Advertisement

Knowledge-Based NDE System

  • Lawrence M. Brown
  • Robert DeNale
Chapter

Abstract

Radiographic inspections are required for all pressure hull welds in submarines to ensure that the weld metal meets or exceeds the acceptance standards [1]. Radiography has remained the dominant weld inspection technique in the Navy because the technique is sensitive to the discontinuity types of interest and because the radiographic technique produces a permanent record of the weld inspection.

Keywords

Weld Metal Acceptance Criterion Ultrasonic Signature Electric Power Research Institute Ultrasonic Inspection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    “Fabrication, Welding, and Inspection of HY80/100 Submarine Applications,” MIL-STD-1688 (SH) (9 Feb 1981).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    DeNale, R. and C. Lebowitz, “A Comparison of Ultrasonics and Radiography for Weld Inspection,” in Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, edited by D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chementi, Plenum Press, New York, Vol. 8B, pp. 2003-2010 (1989).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    DeNale, R. and C. Lebowitz, “Detection and Disposition Reliability of Ultrasonics and Radiography for Weld Inspections,” in Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, edited by D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chementi, Plenum Press, New York, Vol. 9B, pp. 1371-1378 (1990).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lebowitz, C.A., “Evaluation of an Automated Ultrasonic Scanner,” Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, edited by D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chementi, Plenum Press, New York, Vol. 10B, pp. 2045-2052 (1991).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Microsoft Corporation, Microsoft® C/C++ Version 7.0, Environment and Tools, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA (1991).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    DeNale, R., and C. Lebowitz, “Weld Defect Sizing Using Time-of-Flight-Diffraction Ultrasonics,” 38th Defense Conference on Nondestructive Testing, Kelly AFB, TX (1989).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    “Ultrasonic Inspection Procedure & Acceptance Standards for Hull Structure Production & Repair Welds,” NAVSEA 0900-LP-006-3010 (Jan 1966).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rumelhart, D.E., J. McClelland, and the PDP Research Group, Parallel Distributed Processing, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1988).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    NeuralWare, Inc., Reference Guide For NeuralWorks and Professional II/Plus, NeuralWare, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA (1991).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Microsoft Corporation, Programmer’s Guide, Microsoft ® Visual Basic —, Version 2.0, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA (1992).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    “Requirements for Nondestructive Testing Methods,” MID-STD-271F (27 June 1986).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Willetts, A.J., F.V. Ammirato, and E.K. Kietzman, “Accuracy of Ultrasonic Flaw Sizing Techniques for Reactor Pressure Vessels,” Electric Power Research Institute Report EPRI NP-6273, Project 1570-2 (Mar 1989).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Forli, O., and B. Pettersen, “The Performance of Conventional Ultrasonic and Radiographic Weld Examinations,” British Journal of NDT, pp 364-366 (November 1985).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Freeman, J.A., and D. M. Skapura, Neural Networks: Algorithms, Applications, and Programming Techniques, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA (1992).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Borland International, Inc., BorlandC++ User’s Guide, Version 3.1, Borland International, Scotts Valley, CA (1992).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brown, L.M. and R. DeNale, “Real-Time Evaluation of Ultrasonic Weld Inspections,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on NDE in the Nuclear and Pressure Vessel Industries, ASM International, Metals Park, OH, pp. 333-337 (1992).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brown, L.M., J.S. Lin and R.W. Newman, “Signature Classification Development System,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, Vol. 3A, pp. 265-272 (1993).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brown, L.M. and R. DeNale, “Classification of Ultrasonic Defect Signatures Using an Artificial Neural Network” in Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, edited by D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chementi, Plenum Press, New York, Vol. 10A, pp. 705-712 (1991).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence M. Brown
    • 1
  • Robert DeNale
    • 1
  1. 1.Annapolis Detachment, Carderock DivisionNaval Surface Warfare CenterAnnapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations