Advertisement

Meta-Analysis of Animal Experiments: Elucidating Relationships Between Dietary Fat and Mammary Tumor Development in Rodents

  • Laurence S. Freedman
  • Carolyn K. Clifford
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 364)

Abstract

Meta-analysis is a statistical method of quantitatively combining results from different studies pertaining to a specific research question.1 The method has also been called ‘Overview,’ ‘quantitative review,’ and ‘pooling.’ There is now a large and rapidly growing literature on its use in medical research. It has been particularly successfully used in summarizing the results of groups of randomized clinical trials that have been designed to address the same or almost the same therapeutic question. Two pioneering examples are the meta-analyses of trials assessing the effect of beta-blockers on mortality following myocardi-al infarction,2 and of tamoxifen on breast cancer recurrence and survival rates following surgery for early stage breast cancer.3 Use of meta-analysis in epidemiology is also increasing; an interesting example is the meta-analysis of case-control studies of dietary factors and breast cancer reported by Howe et al. 4 which showed a significant relationship between dietary fat intake and postmenopausal breast cancer.

Keywords

Linoleic Acid Mammary Tumor Essential Fatty Acid Tumor Incidence Linoleic Acid Content 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Light, R.J. and D.B. Pillemer, Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1984).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yusuf, S., R. Peto, J. Lewis, R. Collins, and T. Sleight, Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials, Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 27:335 (1985).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group, Effects of adjuvant tamoxifen and of cytotoxic therapy on mortality in early breast cancer. An overview of 61 randomized trials among 28,896 women, N. Engl. J. Med. 319:1681 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Howe, G.R., T. Hirohata, T.G. Hislop, J.M. Iscovich, J.-M. Yuan, K. Katsouyanni, F. Lubin, E. Marubini, B. Modan, T. Rohan, P. Toniolo, and Y. Shunzhang, Dietary factors and risk of breast cancer: combined analysis of 12 case-control studies, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 82:561 (1990).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Freedman, L.S., Meta-analysis of animal experiments on dietary fat intake and mammary tumors, Stat. Med. (in press).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Freedman, L.S., C.K. Clifford, and M. Messina, Analysis of dietary fat, calories, body weight and the development of mammary tumors in rats and mice: a review, Cancer Res. 50:5710 (1990).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tannenbaum, A., The genesis and growth of tumors. III. Effects of a high-fat diet, Cancer Res. 2:468 (1942).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tannenbaum, A., The dependence of tumor formation on the degree of caloric restriction, Cancer Res. 5:609(1945).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wynder, E.L., Identification of women at high risk from breast cancer, Cancer 24:1235 (1969).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carroll, K.K., Introduction to Session I, Part B, Section 2, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 45:216 (1987).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boutwell, R.K., An overview of the role of diet and nutrition in carcinogenesis, in: Nutrition, Growth and Cancer, G.P. Trufiates and K.N. Prasad, eds., Alan R. Liss, New York (1988).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Albanes, D., Total calories, body weight and tumor incidence in mice, Cancer Res. 47:1987 (1987).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kipnis, V., L.S. Freedman, C.C. Brown, A. Hartman, A. Schatzkin, and S. Wacholder, The interpretation of energy adjustment models for nutritional epidemiology, Am. J. Epidemiol. 137:1376(1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Carroll, K.K., Summation: which fat/how much fat—animals?, Prev. Med. 16:510(1987).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jurkowski, J.J. and W.T. Cave Jr., Dietary effects of menhaden oil on the growth and membrane lipid composition of rat mammary tumors, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 74:1145 (1985).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ip, C, Fat and essential fatty acid in mammary carcinogenesis, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 45:218 (1987).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Welsch, C.W., J.L. House, B.L. Herr, S.J. Eliasberg, and M.A. Welsch, Enhancement of mammary carcinogenesis by high levels of dietary fat: a phenomenon dependent on ad libitum feeding, J. Natl. Cancer. Inst. 82:1615 (1990).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Freedman, L.S. and C.K. Clifford, Enhancement of mammary carcinogenesis by high levels of dietary fat and its association with ad libitum feeding, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 83:299 (1991).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Simon, R., Evaluating the differential effect of diet on rat carcinogenesis, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 83:1261 (1991).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ip, C, C.M. Carter, and M.M. Ip, Requirement of essential fatty acid for mammary tumori-genesis in the rat, Cancer Res. 45:1997 (1985).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hopkins, G.J., T.G. Kennedy, and K.K. Carroll, Polyunsaturated fatty acids as promoters of mammary carcinogenesis in Sprague-Dawley rats by 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced breast cancer in rats, J. Nutr. 114:1213 (1984).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurence S. Freedman
    • 1
  • Carolyn K. Clifford
    • 1
  1. 1.Biometry and Diet and Cancer Branches, Division of Cancer Prevention and ControlNational Cancer InstituteBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations