Abstract
Several attempts have been made to describe and predict the dynamical behavior of the Earth’s magnetosphere as it is reflected in geomagnetic time series. Early results indicated that the dimension is low so that it might be possible to model the complex interactions giving rise to the irregular time series as a dynamical system with intrinsically unstable dynamics. However, it was recently pointed out that the low dimension may have been due to the long autocorrelation time scale of the system. A subsequent study of different time intervals and algorithmic and physical parameters gave further evidence that, indeed, the convergence of the correlation dimension was due to time correlations rather than global state space structure. Further examination of other diagnostics (exponents, forecasting) in this light shows that, although at first sight they pass several tests and conform to the interpretation of a low-dimensional chaotic system, several of their features are inconsistent with the assumptions of the analysis. The above difficulties inherent to analysis of a variety of real-world time series are pointed out and briefly discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
S.-I. Akasofu (ed.), Dynamics of the Magnetosphere, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland, 1980; A.T. Lui (ed.), Magnetotail Physics, The John’s Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1987
Y. Kamide and J. A. Slavin (eds.), Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Coupling, Terra Sci. Pub., Tokyo, 1986
P. Grassberger and I. Procaccia, Physica 9D, 189 (1983)
F. Takens, in: A. Dold and B. Eckmann (eds.), Dynamical Systems and Turbulence, Warwick 1980, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 898, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1981
A. M. Fraser, Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin, May 1988
N. Gershenfeld, this volume
The dimension was calculated to be v=3.6 by: D. Vassiliadis, A. S. Sharma, T. Eastman, and K. Papadopoulos, Geophys. Res. Lett. 17, 1841 (1990) for a variety of intervals of AE and AL with different activity levels; v =4 by: D. A. Roberts, J. Geoph. Res. 96, 16031 (1991) again for various intervals of AL; v =2.5 by L.-H. Shan, C. K. Goertz, and R. Smith, Geophys. Res. Lett. 18, 147 (1991) for a single interval; and 3<v<4 by G. Pavlos, private communication. All these low-dimensional results are due to high autocorrelations as indicated by the Theiler test.
J. TheĂ¼er, Phys. Lett. A 155, 480 (1991)
D. Prichard and C. Price, preprint (submitted to Geophys. Res. Lett.)
J. Theiler, Phys. Rev. A 34, 2427 (1986)
A. R. Osborne and A. Provenzale, Physica D35, 357 (1989)
H. Abarbanel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1523 (1991); X. Zeng, R. Eykholt, and R. A. Pielke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 3229 (1991); G. Mayer-Kress (Ed.), Dimensions and entropies in chaotic systems, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1986.
A. Wolf J. B. Swift, H. L. Swinney, and J. A. Vastano, Physica 16D, 285 (1985)
D. Vassiliadis, S. Sharma, and K. Papadopoulos, Geophys. Res. Lett. 18, 1643 (1991)
J. D. Farmer and J. J. Sidorowitch, in: Y. C. Lee (ed.), Evolution, Ecology and Cognition, World Sci., Singapore, 1989; also references in that article
D. S. Broomhead, R. Jones, and G. P. King, J. Phys. A 20, L563 (1987)
M. Casdagli,to appear in: Nonlinear Prediction and Modeling, Addison-Wesley, 1991
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vassiliadis, D., Sharma, A.S., Papadopoulos, K. (1992). Time Series Analysis of Magnetospheric Activity Using Nonlinear Dynamical Methods. In: Bountis, T. (eds) Chaotic Dynamics. NATO ASI Series, vol 298. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3464-8_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3464-8_31
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6534-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-3464-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive