Abstract
The focusing of an ultrasonic wave on a fixed or moving target, in an inhomogeneous medium is usually degraded. Such a problem occurs in different medical applications, such as hyperthermia or lithotripsy. Even when the target to be insonified is localized with high precision (absolute position determined by X-ray imaging for instance), it is difficult to know which wavefront to transmit through the surrounding medium in order to obtain a good focusing. Ultrasonic imaging techniques also suffer from wavefront distortions through the abdominal layer. Dynamical focusing techniques suppose a constant sound velocity in the medium and neglect the wavefront distortions due to fat, muscles and collagen. The ultrasound velocity is usually taken equal to 1540 m/s, though it is 1410 m/s in fat and 1675 m/s in collagen. Previous publications [1][2] show that the detectability of low contrast tumors can be degraded by these distortions, and propose methods for distortion correction. The same kind of problems occurs in optics: wavefront distortions may be due to the aberrations of an optical system or to inhomogeneities of the refractive index in the transmitting medium (e.g. the atmosphere). Different methods allowing phase distortion compensation have been developed, among them the optical phase conjugation which has been studied since 1970 led to very impressive results. This technique applies to monochromatic fields and is performed with a phase conjugate mirror (PCM). An incident monochromatic wave distorted by an inhomogeneous medium impinges on the PCM, a new wave is generated by reversing the phase of the incident one on the mirror. The distortions of the wave are cancelled after the back propagation through the medium. Such phase conjugation can be physically realized in optics through non linear interactions that involve, for example, stimulated Brillouin scattering, three-wave mixing or the so-called degenerated four-wave mixing [3]. All these techniques require the incidence of several reference fields and only work with quasi-monochromatic waves as those produced by lasers. Methods of phase conjugation have also been developed in acoustics, but non linear effects in acoustics need high amplitude fields [4].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
O’Donnel and Flax. Phase aberration measurements in medical ultrasound human studies. Ultrason.lmag. 10 ppl-11 (1988).
L. Nock, G.E. Trahey and S.W. Smith. Phase aberration correction in medical ultrasound using speckle brightness as a quality factor. JASA 85(5) p1819 (1989).
D.M.Pepper. Non linear optical phase conjugation. Laser Handbook Vol 4, (North-Holland Physics Publishing, Amsterdam)
F.V. Bunkin, Yu.a. Kravtsov and G.A. Lyakhov. Acoustic analogues of nonlinear-optics phenomena. Sov.Phys.Ups. 29(7) p607 (1986).
G.S. Agarwal, A.T. Friberg and E. Wolf. Elimination of distortions by phase conjugation without losses or gains. Opt.Com. 43(6) p446. (1981)
M. Nieto-Vesperinas and E. Wolf. Phase conjugation and symmetries with wave fields in free space containing evanescent components. JOSA 2(9) p1429 (1985)
Bateman. Tables of integral transforms (Mc Craw-Hill 1954) Volume 2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fink, M., Prada, C., Wu, F. (1991). Self Focusing with “Time Reversal” Acoustic Mirrors. In: Lee, H., Wade, G. (eds) Acoustical Imaging. Acoustical Imaging, vol 18. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3692-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3692-5_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6641-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-3692-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive