Advertisement

Restoring Locality with Faster-Than-Light Velocities

  • Philippe H. Eberhard

Abstract

The idea of “locality” is a deep-rooted concept. It does not have to be abandoned even if “loophole-free” EPR experiments are performed and confirm the predictions of quantum theory. To satisfy locality, one can imagine that influences at a distance are exerted via mechanisms involving an ether and effects propagating in that ether at a velocity V > c. Such model of physical phenomena is not Lorentz invariant but, with V large enough, the model can be made to reproduce the results of all experiments where quantum mechanics and Lorentz invariance have been verified.

Key words

locality superluminal quantum-model ether EPR 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    N. D. Mermin, “The EPR experiment-Thoughts about the ‘loophole,’” New Techniques and Ideas in Quantum Measurement Theory ,D. M. Greenberger, ed. (New York Academy of Science, New York, 1986), pp. 422–428.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. Newton in a letter to R. Bentley, 1692/3, quoted in Theories of the Universe ,M. K. Munitz, ed. (Free Press, New York, 1957), p. 217.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47 (1935) 777.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. S. Bell, Physics 1 (1964) 195Google Scholar
  5. 4a.
    J. F. Clauser, M. A. Home, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1969) 880.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 4b.
    H. P. Stapp, Phys. Rev. D 3 (1971) 1303.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 4c.
    J. F. Clauser and M. A. Horne, Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974) 526.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 4d.
    J. S. Bell, CERN preprint Th 2053, reproduced in Epistem. Lett. (Assoc. F. Gonseth, CP 1081, CH-205 Bienne) 9 (1975) 11.Google Scholar
  9. 5.
    S. J. Freedman and J. F. Clauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28 (1972) 938.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 5a.
    J. F. Clauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 (1976) 1223.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 5b.
    E. S. Fry and R. C. Thompson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 (1976) 465.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 5c.
    A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47 (1981) 460.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 5d.
    A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, ibid. 49 (1982) 91.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 5e.
    A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 1804.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 6.
    P. H. Eberhard, in Quantum Theory and Pictures of Reality ,W. Schommers, ed. (Springer, Heidelberg, 1989), p. 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 7.
    J. von Neuman, Mathematical Foundations of the Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1955).Google Scholar
  17. 8.
    G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, and T. Weber, Phys. Rev. D 34 (1986) 470.MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 8a.
    G. C. Ghirardi, P. Pearle, and A. Rimini, Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 78.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philippe H. Eberhard
    • 1
  1. 1.Lawrence Berkeley LaboratoryUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations