Skip to main content

Methods for evaluating confounding and effect modification in a small occupational study of cutaneous malignant melanoma

  • Chapter
  • 56 Accesses

Part of the book series: Developments in Oncology ((DION,volume 73))

Abstract

In their review of occupational risk factors for cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM), Austin and Reynolds note that studies of the occupational etiology of CMM have been “plagued by the problem of small numbers” [1]. For example, occupational clusters identified in any one work place are usually too small to adjust for nonoccupational confounding or to examine for the modifying effects of time-related variables. Therefore, such occupational clusters cannot be definitively attributed either to occupational risks or to unequal distribution of nonoccupational factors between cases and controls. Further, small samples limit the ability to determine whether potential exposure variables show different relationships to case status during different time periods. Such time-varying relationships may help identify etiologic agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austin DF, Reynolds P: Occupation and malignant melanoma of the skin. In Gallagher RP (ed.), Epidemiology of Malignant Melanoma, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag:1986, 98–108.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Austin DF, Reynolds PJ: A case-control study of malignant melanoma among Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory employees. Report No. 3, Malignant Melanoma. Livermore, Calif: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rhodes AR, Weinstock MA, Fitzpatrick TB, Mihm JC Jr., Sober AJ: Risk factors for cutaneous melanoma. JAMA 1987;258:3146–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Graham S, Marshall J, Haughey B, et al.: An inquiry into the epidemiology of melanoma. Am J Epidemiol 1985;122:606–619.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Holman CD, Armstrong BK, Heenan PJ: The causes of malignant melanoma: results from West Australian Lion’s Melanoma Research Project. In Epidemiology of Malignant Melanoma. Gallagher, RP (ed.) Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg. 1986, 18–38.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Pickle LW, Mason TJ, Howard N, Hoover R, Fraumeni JF: Atlas of U.S. Cancer mortality among whites: 1950–1980, DHEW publications (NIH) 1987;87–2900.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Williams RR: Breast and thyroid cancer and malignant melanoma promoted by alcohol-induced pituitary secretion of prolactin TSH and MSH. Lancet 1976;i:996–999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berel V, Evans S, Shaw H, et al: Cutaneous factors related to the risk of malignant melanoma. Br J Dermatol 1983;109:165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Holman CD, Armstrong BK.: Pigmentary traits, ethnic origin, benign nevi, and familial history as risk factors for cutaneous malignant melanoma. JNCI 1984;72:257–266.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Green A, MacLennon R, Siskind V: Common acquired nevi and the risk of malignant melanoma. Int J Cancer 1985;35:297–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Venzon DJ, Moolgavkar SH: Cohort analysis of malignant melanoma in five countries, Am J Epidemiol, 1984:119(l):62–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Desouza CM: An empirical Bayes formulation of cohort models in cancer epidemiology. Statistics in Medicine 1991;10:1241–1256.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Royal RM.: The effect of sample size on the meaning of significance. Amer Stat 1986;40:313–315.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Robins JM, Greenland S.: The role of model selection in casual inference from nonexperimental data. Am J Epid 1986;123:392–402.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Greenland S, Robins J.: Empirical-Bayes adjustments for multiple comparisons are sometimes useful. Epidemiology 1991;2:244–251.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schwartzbaum, J.A., Setzer, R.W., Kupper, L.L. (1994). Methods for evaluating confounding and effect modification in a small occupational study of cutaneous malignant melanoma. In: Gallagher, R.P., Elwood, J.M. (eds) Epidemiological Aspects of Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma. Developments in Oncology, vol 73. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2626-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2626-1_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6126-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2626-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics