“Next generation” reactor concepts have been developed to provide some enhanced safety and economic features for new plants that may be ordered during the 1990s and subsequent years. However, before considering such designs, we should examine the need for additional generating capacity and the likely competitiveness of nuclear plants in meeting this need.
KeywordsGraphite Zirconium Convection Carbide Cadmium
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.U.S. Senate Committee on Environmental and Public Works Hearing (101–861), “Role of Nuclear Energy in Meeting Future Energy Demands,” U.S. Gov’t Printing Office, 1990Google Scholar
- “U.S. Electricity Needs and DOE’s Civilian Reactor Development Program,” U.S. General Accounting Office, 1990.Google Scholar
- 2.E. J. Bruschi and R. P. Vijuk, Nucl. Technol., 91, 95 (1990)Google Scholar
- B. A. Mclntyre and R. K. Beck, Nucl. Safety, 33, 36 (1992).Google Scholar
- 3.R. L. Huang et al., Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 63, 314 (1991).Google Scholar
- 5.F. A. Silady and A. C. Millunzi, Nucl. Safety, 31, 215 (1990).Google Scholar
- 8.D. R. Pedersen and B. R. Seidel, Nucl. Safety, 31, 443 (1990).Google Scholar
- 10.L. R. Codey, “Proc. Topical Meeting on the Next Generation of Nuclear Power Plants,” American Nuclear Society, 1991.Google Scholar
- 11.H. A. Upton et al., Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 68, 355 (1993).Google Scholar
- 12.T. Matsuoka et al., Nucl. Safety, 33, 197 (1992).Google Scholar
- 13.C. Starr, Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 67, 46 (1992).Google Scholar