Abstract
Diffraction tomography under the Born approximation was studied experimentally to help assess its potential utility for clinical imaging, particularly in the detection and classification of breast disease. The Born approximation is convenient to use since, being linear, it leads to simple and efficient inversion algorithms. However, its appropriateness for clinical imaging is questionable. In these experiments, particular care was taken to minimise errors of the data acquisition and image reconstruction processes in an effort to isolate the effects of the choice of the Born scattering model on the overall performance of diffraction tomography. Diffraction tomograms of a tissue mimicking breast phantom are compared with both X-ray and ultrasound computed tomograms The results indicate that, even under conditions when the assumptions of the Born approximation are violated, useful images can be obtained. Such images though not quantitatively accurate maps of the complex refractive index, allow identification of the major internal structures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
R. K. Mueller, M. Kaveh, and G Wade, Reconstructive tomography and applications to ultrasonics, Proc. IEEE 67:567 (1979).
M. Kaveh, R K. Mueller, R. Rylander, T. R Coulter, and M. Soumekh, Experimental results in ultrasonic diffraction tomography, in: “Acoustical Imaging”, K. Y. Wang, ed., Plenum, New York, 9:433 (1980).
R. K. Mueller, Diffraction tomography I: The wave equation, Ultrason. Imaging 2:213 (1980).
M. Kaveh, M. Soumekh, and R. K. Mueller, A comparison of Born and Rytov approximations in acoustic tomography, in: “Acoustical Imaging”, J. P. Powers, ed., Plenum, New York, 11:325 (1982).
A. P. Anderson and M. F. Adams, Synthetic aperture tomographic imaging for ultrasonic diagnostics, in: “Acoustical Imaging”, E. A. Ash and C. R Hill, eds., Plenum, New York, 12:565 (1982).
M. Kaveh, M. Soumekh, Z. Q. Lu, R. K. Mueller, and J. F. Greenleaf, Further results on diffraction tomography using Rytov’s approximation, in: “Acoustical Imaging” E. A. Ash and C. R Hill, eds., Plenum, New York, 12:599 (1982).
S. K. Kenue and J. F. Greenleaf, Limited angle multifrequency diffraction tomography, IEEE Trans. SU-29:213 (1982).
J. F. Greenleaf, Computerized tomography with ultrasound, PROC. IEEE 71:331 (1983).
A. C. Kak, Tomographic imaging with diffracting and non-diffracting sources, in: “Array Signal Processing”, S. Haykin, ed., Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 351, (1984)
B. S. Robinson and J. F. Greenleaf, Computerized ultrasound tomography, in: “Three- Dimensional Biomedical Imaging”, R A. Robb, ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2:76 (1985).
A. J. Devaney, Diffraction tomography, in: “Inverse Methods in Electromagnetic Imaging fl”, W. M. Boerner, ed., Reidel, Dordrecht, 2: 1107 (1985).
J. F. Greenleaf and A. Chu, Multifrequency diffraction tomography, in: “Acoustical Imaging”, M. Kaveh, R K. Mueller, and J. F. Greenleaf, eds.. Plenum, New York, 13:43 (1984).
B. Duchene, D. Lesselier, and W. Tabbara, Experimental investigation of a diffraction tomography technique in fluid ultrasonics, IEEE Trans. UFFC-35:437 (1988)
M Kaveh, M. Soumekh, and J. F. Greenleaf. Signal processing for diffraction tomography, IEEE Trans. SU-32:230 (1984).
S. A. Johnson, F. Stenger, C. Wilcox, J. Ball, and M. J. Berggren, Wave equations and inverse solutions for soft tissue, in: “Acoustical Imaging”, J. P. Powers, ed., Plenum, New York, 11:409 (1982).
B. S. Robinson and J. F. Greenleaf, Measurement and simulation of the scattering of ultrasound by penetrable cylinders, in: “Acoustical Imaging”, M. Kaveh, R. K. Mueller, and J. F. Greenleaf, eds., Plenum, New York, 13:163 (1984).
B. S. Robinson and J. F. Greenleaf, The scattering of ultrasound by cylinders: Implications for diffraction tomography, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80:40 (1986).
E. L. Madsen, J. A. Zagzebski, G. R. Frank, J. F. Greenleaf, and P. L. Carson, Anthropomorphic breast phantoms for assessing ultrasonic imaging system performance and for training ultrasonographers: Part II, J. Clin. Ultrasound 10:91 (1982).
M. Soumekh, M. Kaveh, and R. K. Mu eller, Fourier domain reconstruction methods with application to diffraction tomography, in: “Acoustical Imaging”, M. Kaveh, R. K. Mueller, and J. F. Greenleaf, eds., Plenum, New York, 13:17 (1984).
S. X. Pan, and A. C. Kak, A computational study of reconstruction algorithms for diffraction tomography: Interpolation versus filtered-backpropagation, IEEE Trans. ASSP-31:1262 (1983).
Z. Q. Lu, M. Kaveh, and R. K. Mueller, Diffraction tomography using beam waves: Z-average reconstruction, Ultrason. Imaging 6:95 (1984).
R H. T. Bates, Renaissance inversion, in: “Inverse Problems of Acoustic and Elastic Waves”, F. Santosa, ed., SIAM, Philadelphia, 350 (1984).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Robinson, B.S., Greenleaf, J.F. (1991). An Experimental Study of Diffraction Tomography under the Born Approximation. In: Lee, H., Wade, G. (eds) Acoustical Imaging. Acoustical Imaging, vol 18. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3692-5_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3692-5_41
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6641-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-3692-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive