Skip to main content

Does Ro 03–8799 Concentration in Human Tumour Xenografts Predict Radiosensitization? Comparison with SR-2508

  • Chapter
Selective Activation of Drugs by Redox Processes

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NSSA,volume 198))

  • 101 Accesses

Abstract

Adams and Dewey1 have proposed the use of electron-affinic compounds to overcome radioresistance of hypoxic cells in solid tumours. Although experimental results were promising, most of the clinical trials performed with metronidazole or misonidazole were unable to demonstrate a radiosensitizing effect of these drugs. These disappointing clinical results have been attributed largely to the fact that doses administered to patients were limited to low levels because of neurotoxicity. Etanidazole (SR-2508) and pjmonidazole (Ro 03–8799) which are less neurotoxic than misonidazole (MISO), are promising. Ro 03 8799 is particularly interesting, results obtained with rodent tumours, human tumour xenografts as well as with human tumours in patients indicate that this compound is more concentrated in the tumour than in the blood (Table 1). This tumour uptake is higher in melanomas than in other tumours and therefore a given amount of Ro 03–8799 should produce a higher radiosensitization in melanomas than in other tumours. This radiosensitization should also be higher than with SR-2508 (taking into account corrections for electron affinity differences) which is less concentrated in tumours than Ro 03–8799 (Table 1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. G.E. Adaras, and D.L. Dewey, Hydrated electrons and radiobiological sensitization, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 12:473 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M.E. Watts and N.R. Jones, The effect of extracellular pH on radiosensitization by misonidazole and acidic or basic analogues, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 47:645 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. M.R.L. Stratford, M.F. Dennis, M.E. Watts, R.R. Watfa, and M. Woodcock, Radiosensitizer-DNA interactions in relation to intracellular uptake, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 16:1007 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. F. Laurent, P. Canal, and G. Soula, Pharmacokinetics of Ro 03–8799 in mice bearing melanosarcoma: Comparison with tumors without melanin, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 16:1101 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. S.A. Hill, J.F. Fowler, A.I. Minchinton, M.R.L. Stratford, and J. Denekamp, Radiosensitization of a mouse tumour by Ro 03–8799: acute and protracted administration, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 44:143 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. F. Lespinasse, Ch. Thomas, M. Bonnay, E.P. Malaise, and M. Guichard, Ro 03–8799: Preferential relative uptake in human tumor xenografts compared to a murine tumour? Comparison with SR-2508, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 16:1105 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. A.I. Minchinton, and M.R.L. Stratford, A comparison of tumor and normal tissue levels of acidic, basic and neutral 2-nitroimidazole radiosensitizers in mice, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 12:1117 (1986).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. M.I. Walton, N.M. Bleehen, and P. Workman, The effects of whole body hyperthermia on the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of the basic 2-nitroimidazole radiosensitizer Ro 03–8799 in mice, Br. J. Cancer. 55:469 (1987).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. M.V. Williams, J. Denekamp, A.I. Minchinton, and M.R.L. Stratford, In vivo testing of a 2-nitroimidazole radiosensitizer (Ro 03–8799) using repeated administration, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 8:477 (1982).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Dische, Radiotherapy using the hypoxic cell sensitizer Ro 03–8799 in malignant melanoma. Radiother. Oncol. 10:111 (1987).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Dische, M.H. Bennett, R. Orchard, M.R.L. Stratford, and P. Wardman, The uptake of the radiosensitizing compound Ro 03–8799 (Pimonidazole) in human tumours, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 16:1089 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Dische, M.I. Saunders, M.H. Bennett, E.P. Dunphy, C. Des Rochers, M.R.L. Stratford, A.I. Minchinton, and P. Wardman, A comparison of the tumour concentrations obtainable with misonidazole and Ro 03–8799. Br. J. Radiol. 59:911 (1986).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. H.F.V. Newman, N.M. Bleehen, and P. Workman, A phase I study of the combined hypoxic cell radiosensitizers, Ro 03–8799 and SR-2508: a preliminary report of a single-dose toxicity, pharmacokinetics and tumour concentrations, Br. J. Radiol. 59:423 (1986).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. H.F.V. Newman, R. Ward, P. Workman, and N.M. Bleehen, The multi-dose clinical tolerance and pharmacokinetics of the combined radiosensitizers, Ro 03–8799 (Pimonidazole) and SR-2508 (Etanidazole), Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 15:1073 (1988).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. M.I. Saunders, P.J. Anderson, N.H. Bennett, S. Dische, A. Minchinton, M.R.L. Stratford, and M. Tothill, The clinical testing of Ro 03–8799 — pharmacology, toxicity, tissue and tumour concentrations, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 10:1759 (1984).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. H.F.V. Newman, N.M. Bleehen, R. Ward, and P. Workman, Hypoxic cell radiosensitizers in the treatment of high grade gliomas: a new direction using combined Ro 03–8799 (Pimonidazole) and SR-2508 (Etanidazole), Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 15:677 (1988).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. J.T. Roberts, N.M. Bleehen, M.I. Walton, and P. Workman, A clinical phase I toxicity study of Ro 03–8799: plasma, urine, tumour and normal brain pharmacokinetics, Br. J. Radiol. 59:107 (1986).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. J.T. Roberts, N.M. Bleehen, P. Workman, and M.I. Walton, A phase I study of the hypoxic radiosensitizer Ro 03–8799, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 10:1755 (1984).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. R.A.S. White, P. Workman, and J.M. Brown, The pharmacokinetics and tumor and neural tissue penetrating properties of SR-2508 and SR-2555 in the dog -hydrophilic radiosensitizers potentially less toxic than misonidazole, Radiat. Res. 84:542 (1980).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. J.M. Brown and P. Workman, Partition coefficient as a guide to the development of radiosensitizers which are less toxic than misonidazole, Radiat. Res. 82:171 (1980).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. H.F.V. Newman, N.M. Bleehen, and P. Workman, A phase I study of the combination of two hypoxic cell radiosensitizers, Ro 03–8799 and SR-2508: toxicity and pharmacokinetics, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 12:1113 (1986).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. C.N. Coleman, R.C. Urtasun, T.H. Wasserman, S. Hancock, J.W. Harris, J. Halsey, and V.K. Hirst, Initial report of the phase I trial of the hypoxic cell radiosensitizer SR-2508, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 10:1749 (1984).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. H.K. Awwad, S. El Badawy, H.A. El Baki, M. Zaghloul, A.E.M. Osman, H. Akoush, and K. Fairchild, Pharmacokinetics of etanidazole (SR-2508) in bladder and cervical cancer: evidence of diffusion from urine, Int J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 16:1083 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Guichard, H. Dertinger, and E.P. Malaise, Radiosensitivity of four human tumor xenografts. Influence of hypoxia and cell-cell contact, Radiat. Res. 95:602 (1983).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Guichard and E.P. Malaise, Radiosensitizing effects of misonidazole and SR-2508 on a human melanoma transplanted in nude mice: influence on repair of potentially lethal damage, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 8:465 (1982).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. P.W. Vaupel, S. Frinak, and H.I. Bicher, Heterogeneous oxygen partial pressure and pH distribution in C3H mouse mammary adenocarcinoma, Cancer Res. 41:2008 (1981).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. I.S. Forrest, F. Gutmann, and H. Keyzer, In vitro interaction of chlorpromazine and melanin, Agressologie. 7:147 (1966).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guichard, M., Taghian, A., Lespinasse, F., Malaise, E.P. (1990). Does Ro 03–8799 Concentration in Human Tumour Xenografts Predict Radiosensitization? Comparison with SR-2508. In: Adams, G.E., Breccia, A., Fielden, E.M., Wardman, P. (eds) Selective Activation of Drugs by Redox Processes. NATO ASI Series, vol 198. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3768-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3768-7_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6679-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-3768-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics