What is and What is not Essential in Lorentz’s Relativity
The special theory of relativity has already existed for nearly a century, and the controversy between the adherents of its two versions is almost as old. While Einstein’s version is widely accepted by the scientific community, its Lorentz’s alternative is even far from being widely known. Worse still, its partisans are often accused of lack of competence. Of course, this strange state of affairs may be partly explained by various “external factors” - psychological, sociological, historical and the like. It is, however, more interesting to ask about possible “internal factors”. Maybe, the followers of Lorentz’s relativity are guilty to some extent.
KeywordsRest Frame Inertial Frame Lorentz Transformation Time Dilation Light Velocity
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.M. Friedmann, Relativity principles, absolute objects and symmetry groups, in:“Space, Time and Geometry,” P. Suppes, ed., Reidel, Dordrecht (1973).Google Scholar
- 5.S. Weinberg, The cosmological principle, in: “Gravitation and Cosmology,” Wiley, New York (1972).Google Scholar
- 6.W.L. Craig, The elimination ofNewton’s absolute time by relativity theory, in: “Physical Interpretations of Relativity Theory,” British Society for the Philosophy of Science, London (1990).Google Scholar
- 15.A. Eddington, The velocityof light, in: “The Mathematical Theory of Relativity,” Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1960).Google Scholar
- 16.M. Born, Schein und Wirklichkeit, in: “Die Relativitätstheorie Einsteins,” Springer, Berlin, (1920).Google Scholar
- 17.J.L. Synge, Apparent contraction of a moving body and apparent retardation of a moving clock, in: “Relativity: The Special Theory,” Amsterdam (1965).Google Scholar
- 18.H.A. Lorentz, The principle of relativity for uniform translations, in: “Lectures on Theoretical Physics” Vol. 3, MacMillan, London (1931).Google Scholar
- 20.C. Møller, Contraction of bodies in motion. The retardation ofmoving clocks. The clock paradox, in: “The Theory of Relativity,” Clarendon Press, Oxford (1952).Google Scholar
- 22.J.S. Bell, How to teach special relativity, in: “Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics,” Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1987).Google Scholar
- 23.C. Møller, The Doppler effect, the aberration of light, and the dragging phenomenon according to the theory of relativity, in: “The Theory of Relativity,” Clarendon Press, Oxford (1952).Google Scholar