C-Terminus on Acitn: Spectroscopic and Immunochemical Examination of its Role in Actomyosin Interactions
The understanding of force generation during cyclic interactions of myosin with actin requires a detailed description of actomyosin interface and its evolution during ATP hydrolysis. Until now, driven by the availability of mutants1–4 and atomic resolution structure of actin5, the mapping of actomyosin interface has focused on the determination of myosin binding sites on actin. Two proximal areas on actin, in the N- and C-terminal regions of this protein, have been implicated by structural considerations5,6 and biochemical7,8, immunochemical, NMR, and mutagenic studies1–3,15 in the binding of myosin heads (S-1). Immunochemical10and mutagenic approaches16 suggested also the involvement of residues 91–103 on actin in actomyosin interactions. While the previous studies produced a general agreement on the important contribution of N-terminal acidic residues 1–4 on actin to the activation of the myosin ATPase activity and the motility of actin filaments, the actual role of actin’s C-terminal residues in actomyosin interactions has not been assessed. An interesting approach to this task, which was employed also in the work on LC-2 myosin light chains17, was taken by Labbe et al.10 These authors modified the penultimate cysteine residue on actin, Cys-374, with N-iodoacetyl-N’-(5-sulpho-1-naphtyl)ethylenediamine (1,5- IAEDANS) and showed in solid phase immunochemical assays (ELISA) that S-1 and antidansyl antibodies competed with each other for the binding to the modified cysteine.
KeywordsATPase Activity Myosin Head Myosin ATPase Activity Actin Concentration Myosin Subfragment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.P. Aspenstrom, and R. Karlsson, Interference with myosin subfragment-1 binding by site-directed mutagenesis of actin, Eur. J. Biochem., 200: 35 (1992).Google Scholar
- 9.C. Mejean, M. Boyer, J.P. Labbe, J. Derancourt, Y. Benyamin, and C. Roustan, Anti-actin antibodies: an immunological approach to the myosin-actin and tropomyosin-actin interfaces, Biochem. J., 244: 571 (1987).Google Scholar
- 10.J.P. Labbe, C. Mejean, Y. Benyamin, and C. Roustan, Characterization of an actin-myosin head interface in the 40-113 region of actin using specific antibodies as probes Biochem. J., 271: 407 (1990).Google Scholar
- 14.A.J.G. Moir, and B. A. Levine, Protein cognitive sites on the surface of actin. A proton NMR study, J. Inorganic Chem., 27: 271 (1986).Google Scholar
- 15.R.K. Cook, D. Root, C. Miller, E. Reisler, and P.A. Rubenstein, Enhanced stimulation of myosin subfragment 1 ATPase activity by addition of negatively charged residues to the yeast actin NH2 terminus, J. Biol. Chem., 268: 2410 (1993).Google Scholar
- 19.P. Graceffa, and A. Jancso, Disulfide cross-linking of caldesmon to actin, J. Biol. Chem., 266: 20305 (1991).Google Scholar
- 21.C. Combeau, D. Didry, and M.-F. Carlier, Interaction between G-actin and myosin subfragment-1 probed by covalent cross-linking, J. Biol. Chem., 267: 14038 (1992).Google Scholar
- 26.J.A. Spudich, and S. Watt, Regulation of skeletal muscle contraction. I. Biochemical studies of the interaction of the tropomyosin-troponin complex with actin and the proteolytic fragments of myosin, J. Biol. Chem., 246: 4866 (1971).Google Scholar
- 31.L. Miller, M. Phillips, and E. Reisler, Polymerization of G-actin by myosin subfragment 1, J. Biol. Chem., 263: 1996 (1988).Google Scholar
- 36.T. Kouyama, and K. Mihashi, Fluorimetry study of N-(1-pyrenyl)iodoacetamide-labeled F-actin, Eur. J. Biochem. 114: 33 (1981).Google Scholar
- 37.M. Mossakowska, J. Moraczewska, S. Khaitlina, H. Strzelecka-Golaszewska, Proteolytic removal of three C-terminal residues of actin alters the monomer-monomer interactions, Biochem. J. 289: 897 (1992).Google Scholar