Frameless Stereotaxy

Technical Aspects
  • T. M. Peters
  • A. C. Evans
  • A. Olivier
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 264)

Abstract

Until recently, stereotactic surgery has required that a stereotactic frame be fixed to the head of the patient during both imaging and surgery (Peters et al, 1989). However, with the stereotactic frame fixed to the patient in this manner, access to the surgical site is limited by the geometry of the frame, and some approaches are not possible. Removal of the frame from the operating room gives the operator complete freedom in the planning of the procedure. In addition, procedures that previously were performed using conventional techniques may take advantage of image guidance techniques developed for stereotaxy. The advent of sophisticated computer techniques has hastened the development of image-guided approaches to complement the surgical procedure (Kelly and Kail, 1992).

Keywords

Kelly Kato 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barham, P. T., and McAllister, D. F., 1991, A comparison of stereoscopic cursors for the interactive manipulation of b-splines, in: “Symposium on electronic imaging and technology, SPIE/IS&T,” 96.Google Scholar
  2. Cavanah, P., 1987, Reconstructing the third dimension: interaction between colour, texture, motion, binocular disparity and shape, Comp Vision, Graphics, Image Proc. 37: 171–195.Google Scholar
  3. Fuchs, H., 1990, Systems for display of three-dimensional medical data, in: “Three-dimensional Imaging in Medicine. Algorithms, Systems and Applications,” K. H. Hoehner, H. Fuchs, S. Pizer, eds. Nato ASI series F Computers and System Sciences, Vol. 60. pp 315–331.Google Scholar
  4. Henri, C. J., Collins, D. L., and Peters, T. M., 1991, Multi-modality image integration for stereotactic surgical planning, Med Phys. 18: 167–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kato, A., Yoshimine, T., Hayakawa, T., et al., 1991, A frameless, armless navigational system for computer-assisted neurosurgery, J Neurosurg. 74: 845–849.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kelly, P., and Kall, B., eds, 1992, “Computers in Stereotactic Neurosurgery,” Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  7. Pellizari, C., Chen, G. T. Y., Speibring, D. R., et al., 1989, Accurate three-dimensional registration of CT, MR and PET images of the brain, J Comp Assist Tomogr. 13: 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Peters, T. M., Clark, J. A., Pike, G. B., et al., 1989, Stereotactic neurosurgery planning on a PC based workstation, J Digital Imag. 2: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Reinhardt, H. F., and Zweifel, H. J., 1990, Interactive sonar-operated device for stereotactic and open surgery, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery 54-55: 393–397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Roberts, D. W., Pavlidis, J. D., Friets, E. M., et al., 1992, Computer image display during frameless stereotactic surgery, in: “Computers in Stereotactic Neurosurgery,” P. Kelly and B. Kall, eds. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 313–319.Google Scholar
  11. Zinreich, J. et al., 1993, Frameless stereotactic integration of CT imaging data. Accuracy and initial application, Radiology 188: 735–742.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. M. Peters
    • 1
  • A. C. Evans
    • 1
  • A. Olivier
    • 1
  1. 1.Montreal Neurological InstituteMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations