Abstract
There are many competing models of trade with imperfect competition. These models often give quite different policy implications as a result of different assumptions and specifications. Notable trade models with imperfect competition include Brander and Spencer (1984, 1985), Cheng (1988), Dixit (1984, 1988), Eaton and Grossman (1986), Krishna (1989), Krishna and Itoh (1988), Krugman (1984), Spencer and Jones (1992), and Venables (1985), among others.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brander, J. A. and B. J. Spencer (1984), Tariff protection and imperfect competition, in Henryk Kierzkowski (ed.), Monopolistic Competition and International Trade. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 194–206.
Brander, J. A. and B. J. Spencer (1985), Export subsidies and international market share rivalry, Journal of International Economics 18, 83–100.
Cheng, L. K. (1988), Assisting domestic industries under international oligopoly: the relevance of competition to optimal policies, American Economic Review 78, 746–758.
Dixit, A. (1984), International trade policies for oligopolistic industries, Economic Journal 94, 1–16.
Dixit, A. (1988), Anti-dumping and countervailing duties under oligopoly, European Economic Review 32, 55–68.
Eaton, J. and G. M. Grossman (1986), Optimal trade and industrial policy under oligopoly, Quarterly Journal of Economics 51, 383–406.
Krishna, K. (1989), Trade restrictions as facilitating practices, Journal of International Economics 26, 251–270.
Krishna, K. and M. Itoh (1988), Content protection and oligopolistic interactions, Review of Economic Studies 55, 107–125.
Krugman, P. (1984), Import protection as export promotion: international competition in the presence of oligopoly and economies of scale, in Henryk Kierzkowski (ed.), Monopolistic Competition and International Trade. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 180–193.
McKenzie, L. W. (1960), Matrices with dominant diagonals and economic theory, in K. J. Arrow, S. Karlin, and P. Suppes (eds.), Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 47–62.
Nikaido, H. (1968), Convex Structure and Economic Theory. New York: Academic Press.
Spencer, B. J. and R. W. Jones (1992), Trade and protection in vertically related market, Journal of International Economics 32, 31–55.
Uekawa, Y. (1993), Tariff protection with imperfect competition and existence of the general equilibrium solution with intra-industry trade, in M. Boldrin, R. Becker, R. Jones, and W. Thomson (eds.), General Equilibrium, Growth and Trade. New York: Academic Press, 541–554.
Venables, A. J. (1985), Trade and trade policy with imperfect competition: the case of identical products and free entry, Journal of International Economics 19, 1–19.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uekawa, Y. (1995). Imperfect Competition, Intra-Industry Trade, and Trade Policy. In: Chang, W.W., Katayama, S. (eds) Imperfect competition in international trade. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2249-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2249-2_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5947-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2249-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive