Skip to main content

Validation/Application of 32P-Postlabeling Analysis for the Detection of DNA Adducts Resulting from Complex Air Pollution Sources Containing PAHs and Nitrated PAHs

  • Chapter
Nitroarenes

Part of the book series: Environmental Science Research ((ESRH,volume 40))

  • 74 Accesses

Abstract

Two recent versions of the 32P-postlabeling assay (butanol extraction verses nuclease P1) have been employed to enhance the detection of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-modified DNA. Previously published studies suggest that the DNA adducts derived from N-substituted aryl compounds are poorly recovered in the nuclease P1 version of the 32P-postlabeling assay. Both versions were employed to ascertain whether the apparent differences in sensitivity could be used to diagnostically select for nitroaromatic-derived DNA adducts formed following in vitro (calf thymus DNA) and in vivo (rodent) exposure to complex air pollution particle extracts. DNA adduct levels and patterns of radioactivity were compared to examine putative DNA adducts resulting from treatment with combustion emission extracts with and without mono- or dinitropyrenes. Following topical application (50 mg) with nitrated PАН containing particle extract (diesel) and complex mixture particle extract without nitrated PAH’s (coke oven and coal soot) multiple DNA adducts were detected along a zone of radioactivity, irrespective of the version of the assay employed. The patterns of radioactivity, however, were characteristically different for each of the complex mixture-modified DNA samples. Nuclease P1-sensitive adducts were not apparent in any of the mouse skin DNA samples examined. In contrast, calf thymus DNA incubated with xanthine oxidase (XO) and nitrated-PAH containing particle extracts, resulted in the formation of DNA adducts detectable only by the butanol extraction version of the 32P-postlabeling assay. These nuclease P1-sensitive adducts were chromatographically similar to mono- and dinitropyrene-modified DNA adducts formed following in vitro incubation of rabbit tracheal epithelial cells (RTE) with 1,6- and 1,8 dinitropyrene (10 μM). Our data suggest that under optimal nitroreducing conditions, the in vitro calf thymus DNA model described in this study can enhance the diagnostic potential of the 32P-postlabeling assay by the identification of nuclease P1-sensitive, N-substituted aryl-derived DNA adducts from the array of PAH-adducts formed following in vivo exposure to a variety of air pollution particle extracts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R.C. Gupta, M.V. Reddy, and K. Randerath, 32P-postlabeling analysis of nonradioactive carcinogen-DNA adducts, Carcinogenesis 3: 1081–1092 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. M.V. Reddy, R.C. Gupta, E. Randerath, and K. Randerath, 32P-postlabeling for covalent DNA binding of chemicals in vivo:application to a variety of aromatic carcinogens and methylating agents, Carcinogenesis 5: 231–243 (1984).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. R.C. Gupta, Enhanced sensitivity of 32P-postlabeling analysis of aromatic carcinogen-DNA adducts, Can. Res. 45: 5656–5662 (1985).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. M.V. Reddy, and K. Randerath, Nuclease P1-mediated enhancement of sensitivity of 32P-postlabeling test for structurally diverse DNA adducts, Carcinogenesis 7: 1543–1551 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. H.S. Rosenkranz and R. Mermelstein, The genotoxicity, metabolism and carcinogenicity of nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, J. Environ. Sci. Health C3: 221–272 (1985).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. F.A. Beland, R.H. Heflich, P.C. Howard, and P.P Fu, The in vitro metabolic activation of nitro polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, In: “Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and Carcinogensis”, Harvey, R.G., (ed), American Chemical Society, Washington, DC. pp 371–396 (1985).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. J.E. Gallagher, I.C.G. Robertson, M.A. Jackson, A.M. Dietrich, L.M Ball, and J. Lewtas, 32P-postlabeling analysis of DNA adducts of two nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in rabbit tracheal epithelial cells, in: Carcinogenic and Mutagenic Responses to Aromatic Amines and Nitroamines, K.L.J. Ramano and D. Schuetzle, (eds) Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, Barking U.K. 277–281 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Lewtas, R.L. Bradlow, R.H. Jungers, B.D. Harris, and R.B. Zweiinger, Mutagenic and carcinogenic potency of extracts of diesel and related environmental emissions: Study design, sample generation,collection and preparation Environ. Intern. 5: 383–387, (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. R.E. Albert, J. Lewtas, S. Nesnow, T.W. Thorslund, and E. Anderson, Comparative potency method for cancer risk assessment: Application to diesel particle emissions. Risk Analysis, 3: 101–117 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Williams, C. Sparacino, B. Petersen, J. Bumgarner, R.H. Jungers, and J. Lewtas, Comparative characterization of organic emissions from diesel particles, coke oven mains, roofing tar vapors and cigarette smoke condensate, Intern. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 26: 27–49, (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. L.C. King, M. Jackson, L.M. Ball and J. Lewtas, Metabolism and DNA binding of 1-nitropyrene by isolated rabbit tracheal epithelial cells, Carcinogenesis 8: 675–682 (1987).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. D.M. Maron, and B.N. Ames, Revised methods for the salmonella mutagenicity test, Nut. Res. 113:173–215 (1983).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. R.C. Gupta, Nonrandom binding of the carcinogen N-hydroxy-2- acetylaminofluorene to repetitive sequences in rat liver DNA in vivo, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (81) 6943–6947 (1984).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. J.E. Gallagher, M.A. Jackson, M.H. George, J. Lewtas, I.C.G. Robertson, Differences in detection of DNA adducts in the 32P-postlabeling assay after either 1-butanol or nuclease P1 treatment, Can. Letters (45) 7–12 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Lewtas, Genotoxicity of complex mixtures: Strategies for the identification and comparative assessment of airborne mutagens and carcinogens from combustion sources, Fund. and Applied Toxicol. 571589, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  16. R.C. Gupta, and K. Early, 32P-postlabeling assay: Comparative recoveries of structurally diverse DNA adducts in the various enhancement procedures, Carcinogenesis, 9: 1687–1693, (1988).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gallagher, J.E., Kohan, M.J., George, M.H., Jackson, M.A., Lewtas, J. (1990). Validation/Application of 32P-Postlabeling Analysis for the Detection of DNA Adducts Resulting from Complex Air Pollution Sources Containing PAHs and Nitrated PAHs. In: Howard, P.C., Hecht, S.S., Beland, F.A. (eds) Nitroarenes. Environmental Science Research, vol 40. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3800-4_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3800-4_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6694-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-3800-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics