Issues on Reproducibility/Reliability of Magnetic NDE Methods
One of the critical elements related to the practicality of any NDE technique is its reproducibility under nominally the same inspection conditions. The results of certain test methodologies, however, are not always repeatable and understanding the origin of the irreproducibility is often as critical as obtaining reproducible results. One example is the characterization of residual stress in structural ferromagnets using the magnetoacoustic (MAC) method . Although it has not been widely publicized, the test results of this method are known to be time-dependent. Two distinct types of time dependencies have been observed during testing. The first type has a clearly definable relaxation time, while no such trend has been observed for the second.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.D. Utrata and M. Namkung, Presented at Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE, Brunswick, Maine, (July 30–August 4, 1993).Google Scholar
- 2.M. Namkung and D. Utrata, in Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE Vol. 7B edited by D.O. Thompson and D.E. Chimenti, p. 1429 (Plenum Press, New York, 1987).Google Scholar
- 3.G.W. Ranthenau, in Magnetic Properties of Metals and Alloys, (American Society of Metals, Cleveland, Ohio, 1958).Google Scholar
- 4.M. Namkung, D. Utrata, W.T. Yost, P.W. Kushnick and J.L. Grainger, Proc. of IEEE Ultrasonic Symposium, Vol. 2, 1061 (1987).Google Scholar
- 5.S. Chikazumi, Physics of Magnetism, (John Wiley & Sons, 1964).Google Scholar
- 6.C.S. Barrett, Structure of Metals, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1952).Google Scholar
- 7.G.B. Olsen and M. Cohen, Dislocations in Solids, Vol. 7, edited by E R.N. Nabarro (North-Holland, New York, 1986).Google Scholar
- 8.H. Trauble, in Magnetism and Metallurgy, Vol. 2, edited by A.E. Berkowitz and E. Kneller (Academic Press, New York, 1969).Google Scholar