Skip to main content

Abstract

The “cheap talk games” studied in this chapter are games in which players with private information exchange payoff-irrelevant messages. (Crawford and Sobel (1982)) and (Green and Stokey (1980)) introduced the simplest cheap talk games, those in which a “sender” with private information sends a message to a “receiver,” who then takes an action. Equilibrium refinement criteria for sender-receiver games have been studied extensively,1 and variations of sender-receiver games have been used to model a variety of phenomena.2 Little work, however, has been done on more general cheap talk games. A few studies have considered multiple informed parties, but with only one round of pre-play communication.3 Even fewer studies have considered games with multiple rounds of communication, and then with only one informed party.4

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Austen-Smith, D. 1990. “Information Transmission in Debate.” American Journal of Political Science 34, 124–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume, A. 1992a. “Equilibrium Refinements in Sender-Receiver Games.” Mimeo, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume, A. 1992b. “Equilibrium Refinement in Perturbed Games and in Sender-Receiver Games.” Mimeo, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume, A., and Sobel, J. 1991. “Communication-proof Equilibria in Cheap-talk Games.” Mimeo, University of California at San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, V., and Sobel, J. 1982. “Strategic Information Transmission.” Econometrica 50, 1431–1452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J. 1985. “Credible Neologisms in Games of Communication.” Mimeo, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J. 1993. “Meaning and Credibility in Cheap-talk Games.” Games and Economic Behavior 5, 514–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J., and Gibbons, R. 1989. “Cheap Talk Can Matter in Bargaining.” Journal of Economic Theory 48, 221–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forges, F. 1990. “Equilibria with Communication in a Job Market Example.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 105, 375–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D., and Tirole, J. 1991. Game Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D., and Wilson, R. 1982. “Sequential Equilibria.” Econometrica 50, 863–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, J., and Stokey, N. 1980. “Two-person Games of Information Transmission.” Mimeo, Harvard and Northwestern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, S. 1989. “Veto Threats: Rhetoric in a Bargaining Game.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 347–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, S., Okuno-Fujiwara, M., and Postlewaite, A. 1991. “Refining Cheap-talk Equilibria.” Journal of Economic Theory 55, 247–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, S., and Postlewaite, A. 1989. “Pre-play Communication in a Two-person Sealed-bid Double Auction.” Journal of Economic Theory 48, 238–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. 1982. “Optimal Coordination Mechanisms in Principal-Agent Problems.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 10, 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. 1989. “Credible Negotiation Statements and Coherent Plans.” Journal of Economic Theory 48, 264–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palfrey, F. R., and Srivastava, S. 1991. “Efficient Trading Mechanisms with Pre-play Communication.” Journal of Economic Theory 55, 17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, M. 1990. “Communication between Rational Agents.” Journal of Economic Theory 51, 144–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidmann, D. 1990. “Effective Cheap Talk with Conflicting Interests.” Journal of Economic Theory 50, 445–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, Jeremy C. 1990. “Cheap Talk and the Fed: A Theory of Imprecise Policy Announcements.” American Economic Review 79, 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Matthews, S.A., Postlewaite, A. (1995). On Modeling Cheap Talk in Bayesian Games. In: Ledyard, J.O. (eds) The Economics of Informational Decentralization: Complexity, Efficiency, and Stability. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2261-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2261-4_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5953-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2261-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics