Advertisement

Competitive Advantage and Industry Capabilities

  • Nicolai J. Foss
  • Bo Eriksen
Chapter

Abstract

Recently, numerous strategy scholars have revitalized the concern with the resources and capabilities side of firms. This trend often referred to as the “resource-based perspective” (RBP), has led to a much improved understanding of firms’ diversification strategies (Montgomery and Wernerfelt 19881 Montgomery and Hariharan 1991) and of the underlying conditions for sustained competitive advantage (Barney 1991 Peteraf 1993). Furthermore, the perhaps more dynamic issue of resource- accumulation processes has been treated in some detail (Dierickx and Cool 1989). In terms of the SWOT framework—the overall idea that strategy is a matter of obtaining fit between the Strengths of the firm and the Opportunities of the environment, while simultaneously safeguarding the Weaknesses of the firm from the Threats of that environment—the RBP may be said to have investigated and added further analytical content to the “Strength-Weaknesses” part.

Keywords

Competitive Advantage Individual Firm Industrial District Coordination Game Sustained Competitive Advantage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alchian, A.A. 1950. “Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory.” In idem. 1977. Economic Forces at Work. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, R.C. 1983. “Collective invention.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 4: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barney, J.B. 1986. “Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck and business strategy.” Management Science 32: 1231–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barney, J.B. 1991. “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.” Journal of Management 17: 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, W.M., and Levinthal, D.A. 1989. “Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D.” Economic Journal 99: 569–596.Google Scholar
  6. David, P.A. 1987. “Some new standards for the economics of standardization in the information age.” In Dasgupta, P. and P. Stoneman (eds.) 1987. Economic Policy and Technological Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dosi, G. 1982. “Technological paradigms and technological trajectories.” Research Policy 11: 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Demsetz, H. 1982. “Barriers to entry.” American Economic Review 72: 47–57.Google Scholar
  9. Dierickx, I., and Cool, K. 1989. “Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage.” Management Science 35: 1504–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Farrell, J., and Saloner. G. 1985. “Standardization, compatibility, and innovation.” Rand Journal of Economics 16: 70–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geroski, P., and Vlassopoulos. 1991. “The rise and fall of a market leader: frozen foods in the UK.” Strategic Management Journal 12: 467–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghemawat, P. 1991. Commitment: the dynamics of strategy. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. Langlois, R.N. 1990. “External economies and economic progress: The case of the microcomputer industry.” Mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  14. Langlois, R.N. 1992. “Transaction cost economics in real time.” Industrial and Corporate Change 1: 99–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Loasby, B. 1993. “Understanding markets.” Mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Stirling.Google Scholar
  16. Mansfield, E. 1985. “How rapidly does new industrial technology leak out?” Journal of Industrial Economics 34: 217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. March, J. 1991. “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning.” Organization Science 2: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marshall, A. 1925. Principles of economics. 8th ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Montgomery, C. A., and Hariharan, S. 1991. “Diversified expansion by large established firms.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 15: 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Montgomery, C.A., and Wernerfelt, B. 1988. “Diversification, Ricardian rents, and Tobin’s q.” RAND Journal of Economics 19: 623–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nelson, R.R., and Winter, S.G 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  22. Porter, M.E. 1980. Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. Porter, M.E. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press. Pyke, F., and Sengenberger, W. (eds.). 1992. Industrial districts and local economic regeneration. Geneva: International Institute for Labor Studies.Google Scholar
  24. Richardson, G.B. 1960. Information and investment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Richardson, G.B. 1972. “The organisation of industry.” Economic Journal 82: 883–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Routledge, B., and von Amsberg, J. 1994. “Endogenous social capital.” Mimeo, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  27. Russo, M. 1985. “Technical change and the industrial district: the role of interfirm relations in the growth and transformation of ceramic tile production in Italy.” Research Policy 14: 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Saxonian, A. 1991. “The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley.” Research Policy 20: 423–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stigler, G. 1951. “The division of labor is limited by the extent of the market.” Journal of Political Economy 59: 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sugden, R. 1986. The economics of rights, cooperation, and welfare. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  31. Teece, D.J. 1992. “Foreign investment and technological development in silicon valley.” California Management Review 34 (2): 88–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. 1991. “Firm capabilities, resources, and the concept of strategy.” Mimeo, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  33. Wernerfelt, B. 1984. “A Resource-Based View of the Firm.” Strategic Management Journal 5: 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Winter, S.G. 1984. “Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 5: 287–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicolai J. Foss
    • 1
  • Bo Eriksen
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Industrial Economics and StrategyCopenhagen Business SchoolUSA
  2. 2.Department of ManagementOdense UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations