Abstract
Configuration theory is, I believe, one of the most promising trends of modern organization theory. Here, effective organizations are conceived of as configurations or, to make the parallel with quantum physics, to be in certain “quantum states” composed of tightly interdependent and mutually supportive elements such as strategy, structure, culture, technology, and human skills. As a consequence, a change of configuration may often entail a more or less revolutionary “quantum jump” (Miller and Friesen, 1984). The theoretical underpinnings of what appears to be emerging as a theory of configuration, however, are not well-established and not yet very strong. It is the general aim of this paper to contribute to this theory formation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Broekstra, G., 1984, MAMA: Management by Matching, in: “Cybernetics and Systems Resarch,” R. Trappl, ed., Elsevier Science Publ., Holland.
Broekstra, G., 1991a, Consistency, configuration, closure, and change, in: “Steering, Autopoiesis, Configuration,” R.J. in’tVeld, ed., Kluwer Ac.Publ.
Broekstra, G., 1991b, Effective management = Hoiomanagement, Proc. 35th Annual Meeting ISSS, Ostersund, Sweden.
Dongen, J.H. van, 1991, “Organizing Realities: Rethinking Organizing and Social Integration,” to be publ.
Goguen, J.A., and Varela, F.J., 1979, Systems and distinctions; duality and complementarity, Int.J.General Systems, 5:31.
Maturana, H.R., and Varela, F.J., 1980, “Autopoiesis and cognition,” Reidel Publ.Comp., Holland.
Miles, R.E., and Snow, C.C., 1978, “Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process,” McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Tokyo.
Miller, D., 1981, Toward a new contingency approach: the search for organizational Gestalts, J.Management Studies, 18:1.
Miller, D., and Friesen, P.H., 1984, “Organizations: a Quantum View,” Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
Mingers, J., 1989, An introduction to autopoiesis-implications and applications, Systems Practice, 2:159.
Mintzberg, H., 1989, “Mintzberg on Management: Inside our Strange World of Organizations,” The Free Press, New York.
Morgan, G., 1986, “Images of Organization,” Sage Publ., London.
Quinn, R.E. and Rohrbaugh, J., 1983, A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing value approach to organizational analysis, Mngt.Science, 29:363.
Varela, F.J., 1978, On being autonomous: the lessons of natural history for systems theory, in: “Applied General Systems Research,” G.J. Klir, ed., Plenum Press, New York.
Varela, F.J., 1979, “Principles of Biological Autonomy,” North Holland, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Broekstra, G. (1991). Organizational Closure and the Quantum View of Organizations. In: Jackson, M.C., Mansell, G.J., Flood, R.L., Blackham, R.B., Probert, S.V.E. (eds) Systems Thinking in Europe. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3748-9_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3748-9_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6669-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-3748-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive