Skip to main content

Abstract

This paper seeks to connect related strands of thought in evolutionary economics and the resource-based view of the firm. Although conceived primarily as an approach to the descriptive analysis of the firm and industry, evolutionary economics offers a distinctive view of the firm that is adaptable for the purposes of normative analysis (Winter 1987). The resource-based view, as it has been developed in the strategy literature, seeks to derive normative guidance for business decision making from a deeper understanding of the sources of interfirm profitability differences (Wernerfelt 1984; Rumelt 1984). It interprets these as reflections of differences in streams of rents and quasi-rents accruing to firms, which in turn are attributed to differences in the control and management of strategic resources.

With the customary caveats, I would like to express my appreciation for the helpful comments on an earlier draft that I received from Connie Helfat, Dan Levinthal and—especially—Cynthia Montgomery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amit, R., and Schoemaker, P. 1993. “Strategic assets and organizational rent.” Strategic Management Journal 14 (January): 33–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. 1962. “Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention.” In R. Nelson, ed., The rate and direction of inventive activity. 609–625. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. 1986. “Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck and business strategy.” Management Science 32 (October): 1231–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. 1989. “Asset stocks and sustained competitive advantage: a comment.” Management Science 35 (December): 1511–1513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. 1991. “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.” Journal of Management 17 (October): 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, W., and Demski, J. 1979. “The nature of income measurement.” The Accounting Review 54: 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castanias, R., and Helfat, C. 1991. “Managerial resources and rents.” Journal of Management 17 (October): 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. 1990. Scale and scope: the dynamics of industrial competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. 1973. “Industry structure, market rivalry, and public policy.” Journal of Law and Economics 16 (April): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx, I., and Cool, K. 1989. “Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage.” Management Science 35 (December): 1504–1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N., Knudsen, C., and Montgomery, C. 1995. “An exploration of common ground: integrating evolutionary and strategic theories of the firm.” In C.A. Montgomery (ed.), Resources from an evolutionary perspective: towards a synthesis of evolutionary and resource-based approaches to strategy: 1–17. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. 1986. “Sustainable advantage.” Harvard Business Review (September-October): 53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, J. 1968. “Adjustment costs in the theory of investment of the firm.” Review of Economic Studies 35: 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. 1980. The panda’s thumb: more reflections in natural history. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, J. 1971. “The private and social value of information and the reward to inventive activity.” American Economic Review 61: 561–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, C., and Zander, U. 1992. “Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology.” Organization Science 3: 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T.C. 1957. Three essays on the state of economic science. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D. 1994. “Adaptation on rugged landscapes.” Unpublished manuscript. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, S, and Rumelt, R. 1982. “Uncertain instability: an analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition.” Bell Journal of Economics 13: 418–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. 1967. “Adjustment costs and the theory of supply.” Journal of Political Economy 75 (August, Part I): 321–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, C. 1992. “Resources: the essence of corporate advantage.” Teaching note. Boston: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. 1991. “Why do firms differ, and how does it matter?” Strategic Management Journal 12: 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., and Winter, S. 1982b. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf, M. 1993. “The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view.” Strategic Management Journal 14: 179–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. 1980. Competitive strategy. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, R., and DeFillippi, R. 1990. Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 15: 88–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, P. 1973. “The expansion of firms.” Journal of Political Economy 81: 936–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R. 1984. “Towards a strategic theory of the firm.” In R. Lamb, ed., Competitive strategic management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R. 1987. “Theory, strategy and entrepreneurship.” In D. Teece, ed., The competitive challenge: strategies for industrial innovation and renewal: 137–158. Cambridge: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R., Schendel, D., and Teece, D. 1991. “Strategic Management and Economics.” Strategic Management Journal 12: 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. 1934 (Orig. in German, 1911). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. 1950. Capitalism, socialism and democracy, 3rd ed. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. 1994. “Intra-firm transfer of best practices project: executive summary.” INSEAD and International Benchmarking Clearinghouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. Forthcoming. “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.” Strategic Management Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treadway, A. “Adjustment costs and variable inputs in the theory of the competitive firm.” Journal of Economic Theory 2: 329–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. 1984. “A resource-based view of the firm.” Strategic Management Journal 5: 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. 1989. “From critical resources to corporate strategy.” Journal of General Management 14 (Spring): 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S. 1982. “An essay on the theory of production.” In S. Hymans, ed, Economics and the world around it: 55–91. Ann Arbor. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S. 1987. “Knowledge and competence as strategic assets.” In D. Teece, ed., The competitive challenge: strategies for industrial innovation and renewal: 159–184. Cambridge: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zander, U. and Kogut, B. Forthcoming. “Knowledge and the speed of transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test.” Organization Science.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Winter, S.G. (1995). Four Rs of Profitability: Rents, Resources, Routines, and Replication. In: Montgomery, C.A. (eds) Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm: Towards a Synthesis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2201-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2201-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5923-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2201-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics