Skip to main content

Evaluation of CBT Authoring Systems: Need a Data Base

  • Chapter
Advanced Technologies Applied to Training Design

Part of the book series: Defense Research Series ((DRSS,volume 4))

  • 71 Accesses

Abstract

A computer-based training (CBT) authoring system is a special kind of software tool-kit for training developers with no programming skills and limited instructional design experience to use in developing CBT materials (i.e.,courseware). Many authoring systems have taken into account the needs of computer-naive users so that the learning requirements for using the systems is supposed to be minimal. However, the selection of the best authoring system for a given purpose requires a systematic evaluation because many systems have been developed to serve basically the same purpose with different procedural approaches, functional features and power. The purposes of this paper are: (a) to discuss evaluation methods for selecting an authoring system; (b) to examine important evaluation criteria; (c) to propose a set of evaluation procedures; (d) to discuss the need for developing a CBT authoring tool data base and provide initial inputs for the development of the data base.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ADCIS. A special issue on authoring systems. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 11, 67–102, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avner, A., Smith, S., & Tenzer, P. CBI authoring tools: Effects on productivity and quality. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction. 11, 85–89, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, C. Authoring systems for CBT - Part 1. Training Technology, 12–16, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, C. Authoring systems for CBT - Part 2. Training Technology, 16–20, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, C. Authoring systems for CBT - Part 3. Training Technology, 11–14, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham, M., Murphy, P., Cresci, K., Klevenow, S., Sims-Tucker, B., Slade, D., & Wizer, D. A evaluation of computer courseware authoring tools and a corresponding assessment instrument for use by instructors. Educational Technology, 26, 7–18, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillelsohn, M. J. Benchmarking authoring systems. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 11, 95–97, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Instructional Delivery Systems. Directory of Authoring Systems. Instructional Delivery Systems, 5, 16–23, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locatis, C., Ullmer, E., Car, V., Banvard, R., Le, Q., & Williamson, M. AuthorBase: A database of authoring systems software. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, Los Alamitos, California: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locatis, C., & Can, V. Selecting authoring systems. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 12, 28–31, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macknight, C. B., & Balagopalan, S. Authoring systems: Some instructional implications. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 17, 123–134, 1988–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, O., & Seidel, J. R. Evaluation criteria for selecting a CÐ’I authoring system. T.H.E. Journal, 7, 61–68, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, O. Instructional Strategies: A Taxonomy. Minneapolis, MN.: Control Data Corporation, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raybold, B. Choosing the right hypertext product for performance supports, CBT Directions, 3, 13–20. Boston, M.A.: Weingarten Publications, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • T.H.E. Journal. Directory of authoring software. T.H.E. Journal, 15, 19–24, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • T.H.E. Journal. Authoring Packages Continued to Mature. T.H.E. Journal, 17, 10–18, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingarten Publications. CBT Guide: A directory of authoring systems and courseware compiled by the editors of CBT Directions. Boston, M.A.: Weingarten Publications, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. L. The case for using authoring systems to develop courseware. Educational Technology, 24, 26–28, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Seidel, R.J., Park, OC. (1993). Evaluation of CBT Authoring Systems: Need a Data Base. In: Seidel, R.J., Chatelier, P.R. (eds) Advanced Technologies Applied to Training Design. Defense Research Series, vol 4. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3014-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3014-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6313-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-3014-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics