Effects of Asymmetric Neuronal Connectivity and Dopamine on Striatal Function: Simulation and Analysis of a Model for Huntington’s Disease

  • Rolf Kötter
  • Murray E. Alexander
  • Jeffery R. Wickens
Conference paper

Summary

The character of burst firing in a simulated network of striatal medium-sized spiny neurons is critically influenced by the symmetry of radial inhibitory interactions and by the size of an after-hyperpolarisation accumulating in a dopamine-dependent manner with prolonged spiking activity. Asymmetric connectivity transforms the normal pattern of stationary burst activity and depending on its type gives rise to a picture of traveling waves and of irregular sequences of activity, respectively. Decreasing the dopamine-dependent after-hyperpolarisation leads to prolonged burst duration, which functionally enhances the network effects of asymmetric connectivity. The implications of this model for explaining the symptom of chorea in Hunting-ton’s disease are discussed.

Keywords

Dopamine Autocorrelation Dura Dopa 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Coyle J.T., and Schwarcz R. (1976) Lesion of striatal neurons with kainic acid provides a model for Huntington’s chorea. Nature, 263:244–246ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ferrante R.J., Kowall N.W., and Richardson E.P. (1991) Proliferative and degenerative changes in striatal spiny neurons in Huntington’s disease: A combined study using the section-Golgi method and calbindin D28k immunocytochemistry. J. Neurosci., 11:3877–3887Google Scholar
  3. Graveland G.A., Williams R.S., and DiFiglia M. (1985) Evidence for degenerative and regenerative changes in neostriatal spiny neurons in Huntington’s disease. Science, 227:770–773ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Harper P.S. (1991) Huntington’s disease. Saunders, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Kanazawa I., Kimura M., Murata M., et al. (1990) Choreic movements in the macaque monkey induced by kainic acid lesions of the neostriaturim combined with L-DOPA. Brain, 113:509–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Klawans H.L.,Goetz C.G., Paulson G.W., et al. (1980) Levodopa and presymptomatic detection of Huntington’s disease - eight-year follow-up. New Engl. J. Med., 302:1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Myers R.H., Vonsattel J.P., Stevens T.J., et al. (1988) Clinical and neuropathological assessment of severity in Huntington’s disease. Neurology, 38:341–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rutherford A., Garcia-Munoz M., and Arbuthnott G.W. (1988) Anafterhyperpolarization recorded in striatal cells ‘in vitro’. Effect of dopamine administration. Exp. Brain Res., 71: 399–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Vonsattel J.P., Myers R.H.,Stevens T.J. et al. (1985) Neuropathological classification of Huntington’s disease. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol., 44:559–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wickens J.R.,Alexander M.E., and Miller R. (1991) Two dynamic modes of striatal function under dopaminergic-cholinergic control: Simulation and analysis of a model. Synapse, 8:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wilson M.A. and Bower J.M. (1989) The simulation of large-scale neural networks. In: Koch C. and Segev I. (eds.) Methods in Neural Modeling: From Synapses to Networks. MIT Press, Cambridge, 291–334Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rolf Kötter
    • 1
  • Murray E. Alexander
    • 2
  • Jeffery R. Wickens
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Anatomy & Structural BiologyUniversity of Otago, Medical SchoolDunedinNew Zealand
  2. 2.Dept.of Computer ScienceUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations