Overview
Woodward and Devonis propose a program for analyzing the history of psychology based on the notion of interfield theory. Both of us have long been interested in relations between fields or disciplines of science, and one of us (WB) has analyzed a number of examples of interfield theories. The notion of an interfield theory was developed for quite specific purposes, however, and it is not clear that it can bear the load Woodward and Devonis seek to place upon it. We will first indicate some of the challenges that will confront any attempt to apply the notion of interfield theory to analyzing the development of psychology as a discipline and then offer an alternative perspective on psychology as a discipline, from which we might then apply the notion of interfield theory fruitfully in a more restricted way. In addition to advancing a framework for analyzing the development of psychology, Woodward and Devonis also advance interpretations of specific aspects of psychology’s history. Some of these interpretations are open to challenge or alternative formulations; however, we have chosen to restrict our focus to questions raised by their application of interfield theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abrahamsen, A.A. (1987). Bridging boundaries versus breaking boundaries: Psycholinguistics in perspective. Synthese, 72 ,355–388.
Abrahamsen, A.A. (1991). Bridging interdisciplinary boundaries: The case of kin terms. In C. Georgopoulos &R. Ishihara (Eds.), Interdisciplinary approaches to language: Essays in honor of S.-Y. Kuroda (pp. 1–24). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Bechtel, W. (1988). Philosophy of science: An ovennew for cognitive science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bechtel, W. (1989). An evolutionary perspective on the re-emergence of cell biology. In K. Halweg &C. Hooker (Eds.), Issues in evolutionary epistemol ogy (pp. 433–457). Albany: SUNY University Press.
Bechtel, W. (In press). Integrating science by creating new disciplines: The case of cell biology. Biology and Philosophy
Bechtel, W., &Richardson, R.C. (In press). Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. Biology and Philosphy
Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and mind (enlarged edition). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Churchland, P.M. (1981). Eliminative materialism and propositional attitudes.The Journal of Philosophy 78 ,67–90.
Churchland, P.S. (1986). Neurophilosophy: Toward a unified science of the mind brain. Cambridge: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
Darden, L. (1986). Relations amongst fields in the evolutionary synthesis. In W. Bechtel (Ed.), Integrating scientific disciplines (pp. 113–123). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
Darden, L. (1991). Strategies for theory change.: The case of the theory of the gene. London: Oxford University Press.
Darden, L., &Maull, N. (1977). Interfield theories. Philosophy of Science, 43 ,44–64.
Fodor, J.A. (1974). Special sciences (Or: Disunity of science as a working hypothesis). Synthese, 28 ,97–115.
Giere, R.N. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hull, D.L. (1988). Science as a process. An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McCauley, R.N. (1986). Intertheoretic relations and the future of psychology. Philosophy of Science, 53 ,179–199.
McCauley, R.N. (1987). The not so happy story of the marriage of linguistics and psychology or why linguistics has discouraged psychology’s recent advances. Synthese ,72,341–353.
Mullin, N. C. (1972). The development of a scientific speciality: the phage group and the origins of molecular biology. Minerva, 10 ,51–82.
Nickles, T. (1980). Introductory essay: Scientific discovery and the future of philosophy of science. In T. Nickles, (Ed.), Scientific discovery: Logic and rationality (pp. 1–59). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Reber, A. (1987). The rise and (surprisingly rapid) fall of psycholinguistics. Synthese, 72 ,325–339.
Staats, A.W. (1983). Psychology’s crisis of disunity: Philosophy and method for a unified science. New York: Praeger
Staats, A.W. (1989). Unification: Philosophy for the modern disunified science of psychology. Philosophical Psychology, 2 ,143–164.
Thagard, P. (1988). Computational philosophy of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bechtel, W., Abrahamsen, A.A. (1993). Interfield Connections and Psychology. In: Rappard, H.V., Van Strien, P.J., Mos, L.P., Baker, W.J. (eds) Annals of Theoretical Psychology. Annals of Theoretical Psychology, vol 9. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2986-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2986-6_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6300-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2986-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive