Inspection and acceptance sampling



The purpose of acceptance sampling is to provide for the user some assurance that the risks associated with accepting a lot are within specified limits. To do so, it is necessary to specify these risks, state clearly how sample data will be collected and measured, and state for what purpose it will be used and how to reach some conclusion (such as reach a decision to accept or reject the lot, or conclude whether the sample evidence is inconclusive). In this chapter we shall consider these issues, and provide a broad managerial approach to inspection and acceptance sampling.


Sampling Plan Expect Profit Prob Ability Sequential Probability Ratio Test Inspection Plan 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AFNOR (1993) Statistique, Tome 2, Controles Statistiques de Fabrication et d’Acceptation, 6eme Edition, Paris.Google Scholar
  2. American National Standards Institution (1986) Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Attributes, Z1.4, American Society for Quality Control, Milwaukee, WI.Google Scholar
  3. Daudin J.J., C. Duby and P. Trécourt (1990) Plans de controle double optimaux, Rev. Statistique Appliquée, 4, 45–59.Google Scholar
  4. D Handbook, H 53, June (1965) Guide for Sampling Inspection, Information Officer, Department of Defense, Pentagon, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  5. Dodge H.F. and H.G. Romig (1944) Sampling Inspection Tables, New Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Kenett R. and A. Halevy (1984) Statistical aspects of quality conformance inspection in military standard documents, Proceedings of the Fifth Intl. Conference of the Isreli Society for Quality Assurance, Tel Aviv,1 23–35.Google Scholar
  7. MIL-STD 414 (1957) Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Variables and Percent Defectivs, US Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  8. MIL-STD 1235B (1981) Single and Multi Level Continuous Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection Attributes, US Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  9. MIL-STD-109B (1969) Quality Assurance: Terms and Definitions.Google Scholar
  10. MIL-STD-490 (1968) Specifications Practices, 1968.Google Scholar
  11. MIL-STD-105D (1963) Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Attributes, US. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  12. Moskowitz H. and K. Tang (1992) Bayesian variables acceptance sampling plans: Quadratic loss function and step loss function, Technometrics, 34, 340–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Vance L.C. (1980) A Bibliography of Statistical Quality Control Techniques, 1970–1980, J. Qual. Tech., 15, 2, 59–62.Google Scholar
  14. Wald A. (1947) Sequential Analysis, New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Wetherhill G.B. (1977) Sampling Inspection and Quality Control, Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Wetherhill G.B. and W.K. Chiu (1975) A review of acceptance sampling schemes with emphasis on economic aspect, Intern. Stat. Review, 30, pp. 896–925.Google Scholar
  17. Abramowitz M. and I.A. Stegun (1964) Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Dover Publications, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Allied Quality Publications, 1972 NATO Quality Control Requirements for Industry (Ministry of Defence, London).Google Scholar
  19. Barnard G.A. (1954) Sampling inspection and statistical decisions, J. of the Royal Stat. Soc. Series B., 16, 151–174.Google Scholar
  20. Bowker A.H. and G.J. Lieberman (1959) Engineering Statistics, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
  21. Burr, I.W. (1953) Engineering Statistics and Quality Control, McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Campbell, S.K. (1974) Flaws and Fallacies in Statistical Thinking, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
  23. Cowden, D.J. (1957) Statistical Methods in Quality Control, Prentice-Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Cross R. (1984) PPM-Parts per Million-AOQL Sampling Plans, Quality Progress, vol 17, 11, 28–34.Google Scholar
  25. Dodge H.F. (1943) A Sampling Inspection Plan for Continuous Production, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 14, 264–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dodge H.F. and M.N. Torrey (1951) Additional Continuous Sampling Plans, Industr. Qual. Control, 7, 5, 7–12.Google Scholar
  27. Duncan A.J. (1974) Quality Planning and Industrial Statistics, 4, Irwin, Homewood, IL.Google Scholar
  28. Fetter R.B. (1967), The Quality Control System, Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL., 25–34.Google Scholar
  29. Freund R.A. (1985) Definitions and Basic Quality Concepts, J. Qual. Techn., 17, 1, 50–56.Google Scholar
  30. Guthrie D. Jr. and M.V. Johns Jr. (1959) Bayes acceptance sampling procedure for large lots, Annals of Math. Stat., 30, 896–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hald A. (1981) Statistical Theory of Sampling Inspection by Attributes, New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  32. Juran J.M. (1944) Management of Inspection and Quality Control, New York, Harper Bros.Google Scholar
  33. Juran J.M. and F.M. Gryna (1980) Quality Planning Analysis,, 2, McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Juran J.M., F.M. Gryna, R.S. Bingham (1976) Quality Control Handbook, 3rd ed., McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  35. Montgomery D.C. (1985) Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, Wiley, N.Y.Google Scholar
  36. Sarhan A. E. and B.G. Greenberg (1962) Contributions to Order Statistics, New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
  37. Tapiero C.S. and H. Lee (1989) Quality control and product servicing, Euro J. of Operations Research, 39, 261–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Charles S. Tapiero 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ecole Supérieure des Sciences Economiques et CommercialesParisFrance

Personalised recommendations