Lepton Pairs from Thermal Mesons

  • Charles Gale
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSB, volume 335)

Abstract

For a while now, electromagnetic signals have been known as ideal probes of strongly interacting matter at high temperatures and densities1. This owes to the fact that once they are produced, they will travel relatively unscathed from their point of origin to the detector. Since production rates are rapidly increasing functions of temperature and density, these electromagnetic signals provide valuable information on the hot and dense phases of the reaction. It is hoped that, because of these facts, those signals should constitute precious aids in the process of analyzing the behaviour of hot quark-gluon matter2. As with any possible experimental signature of the QGP, a great deal of care must go into the calculation of a corresponding “purely hadronic” signal, that is a contribution to the same experimental observables from sources other than the deconfined, chiral-symmetric phase. As far as the quark-gluon plasma is concerned, one may refer to these sources as the “background”.

Keywords

Expense Emissivity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    E. Feinberg, Nuovo Cimento A 34, 39 (1976)Google Scholar
  2. E. Shuryak, Phys. Lett. 79B, 135 (1978)ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. E. Shuryak, Phys. Rep. 67, 71 (1980)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. G. Domokos and J. I. Goldman, Phys. Rev. D 23, 203 (1981)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. G. Domokos, Phys. Rev. D 28, 123 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. K. Kajantie and H. I. Miettenen, Z. Phys. C 9, 341 (1981); 14 357, (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. L. McLerran and T. Toimela, Phys. Rev. D 31, 545 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 2.
    For a recent review, see P.V. Ruuskanen in Particle Production in Highly Excited Matter, H.H. Gutbrod ed., Plenum, New York (1993), and references therein.Google Scholar
  9. 3.
    J. Kapusta, P. Lichard and D. Seibert, Phys. Rev. D 44, 2774 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 4.
    C. Gale and J.I. Kapusta, Nucl. Phys. B357, 65 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 5.
    J. Sakurai, Current and Mesons (University of Chicago Press, 1969)Google Scholar
  12. 5.
    N. Kroll, T. D. Lee and W. Zumino, Phys. Rev. 157, 1376 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 6.
    U.-G. Meiβner, Phys. Rep. 161, 213 (1988), and references therein.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 7.
    Review of Particle Properties, Phys. Rev. D 45, (1992).Google Scholar
  15. 8.
    P. Lichard, University of Minnesota preprint TPI-MINN-92/51-T, October 1992 (unpublished).Google Scholar
  16. 9.
    Charles Gale and Peter Lichard, Phys. Rev. D, in press.Google Scholar
  17. 10.
    P. Lichard and L. Van Hove, Phys. Lett. 245B, 605 (1990).ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 11.
    P. Lichard and J.A. Thompson, Phys. Rev. D 44, 668 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 12.
    D. Bisello et al., Phys. Lett. 220B, 321 (1989), and references therein.ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 13.
    N. Albrecht et al., Phys. Lett. 185B, 223 (1987), and references therein.ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 14.
    M.E. Biagini, S. Dubnička, E. Etim and P. Kolář, Nuovo Cimento A 104, 363 (1991). The paper does not contain all the necessary parameters to reconstruct the form factors. We are indebted to Dr. Dubnička for providing us with a more detailed information in the form of ready-to-use computer codes.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 15.
    V.M. Budnev and V. A. Karnakov, Pisma Zh. Eks. Teor. Fiz. 29, 439 (1979).Google Scholar
  23. 16.
    K. Kajantie, J. Kapusta, L. McLerran and A. Mekjian, Phys. Rev. D 34, 2476 (1986).Google Scholar
  24. 17.
    K.K. Gudima, A.I. Titov and V.D. Toneev, Phys. Lett. 287B, 302 (1992)ADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 17.
    P. Koch, Z. Phys. C 57, 283 (1993).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 18.
    A. Shor, Phys. Lett. 233B, 231 (1989).ADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 19.
    J. Cleymans, K. Redlich, and H. Satz, Z. Phys. C 52, 517 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 19.
    K. Haglin, C. Gale, and V. Emel’yanov, Phys. Rev. D 46, 4082 (1992); 47, 973 (1993).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 20.
    L. Landau and I. Pomeranchuk, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 92, 535 (1953); 92, 735 (1953).MATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 21.
    J. Cleymans, V.V. Goloviznin, and K. Redlich, Phys. Rev. D 47, 989 (1993).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 22.
    L. Xiong, E.V. Shuryak and G.E. Brown, Phys. Rev. D 46, 3798 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 23.
    Chungsik Song, Phys. Rev. C 47, 2861 (1993).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 24.
    Chungsik Song, Che Ming Ko, and Charles Gale, TAMU/McGill preprint, November 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles Gale
    • 1
  1. 1.Physics DepartmentMcGill UniversityMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations