Skip to main content

Decision analysis and Bayesian methods in clinical trials

  • Chapter
Recent Advances in Clinical Trial Design and Analysis

Part of the book series: Cancer Treatment and Research ((CTAR,volume 75))

Abstract

The standard statistical approach to designing and analyzing clinical trials is frequentist. A purpose of this chapter is to describe a Bayesian approach as an alternative, or perhaps as a supplement. The two approaches have focuses so different that they can be viewed as distinct disciplines. And yet both deal with empirical evidence and both use probability, so the distinction is poorly understood by nonstatisticians. The distinction is further blurred when frequentists and Bayesians act and think alike — which they are wont to do, despite ‘anti’ rhetoric coming from both sides. Both approaches have good characteristics. The most important advantage of the Bayesian approach is attitude, which is consistent with the scientific method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berry DA (1987). Interim analysis in clinical trials: the role of the likelihood principle. Am Stat 41:117–122.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berger JO, Berry DA (1988). The relevance of stopping rules in statistical inference, Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics IV, vol. 1. New York: Springer-Verlag, 29–72.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Spiegelhalter DJ, Freedman LS, Parmar MKB (in press). Bayesian approaches to randomized trials (with discussion). J R Stat Soc A 157.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berry DA (1993). A case for Bayesianism in clinical trials (with discussion). Stat Med 12:1377–1404.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berry DA, Stangl DK (1995). Bayesian Biostatistics. New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Souhami RL, Spiro SG, Cullen M (1991). Chemotherapy and radiation therapy as compared with radiation therapy in stage III non-small cell cancer. N Engl J Med 324:1136–1137.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Li CC (1994). Metaanalysis of survival data. Ph.D. dissertation, Duke University.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Qian J (1994). A Bayesian Weibull Survival Model. Ph.D. dissertation, Duke University.

    Google Scholar 

  9. George SL, Li CC, Berry DA, Green MR. Stopping a clinical trial early: frequentist and Bayesian approaches applied to a CALGB trial in non-small cell lung cancer. Stat Med 13:1313-1327.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Berry DA (1991). Experimental design for drug development: a Bayesian approach. J Biopharmaceut Stat 1:81–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Berry DA, Wolff MC, Sack D (1992). Public health decision making: a sequential vaccine trial (with discussion). In Bayesian Statistics, vol. 4, JM Bernardo, JO Berger, AP Dawid, AFM Smith (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 79–96.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Berry DA, Wolff MC, Sack D. Decision making during a phase III randomized controlled trial. Controlled Clin Trials 15:360-378.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Berry DA, Fristedt B (1985). Bandit Problems: Sequential Allocation of Experiments. London: Chapman-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Berry DA, Eick SG. Adaptive assignment versus balanced randomization in clinical trials: A decision analysis. Stat Med 14:231-246.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Carlin BP, Chaloner KM, Louis TA, Rhame FS (in press). Elicitation, monitoring, and analysis for an AIDS clinical trial (with discussion). In Case Studies in Bayesian Statistics, C Gatsonis, J Hodges, R Kass (eds.).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rosner GL, Berry DA (in press). A Bayesian group sequential design for a multiple arm randomized clinical trial. Stat Med 14.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eddy DM, Hasselblad V, Schachter R (1992). Meta-Analysis by the Confidence Profile Method: The Statistical Synthesis of Evidence. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Berry DA, Hardwick J (1993). Using historical controls in clinical trials: application to ECMO. In Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics, JO Berger, S Gupta (eds.) vol. 5. New York: Springer-Verlag, 141–156.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lin Z (1993). Statistical Methods for Combining Historical Controls with Clinical Trial Data. Ph.D. Dissertation, Duke University.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lindley DV, Smith AFM (1972). Bayes estimates for the linear model (with discussion), J R Stat Assoc B 34:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Berger JO (1986). Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis, 2nd edition. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  22. DuMouchel W (1989). Bayesian metaanalysis, In Statistical Methodology in the Pharmaceutical Sciences. DA Berry (ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker, 509–529.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berry, D.A. (1995). Decision analysis and Bayesian methods in clinical trials. In: Thall, P.F. (eds) Recent Advances in Clinical Trial Design and Analysis. Cancer Treatment and Research, vol 75. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2009-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2009-2_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5830-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2009-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics