Skip to main content

Statistical Models of Chromosome Evolution

  • Chapter
Computational Methods in Genome Research

Abstract

Populations of biological organisms change with time and we can study how their genetic material is reassorted at meiosis and transmitted from one generation to the next [1]. Over longer time spans we cannot usually observe the changes in the genetic material directly but we can study the genetic properties of extant populations which we assume to have diverged from each other [2]. DNA sequencing is a direct way of characterising the genetic constitution of an individual and DNA can be recovered from bones dated by stratification in archaeological sites. Studies of fossil DNA, for example from Miocene leaves, have been reported. For the majority of extant species we are unlikely to be able to study the DNA of their antecedents. The comparative method in biology has been pursued for several hundred years on morphological criteria and for several decades on molecular criteria. The ideas of Darwinian evolution came out of a consideration of a combination of animal and plant breeding, adaptation of organism to environment, and comparative studies both morphological and biogeographical. The aim of phylogenetic inference is narrower. It attempts to elucidate the order of descent of organisms from common ancestors, most commonly on a tree. A popular example is of the three primates man, chimp and gorilla. There are three possible ways these animals could be related on a tree: (man (chimp, gorilla)); ((man, chimp) gorilla) and ((man, gorilla) chimp). Different datasets and different methods of analysis indicate different answers to the problem (a present consensus of these suggests the relationship is the second listed). If phylogenetic analysis is to be more than idle speculation then a statistical foundation to the subject is needed with explicit assumptions and testable hypotheses. Most progress has been made in this with regard to DNA sequences but other sorts of information are amenable to similar treatment. In fact the work we are doing concerns chromosomes and the orders of genes along them, but it is helpful to review other work first.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cannings, C., & Thompson, E.A. 1981. Genealogical and genetic structure.Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thompson, E.A. 1975. Human evolutionary trees. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Felsenstein 1981. J. Mol. Evol. 17, 368.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Edwards A.W.F 1972. Likelyhood, Camebridge Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldman, N. 1991. Statistical Estimation of Evolutionary Trees. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bishop, M.J., Friday, A.E. & Thompson, E.A. 1987. In Bishop, M.J. & Rawlings, C.J. eds. Nucleic acid and protein sequence analysis. IRL Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thome, J.L., Kishino, H. & Felsenstein, J. 1991. J. Mol. Evol. 33, 114–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thorne, J.L., Kishino, H. & Felsenstein, J. 1992. J.Mol. Evol. 34, 3–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sankoff, D., Cedergren, R. & Abel, Y. 1990. Methods in Enzymology 183, 428–438.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Brian, S.J. ed. 1987. Genetics maps. CSH Laboratory: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  11. O’Brian, S.J., Seuanez, H.N. & Womack, J.E 1988. Ann. Rev. Genet. 22, 232–251.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Searle, A.G. et al. 1989. Ann. Hum. Genet. 53, 89–140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. White, M.J.D. 1973. Animal cytology and evolution. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carson & Kaneshiro 1976. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Systematics 7, 311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bickmore, W.A. & Sumner, A.T. 1989. TIG 5, 144–148.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yunis, J.J. & Prakash, O. 1982. Science 215, 1525–1529.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Suzuki, D.T., Griffiths, A.J.F. & Lewontin, R.C. 1981. An introduction to genetic analysis. W.H.Freeman: San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sankoff, D. & Kruskal, J.B. 1983. Time warps, string edits and macromolecules.Addison-Wesley: Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Edwards, J.H. 1991. Ann. Hum. Genet. 55, 17–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bishop, M.J., Edwards, J.H., Dicks, J.L. (1994). Statistical Models of Chromosome Evolution. In: Suhai, S. (eds) Computational Methods in Genome Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2451-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2451-9_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6042-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2451-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics