Skip to main content

Abstract

Much of the debate in the literature on business strategy revolves around the appropriate unit of analysis. For Michael Porter (1980) and others who take a “market power” position, the issue is how markets are structured and how a particular focal firm can take advantage of that structure. A second position, called the “resource-based view” (Wernerfelt 1984) begins with the firm, asks what its resources are, and then considers what product markets the firm could serve so as to most efficiently utilize the array of resources at its disposal. Both of these positions take for granted the ability of managers to control what firms are doing and how. This involves both the degree to which managers (presumptively top managers) control the organizations they are supposed to manage and the speed with which adjustment can be made. Finally, both take a single firm as the strategic referent, treating strategic analysis as something done uniquely by that firm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, P., and Tushman, M.L. 1990. “Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: a cyclical model of technological change.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 605–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention, In R.R. Nelson (ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity (pp. 609–625). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, J.S. 1959. Industrial organization. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S.R., Freeman, J., and Hybels, R.C. 1992. Strategic alliances in commercial biotechnology. In Nithin Nohria and Robert Eccles (eds.), Organizations and network analysis. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. 1991. “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.” Journal of Management 17: 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, E., and MacDonald, S. 1978. Revolution in miniature: the history and impact of semiconductor electronics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittain, J., and Freeman, J.H. 1980. “Organizational proliferation and density-dependent selection.” In John Kimberly and Robert Miles (eds.), Organizational life cycles (pp. 291–338). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R.A. 1983. “A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm.” Administrative Science Quarterly 28: 223–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S. 1982. Toward a structural theory of action. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S. 1992. Structural holes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G.R. 1984. The specialist strategy. In Glenn Carroll and David Vogel (eds.), Strategy and organization (pp. 117–128). Boston: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G.R. 1985. “Concentration and specialization: dynamics of niche width in populations of organizations.” American Journal of Sociology 90: 1262–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M., and Schoonhoven, C.B. 1990. “Organizational growth: linking founding team, strategy, and environment and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures, 1978-1988.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 504–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Electronics Buyers Guide. Supplement to Electronics, various years. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J., and Boeker, W. 1984. “The ecological analysis of business strategy.” California Management Review 26: 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J.H., Carroll, G.R., and Hannan, M.T. 1983. “The liability of newness: age dependence in organizational death rates.” American Sociological Review 48: 692–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J.H., and Hannan, M.T. 1983. “Niche width and the dynamics of organizational populations.” American Journal of Sociology 88: 1116–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T., and Carroll, G.R. 1992. The dynamics of organizational populations. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M., and Freeman, J. 1987. “The ecology of organizational founding: American labor unions, 1836–1985.” American Journal of Sociology 92: 910–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T., and Freeman, J. 1988. “The ecology of organizational morality: American labor unions, 1836–1985.” American Journal of Sociology 94: 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T. and Freeman, J. 1989. Organizational ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T. and Freeman, J. 1984. “Structural inertia and organizational change.” American Sociological Review 49: 149–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, H.A. 1993. “Follow the leader: mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets.” Administrative Science Quarterly 38: 393–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, A.H. 1950. Human ecology. New York: Ronald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, B. 1982. Organizational systematics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, C., and Wernerfelt, B. “Diversification, Ricardian rents, and Tobin’s q.” RAND Journal of Economics 19: 623–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R.., and Winter, S.G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. 1981. Power in organizations. Marshfield, Mass.: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. 1980. Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. 1985. Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. 1991. “Towards a dynamic theory of strategy.” Strategic Management Journal 12: 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J.V., and Lumsden, C.J. 1990. “Theory and research in organizational ecology.” Annual Review of Sociology, 16:161–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. 1989. Innovation and the organization of industry. Unpublished paper. Berkeley: Center for Research in Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. 1994. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Unpublished paper. Berkeley: Center for Research in Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turna, N.B., and Hannan, M.T. 1984. Social dynamics: Models and methods. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M.L., and Anderson, P. 1986. “Technological discontinuities and organizational environments.” Administrative Science Quarterly 31: 439–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. 1984. “A resource-based view of the firm.” Strategic Management Journal 5: 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H.C. 1981. “Where do markets come from?” American Journal of Sociology 87: 517–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust policies. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R.W., Ashton, P.K., and Egan, T.P. 1980. Innovation, competition, and government policy in the semiconductor industry. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Freeman, J. (1995). Business Strategy from the Population Level. In: Montgomery, C.A. (eds) Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm: Towards a Synthesis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2201-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2201-0_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5923-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2201-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics