A Scanning Electron Micrographic Comparison of the Effects of Two Preservative-Free Artificial Tear Solutions on the Corneal Epithelium as Compared to a Phosphate Buffered Saline and a 0.02% Benzalkonium Chloride Control

  • Kendyl Schaefer
  • Michelle A. George
  • Mark B. Abelson
  • Christopher Garofalo
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 350)

Abstract

Common ophthalmic preservatives can be divided into five classes: quaternary ammonium compounds (benzalkonium chloride), mercurials (thimerisol), alcohols (chlorobutanol), esters of parahydroxybenzoic acid, and other compounds (polymyxin and chlorhexidine).1

Keywords

Permeability Peroxide EDTA Glycol Hexagonal 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Osol, ed. “Remington’s Pharmaccutical Sciences,” 14th ed. Mack Publishing Company, Easton, PA (1970).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R.R. Pfister and N. Burstein, The effects of ophthalmic drugs, vehicles, and preservatives on corneal epithelium: a scanning electron microscope study, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 15:246–259 (1976),Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A.M. Tonjum, Effects of benzalkonium chloride upon the corneal epithelium studied with scanning electron microscopy. Acta Ophthalmol. 53:358–366 (1975).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N.L. Burstein and S.D. Klyce, Electrophysiologic and morphologic effects of ophthalmic preparations on rabbit cornea epithelium. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 16:899–911 (1977).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    N.L. Burstein, Preservative cytotoxic threshold for benzalkonium chloride and chlorhexidine digluconate in cat and rabbit corneas, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis Sci. 19:308–313 (1980).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rucker, R. Kettrey, F. Bach, and L. Zeleznick, A safety test for contact lens wetting solutions, Ann. Ophthalmol. 4:1000–1006 (1972).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Gobbels and M. Spitznas, Influence of artificial tears on cornea epithelium in dry eye syndrome, Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 227:139–143 (1989).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H.B. Collin and B.E. Grabsch, The effect of ophthalmic preservatives on the healing rate of the rabbit corneal epithelium after keratectomy, Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 59:215–222 (1982).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N.L. Burstein, Preservative alteration of corneal permeability in humans and rabbits. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 25:1453–1457 (1984).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R.J. Olson and G.L. While, Preservatives in ophthalmic topical medications: a significant cause of disease, (letter) Cornea 9:363–364 (1990).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    K.M. Schaefer, M.A. George, and G.J. Berdy, A scaning electron microscope comparison of the effects of 0.001% sodium silver chloride complex vs 0.001% benzalkonium chloride on the rabbit corneal epithelium, (suppl) Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 33:998 (1992).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kendyl Schaefer
    • 1
  • Michelle A. George
    • 1
  • Mark B. Abelson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christopher Garofalo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ImmunologySchepens Eye Research InstituteBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of OphthalmologyHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations