Abstract
Even when individuals are matched for age and ocular health, their contrast sensitivity functions (CSFs) will differ. Some of these differences seem to be caused by individual differences in underlying spatial mechanisms that detect narrow ranges of spatial frequency. This is because an individual’s performance at a particular frequency (i.e., one’s sensitivity to a test frequency relative to the group mean at that frequency) tends to predict performance at nearby frequencies only. Attempts to use individual differences in CSFs to test quantitative models of spatial mechanisms are reviewed. Preliminary analyses indicate that mechanisms tuned to low spatial frequencies at birth may shift to higher frequencies during development.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Banks, M. S. & Ginsburg, A. P., 1985, Infant visual preferences: a review and new theoretical treatment,Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 19: 207.
Billock, V. A. & Harding, T. H., 1991, The number and tuning of channels responsible for the independent detection of temporal modulation, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. Suppl., 32: 840.
Fiorentini, A., Pirchio, M. & Spinelli, D., 1983, Electrophysiological evidence for frequency selective mechanisms in adults and infants, Vis. Res., 23: 119.
Greenlee, M. W., Magnussen, S. & Nordby, K., 1988, Spatial vision of the achromat: spatial frequency and orientation-specific adaptation, J. Physiol., 395: 661.
Graham, N., 1989, Visual Pattern Analyzers., Oxford University Press, New York.
Movshon, J. A. & Kiorpes, L., 1988, Analysis of spatial contrast sensitivity in monkey and human infants, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 5: 2166.
Owsley, C., Sekuler, R. & Siemsen, D., 1983, Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood, Vis. Res., 23: 689.
Peterzell, D. H., Werner, J. S. & Kaplan, P. S., 1991a, Sources of individual differences in the contrast sensitivity functions of human infants, Submitted for publication.
Peterzell, D. H., Werner, J. S. & Kaplan, P. S., 1991b, Sources of individual differences in CSF development, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. Suppl., 32: 963.
Sekuler, R., Wilson, H. R. & Owsley, C., 1984, Structural modeling of spatial vision, Vis Res. 24: 689.
Selwyn, E. W. H., 1948, The photographic and visual resolving power of lenses, Part I. Visual resolving power, The Photographic Journal B, 88B: 6.
Tolhurst, D., 1973, Separate channels for the analysis of the shape and movement of a moving visual stimulus, J. Physiol., 231: 385.
Van Sluyters, R. C., Atkinson, J., Banks, M.S., Held, R.M., Hoffmann, K.-P., & Shatz, C.J., 1990, The development of vision and visual perception, in L. Spillmann & J. S. Werner, Eds., Visual Perception: The Neurophysiological Foundations, Academic Press, San Diego.
Wilson, H. R., 1988, Development of spatiotemporal mechanisms in infant vision, Vis. Res., 28: 611.
Wilson, H. R. & Bergen, J. R., 1979, A four mechanism model for spatial vision, Vis Res., 19: 19.
Yuodelis, C. & Hendrickson, A. E., 1986, A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the human fovea during development, Vis. Res., 26: 847.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Peterzell, D., Werner, J.S., Kaplan, P.S. (1991). Individual Differences in Contrast Sensitivity Functions of Human Adults and Infants: A Brief Review. In: Bagnoli, P., Hodos, W. (eds) The Changing Visual System. NATO ASI Series, vol 222. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3390-0_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3390-0_34
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6497-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-3390-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive