Abstract
Waste and waste management problems are as old as the human race. For purposes of this discussion, wastes can be grouped and identified according to three chemical categories: organic, inorganic, and radioactive. Throughout history, humans have disposed of organic wastes by piling them on the earth or by burial. Until this century, most of the organic waste that was disposed to the environment was manageable by natural biodegradation processes. Even though kinetically slow, these natural processes seemed to satisfactorily manage organic wastes until the middle of the twentieth century. During the post-World War II years, the combined effects of increasing population and accelerating industrial production created organic wastes in quantities that began to overwhelm the natural biodegradation processes. New chemical technologies began to produce very stable chemical products specifically designed to be used once and then discarded as waste. Many of those stable materials, such as plastics and transformer oils, are very resistant to biodegradation.
The authors wish to express appreciation for the time and effort contributed by many reviewers across the DOE complex. Their comments and constructive criticism have improved the quality of the resulting paper. The views and interpretations presented here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory or Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
“Progress in Nuclear Energy. Series III: Process Chemistry, Volume 2, ” F. R. Bruce, J. M. Fletcher, and H. H. Hyman, eds., Pergamon Press (1958).
H. O. Weeren, “Slucing Operations at Gunite Waste Storage Tanks,” ORNL/ NFW-84/42 (1984).
T. Tamura and H. O. Weeren, “Disposal of Waste by Hydraulic Fracturing,” presented at the 2nd Hazardous Material Conf., Philadelphia, June 6-8, 1984, published in Proc. 2nd Hazardous Materials Conf., pp. 483–497 (1984).
T. E. Myrick et al., “The Emergency Avoidance Solidification Campaign of Liquid Low-Level Waste at Oak Ridge National Laboratory,” ORNL/TM-11536 (March 1991).
Private discussion with A. Olsen: The Idaho site has recently restarted the calcination system to treat the remaining acid waste (May 1993).
(a) “Defense Waste Management Plan,” DOE/DP-0015, U. S. Dept. of Energy Headquarters (1983); (b) M. D. Boersma, “Process Technology for the Vitrification of Defense High-Level Waste at the Savannah River Plant,” ANS, Fuel Reprocessing and Waste Management Proceedings, 1, pp. 131-147 (1984).
Approximately 500 Ci/liter is based on a spent fuel that has cooled for 1 year with a total activity of 1.72x106 curies per ton of initial uranium and a process feed concentration of 250 g/liter.
“High-Level Waste System Plans,” Rev. O, WER-DPM-92-0153 (December 1992).
D. W. Turner, J. B. Berry, and J. W. Moore, “An Overview of the ORNL Waste Handling and Packaging Plant,” Waste Management ′90, published in the proceedings (February 1990).
K. S. Murthy, L. A. Stout, B. A. Napier, A. E. Reisenauer, D. K. Landstrom, “Assessment of Single-Shell Tank Residual Liquid Issues at Hanford Site, Washington,” PNL-4688, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington (1983).
DOE/EIS-0113, “Final Environmental Impact Statement: Disposal of Hanford Defense High-Level, Transuranic, and Tank Wastes, Hanford Site, Richland, Washington,” U. S. Department of Energy—Headquarters, Washington, DC (1987).
Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (May 1989).
J. T. Bell Participation: (a) Independent Engineering Review of Hanford Tank Waste Management Program, November 18-22, 1991; (b) Hanford Tank Waste Remediation Technology Workshop, February 11-12, 1992; (c) TWRS Technology Working Groups National Workshop, June 29-June 1, 1992.
Private communication with Frank Graham, Actinide Separations Workshop (May 1993).
General Accounting Office, “Nuclear Waste, Hanford Tank Waste Program Needs Cost, Schedule, and Management Changes,” GAO/RCED-93-99 (1993).
S. A. Barker, C. K. Thornhill, and L. K. Hilton, “Pretreatment Technology Plan,”WHC-EP-0629, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.
J. L. Straaslund et al., “Clean Option: An Alternative Strategy for Hanford Tank Waste Remediation,” PNL-8388, Vol. 1,UC T21 (1992).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bell, J.T., Bell, L.H. (1995). Separations Technology: The Key to Radioactive Waste Minimization. In: Schulz, W.W., Horwitz, E.P. (eds) Chemical Pretreatment of Nuclear Waste for Disposal. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2526-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2526-4_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6076-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2526-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive