Abstract
In recent years, interest in the history of psychology seems to have grown exponentially, which may or may not be a ‘good thing’. At least, judged by the number of new titles, including texts, monographs, and essay collections on historical topics, publishers apparently expect the field to provide them with a sizeable market even if not turning into ‘big business’. Although the upcoming centennial of the founding of the American Psychological Association and allied ceremonial events may account for part of this expansion, several other developments have contributed to it. To name two among them, there was first the post-Kuhnian redefinition of the task set for a disciplinary history. Secondly, psychologist-historians discovered a new cache of data in the form of unpublished archival source material — although even today the official APA publication manual still does not allow, in its meticulous prescriptions for proper references, for the legitimate existence of such unpublished material, thus providing us with a contemporary example of what Danziger discusses as the object-constituting activities deriving from supposedly neutral but in fact quite imperialistic methodologies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Buss, A.R. (Ed.) (1979). Psychology in social context. New York: Irvington.
Cronbach, L.J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671--684.
Danziger, K. (1979). The social origins of modem psychology. In A.R. Buss (Ed.), Psychology in social context (pp. 27–45). New York: Irvington.
Danziger, K. (June 1981). An approach to a critical history of psychology. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Cheiron Society, University of Wisconsin, River Falls, WI.
Danziger, K. (1987). Social context and investigative practice in early twentieth-century psychology. In M.G. Ash & W.R. Woodward (Eds.), Psychology in twentieth-century thought and society (pp. 13–33). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leary, D.E. (1987). Telling likely stories. Journal ofthe History ofthe Behavioral Sciences, 23,315–331.
Samelson, F. (1979). Putting psychology on the map. In A. R. Buss (Ed.), Psychology in social context (pp. 103–168). New York: Irvington.
Samelson, F. (1980). J.B. Watson’s Little Albert, Cyril Burt’s Twins, and the need for critical science. American Psychologist, 35, 619–625.
Samelson, F. (August 1988). J.B. Watson in 1913: Rhetoric and practice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association,Atlanta, GA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Samelson, F. (1993). History from the Top Down. In: Rappard, H.V., Van Strien, P.J., Mos, L.P., Baker, W.J. (eds) Annals of Theoretical Psychology. Annals of Theoretical Psychology, vol 8. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2982-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2982-8_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6298-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2982-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive