Skip to main content

Franchise Bidding, Contracting Out, and Worksharing in the Production of Postal Services: Can They Collect, Sort, and Deliver?

  • Chapter
Regulation and the Nature of Postal and Delivery Services

Part of the book series: Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series ((TREP,volume 12))

  • 58 Accesses

Abstract

The Private Express Statutes, enacted in 1845, guarantee’ the United States Postal Service (USPS) sole rights to carry letter mail. The principal argument offered in defense of the statutes is that the supply of postal services constitutes a natural monopoly (cf., Priest (1975); and U.S. President’s Commission on Privatization (1988)) and that efficiency is best promoted by having a single firm serve the entire market. According to the argument, more than one supplier in the market leads to higher than necessary production costs and, on account of the raised costs, higher than necessary prices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adie, Douglas K. 1977.An Evaluation of Postal Service Wage Rates.Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adie, Douglas K. 1989.Monopoly Mail.New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, Armen, and Harold Demsetz. 1972. “Production, Information Costs and Economic Organization.” AmericanEconomic Review62 (December): 777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher, Martin, and Joel Popkin. 1984. “The Effect of Gender and Race Differentials on Public-Private Wage Comparisons: A Study of Postal Workers.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review38 (No. 1, October).

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Stuart M. 1985.The Privatization Option.Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation. Christensen Associates, Inc. 1985.Econometric Analysis of USPS Structure of Production and Total Factor Productivity 1963–83.Madison, WI: C.A. Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew M.A. and P.A. Kleindorfer. 1986. The Economics of Public Utility Regulation. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew, Michael A., and Mark A. Zupan. 1991. “Franchise Bidding for Public Utilities Revisited.” InCompetition and the Regulation of Utilitiesedited by Michael A. Crew. Norwell, Ma: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crutcher, John. 1983. Remarks at Spring Seminar, Program on Information Resources and Society, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutcher, John. 1988. “Testimony Before the President’s Commission on Privatization.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutcher, John W., and Leonard Merewitz. 1989. “A Survey to Compare Compensation for Mail Services in State Government with USPS Wages.” Washington, DC: U.S. Postal Rate Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, Harold E. 1968. “Why Regulate Public Utilities?”Journalof Law and Economics 11(No. 1, April): 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, Victor P. 1976. “Regulation and Administered Contracts.”Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science7 (No. 2, Autumn): 426–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldi, John. 1974.Postal Monopoly.Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, Paul L. 1974. “Inflation and Environmental Concern: Structural Change in the Process of Public Utility Regulation.”Journal of Law and Economics17 (No. 2, October): 291–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Benjamin, Robert Crawford, and Armen Alchian. 1978. “Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process.”Journal of Law and Economics21 (No. 3, October): 297–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Benjamin, and Keith Leffler. 1981. “The Role of Market Forces in Assuring ContractualPerformance.”Journal ofPolitical Economy89 (No. 4, December): 615–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lander, D.H. 1989. “Bringing Postal Services into the Information Age: A Canadian Viewpoint.” Remarks to the Brookings Postal Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merewitz, Leonard 1971. “Costs and Returns to Scale in U.S. Post Offices.”Journal of the American Statistical AssociationLXVI (September): 335.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Star Route Mail Carriers Association. 1986. “The History of Star Routes in the U.S.” Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panzar, John C. 1991. “Is Postal Service a Natural Monopoly?.” InCompetition and Innovation in Postal Servicesedited by Michael A. Crew and Paul R. Kleindorfer. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, Alan T., and Charles K. Rowley. 1972. “Welfare Economics and the Public

    Google Scholar 

  • Regulation of Natural Monopoly. “JournalofPublicEconomics5(No. 2, June): 227–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perloff, Jeffrey M., and Michael L. Wachter. 1984. “Wage Comparability in the USPS.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review38 (October): 26–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, Richard A. 1972. “The Appropriate Scope of Regulation in the Cable Television Industry.”Bell Journal of Economics3 (No. 1, Spring): 211–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prager, Robin A. 1986. “Finn Behavior in Franchise Monopoly Markets: The Case of Cable Television in Massachusetts.” Doctoral dissertation, Department of Economics, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest, George L. 1975. “The History of the Postal Monopoly in the UnitedStates.”Journal of Law and Economics18 (No. 1, April): 33–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Joseph F. 1979. “Postal Sector Wages.”Industrial Relations18 (Winter): 92–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson, Cathy M., and William Takis. 1992. “Economies of Scale and Scope and Competition in Postal Services.” (This volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Sharon P. 1976. “Are Postal Workers Over-or Underpaid?”IndustrialRelations.15 (No. 2, May): 168–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seagraves, Van H. 1986. “Voss Opens a Can of Worms.”Business Mailers Review7 (No. 11, June 9): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, Rodney E. 1973. “Postal Pricing Problems and Production Functions.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiemey, John. 1981.Postal Reorganization Managing the Public’s Business. Boston: Auburn House.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Code, Title 39, Postal Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office. 1975. “$100 Million Could be Saved Annually in Postal Operations in Rural America Without Affecting the Quality of Service.” Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office. 1982. “The Postal Service can Substantially Reduce its Cleaning Costs.” Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Postal Inspection Service. 1988. “Delivery Costs.” Washington, DC: U.S. Postal Inspection Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Postal Rate Commission. 1990.Study of US Postal Service Productivity and its Measurement.Staff Study.

    Google Scholar 

  • USPS. 1991a.Comprehensive Statement on Postal Operations FY 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • USPS. 199 lb. “Response of USPS to Presiding Officer’s Information Request No. 1 on Resubmission.”Postal Rate and Fee Changes.PRC Docket R90–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • USPS. 1991c.Revenue Pieces,Weight ReportFY 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • USPS. 1992a.Annual Report FY 1991.Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • USPS. 1992b.Comprehensive Statement on Postal Operations.1991, FY.

    Google Scholar 

  • USPS. 1992e.Domestic Mail Manual.Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. President, Commission on Privatization. 1988.Privatization: Toward More Effective Government.Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver. 1976. “Franchise Bidding for Natural Monopolies—in General and with Respect to CATV.”Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 7(No. 1, Spring): 73–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver. 1983. “Credible Commitments: Using Hostages to Support Exchange.”American Economic Review 75(September): 519–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zupan, Mark A. 1989a. “Nonprice Concessions and the Effect of Franchise Bidding Schemes on Cable Company Costs.”Applied Economics21 (No. 3, March): 305–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zupan, Mark A. 1989b. “A Test for Regulatory Lag and the Role Played by Periodic Contract Renewals in Mitigating Such Lag in Local Cable Franchise Relationships.”Journal of Regulatory Economics1 (No. 1, March): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zupan, Mark A. 1989c. “The Efficacy of Franchise Bidding Schemes in the Case of CATV: Some Systematic Evidence.”Journalof Law and Economics32 (No. 2, part 1, October): 401–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Merewitz, L., Zupan, M.A., Castro, M.C. (1993). Franchise Bidding, Contracting Out, and Worksharing in the Production of Postal Services: Can They Collect, Sort, and Deliver?. In: Crew, M.A., Kleindorfer, P.R. (eds) Regulation and the Nature of Postal and Delivery Services. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series, vol 12. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3120-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3120-3_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6365-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-3120-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics