 1976. Teamwork: your key to longer shelf life. Package Engineering 21 (4): 38–40.
Shaw, F. B. 1977. Toxicological considerations in the selection of flexible packaging materials for foodstuffs. Journal of Food Protection 40 (1): 65–68.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hirsch, A. (1991). Does the Package Improve the Product?. In: Flexible Food Packaging. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3908-7_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3908-7_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-442-00609-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-3908-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive